I've been learning about Sacagawea because my eldest is in elementary school -- what a grim story. Kidnapped from her tribe at 12 by another tribe, sold as a slave into a forced marriage at 13 alongside another wife, first kid by 16. Dead by 25. No known images of her.
Her "husband" was hired by Lewis & Clark for their expedition. She was some help as an interpreter and at points a guide, but her biggest value was her presence with his infant son, which told other tribes that L&C was not a raiding party.
As part of their travels they encountered her brother, who was chief of a tribe and she hadn't seen since before her first kidnapping. We aren't even sure what her original name was, and people called her different things. C nicknamed her "Janey."
After her death, her "husband" let Clark adopt the boy, for whom he had much affection, who went to school and was famous throughout his life. (Her daughter died young, but I'm not sure of the details).
The reason she is famous is because suffragettes made up stories about her to make her a woman hero. (Her life was heroic, but the stories they told were fiction). She's a big figure in young adult novels, but what they say is not true (e.g. that she lived).
There are competing literature on her, but in sum she was sold as a slave twice -- the second time perhaps as part of a wager -- apparently raped to have kids when she was a teen, and after her death her image was repurposed for political purposes.
This is probably not a story for a young kid in elementary school. But it is a good illustration of the bowdlerized history we tell ourselves.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Daniel Schuman

Daniel Schuman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @danielschuman

11 Jun
So in December 2020, Congress quietly passed a provision that **in theory** protects the Senate from what just happened to Adam Schiff & the House intel cmte staff. See page 1953. congress.gov/116/bills/hr13…
What does it do? It covers electronic communication services stored off-site from the Senate as if it were stored at the Senate. To obtain electronic records stored at the Senate, you have to show up with a warrant, which provides notice.
Under this provision, records held **remotely** by a third party are treated as if they are held at the Senate itself.

It also has an anti-gag provision, so the court cannot tell the 3rd party provider to not tell the Senate.
Read 16 tweets
11 Jun
Ooooo. This is going to be a thing.
Oooo. "The zeal in the Trump administration’s efforts to hunt leakers led to the extraordinary step of subpoenaing communications metadata from members of Congress — a nearly unheard-of move outside of corruption investigations. "
%@%(*&* "The Justice Department secured a gag order on Apple that expired this year, according to a person familiar with the inquiry, so lawmakers did not know they were being investigated until Apple informed them last month."
Read 8 tweets
10 Jun
I'm watching the US FOIA Advisory Committee meeting, which will consider recommendations on applying FOIA to certain legislative branch agencies. You can watch it here.

(If you want to make public comments, you can join via their webex)
I am fairly sure that @digiphile and @gingermccall are also following along.
The Leg subcommittee making its recommendations now re: (1) FOIA Fees; (2) FOIA Funding; (3) expanding FOIA's scope. (Most focus will be on #3 because there are recs).
Read 14 tweets
8 Jun
I'm reading the new @HSGAC + @SenateRules report on the Capitol Insurrection. You can find it here: rules.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Here is the statement summarizing the contents. It is notable that the Committees did not receive fully cooperation from the Executive branch.

"USCP's lead intelligence component ... was aware of the potential for violence in the days AND WEEKS ahead of January 6." (capitalization added) IICD failed to incorporate this info in its assessments....
Read 45 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!