Very well. *breathes in* Age of consent thread, here we go.
It is completely normal, healthy, and indeed, Lindy for a man to be attracted to and romantically desire sexually mature, fertile young girls. There is nothing remotely psychologically unsound about this.
In fact, in Current Year it is even healthier than it was in the past, as a man who prefers purity is not going to find it in any 23 year old female now living.
There would be nothing inherently wrong with the natural attraction to teenage girls if we lived in a society where mentally desiring something was decoupled from the moral right to engage in that behavior.
Sexual liberalism introduced an entirely new standard of morality to our species, one only heretofore taken seriously in depraved Satanic cults: "Do as you please. Nothing is immoral as long as both parties will it."
If consent-based morality were immediately adopted as an absolute, no one would tolerate such an absurd abomination, the moment they thought of their own children, and the kinds of people who might be interested in manufacturing their consent.
Thus, to make consent-based morality seem reasonable, the "age of consent" had to be invented, a magical age at which the atomised, free individual suddenly gains the power to consent to whatever he wants, with absolutely no moral implications.
One day it is terrible for a girl to be prostituted. The day she reaches the magical "Age of Consent," however, suddenly her prostitution is perfectly okay; you are not allowed to feel any moral way about it, and in fact, it is immoral to stop her if that's what she wants.
The age of consent is a thing because French philosophers failed to convince normal people that "I don't want my 14 year old daughter being used sexually by some random man" was an unreasonable objection to sexual liberalism. The number was raised until they could convince them.
But the "Age of Consent," this magical island where morality is still for a time allowed to apply to human behavior, was always a bigoted reactionary fiction, an unprincipled exception destined to be whittled down to nothing like all others through successive normalizations.
Yesterday, a girl's *own parents* would make sure that as soon as she reached a certain age, she was given birth control to ensure her Human Right™ to not get pregnant from having sex, that she might be free and wild and beyond good and evil, no longer the slave of natural law.
Today, even younger children are offered even wilder liberations from their own biology in the name of the Satanic morality of consent. Nothing could be more evil, and I do not feel any shame for opposing this way of thinking about morality.
Much simpler: All sex outside of marriage is wrong. A girl can potentially get married once she is sexually mature to a good, worthy, vetted man. The age of the girl and her husband could vary depending on circumstance.
You would not need to obsess over and frantically negotiate an "age of consent" if we lived in a society where moral laws other than "do what thou wilt" still applied to adults. This temporary and illusory exemption for children was designed to make you tolerate it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with society inhabitant

society inhabitant Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nixonist

30 May
They must have grown up before social media and 'dating' apps. Women are monsters now.
The utter predictability of online social interactions with females is eerie. You could talk to a different girl every week for YEARS, and every conversation would go exactly the same, down to the minutest detail: ghosted within two days.
There is not a single girl on the whole planet who just wants one person of the opposite sex to be best friends with and share their life with. It didn't used to be this way; as recently as the 2000s, it was common for women to romanticize monogamous partnership.
Read 6 tweets
15 May
You are free to go live in your mud hut, Okonkwo. Monogamists will do what they have always done: build civilization by giving men an incentive not to act like animals.
Pre-civilization: Apes killing and raping each other, ripping their faces and genitals off, blaspheming and hollering in mad rites of cannibalism, sexual mutilation, and child sacrifice
Civilization: Monogamy invented, men have an incentive to act like human beings, the world is temporarily a relatively nice and sane place to live
Read 4 tweets
14 May
If being united with and accepted by another being with a nature made to be perfectly complementary to your own is not inherently appealing, what is? Love, happiness, sanity, morality, Victorian fictions all!
It is worth noting that this rationalist nonsense appeared on my timeline because two women I follow liked it. I think women simply take what it represents for granted because they imagine the feeling of being inherently worth something is universal to all creatures.
The biologically constructed value that women enjoy, not the universal longing of a consciousness for its right to exist to be affirmed by others, is the true arbitrary product of evolution here. Sex might be mechanically arbitrary, but is a direct solution to the latter problem.
Read 9 tweets
2 May
Welcome to Incel History Month 2021! Each day during the month of May, we will be highlighting the life of a famous Incel, to celebrate and hopefully raise the visibility of one of history's most accomplished but hated and marginalized groups!
(Note: In accordance with new IP style guidelines, all instances of 'Incel' should to be capitalized. Words like 'sexhaver,' 'normie,' 'chad,' etc. should NEVER be capitalized, as this is disrespectful to the struggles of the Incel community.)
Incel of the day #1 - Joseph Merrick
Joseph Merrick, also known as the Elephant Man, was a Victorian truecel notable for his bad personality. It is said that women could detect his misogyny just by looking at him. He died a kissless virgin at the age of 27. ImageImageImage
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!