Here Mahidhara explains the meaning of words in 22 almost similar words are used in 23. So people can note them. Dayanand uses derivate meaning which is not valid.
Now continue
Ashvamedha is सर्ववाचात्मक as stated in Shukla yajurveda shatpath brahmana,All type of Speeches are made there. During Yajna the meaning of mantra is not Spoken.
Vedas and Shraut sutras mentions the Prayschits for all the 12 mantras which includes "Bad speech". Just tell me one simple thing If what they are saying is good! Then why does Prayschit for speaking bad words take place in verse no 32?? Utterly illogical
Vedas are the source of all wisdoms from adhyatma to kama shastra. We don't tell the meaning of verses while doing Yajnya.
In many cases women doesn't speak adhvaryus themselves speak on the behalf of women.
Whatever mahidhara has written in those 12 verses is true and verified by Veda brahmanas+ Shraut sutras. This Samvad is to make प्राण उत्क्रमण। Vedas describe Prayschit for that means there was something wrong being spoken.
These people without a Guru parampra come and speak anything against Vedic acharyas through Pdfs. Read this for clarity
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In Rgveda Shakala samhita the total number of letters is 4,32,000. Rishis have calculated every word of Veda so the knowledge can be passed without a single letter getting lost.
Similar is the case with the tradition of interpretation. You can notice it in DarshanaShastras too. In Vedanta the debate about what is the meaning of अथ in the sutra अथातो ब्रह्मजिज्ञासा has taken many books to explain.
Interpretation of vedas require much effort.
Durgacharya has written {meaning in image
"Women didn't used to cover their breasts before British Rule" All this is Victorian Morality
Traditions, customs and dresses may vary within communities and region. But you can't say that "women didn't used to cover the upper part of body". There are different types of clothes mentioned to serve the purpose.
All of us agree that Kalidasa is Pre Mughal, Pre-British and maybe pre to any type pf cultural invasion.
For a second imagine all these stories to be true(in the way he has represented).
anecdotes cannot be against Vedas. By saying that the "meaning of Vedas should be taken from Itihasa and Puranas" we mean that history and Puranas are only for Vedas. Not against it.
If the method is derived from the Anecdote going against Veda or Smriti. So Due to the stability of the fame of Ravana,till date who abducted someone's wife such method can be derived :-
"कीर्तिकामः परदारानपहरेत् (the person who desires fame has to abduct the wife)"
But it's not derived because it's against Veda and Smritis. Therefore, one should imagine that the anecdotes holds no authority to determine what is dharma and adharma by themselves...
😂 Real Ramayan, Lol who takes these people seriously
In the very first page see how ill logic "Rama was a human not an avatara" this is the propaganda they are promoting and Hindus will be fine with this.
Also in this "pure ramayana "Hanumanji used monoplane ✈️ to reach lanka