FBI Director Wray is testifying before House Judiciary, and Nadler is making the focus January 6.

Nadler: "We need to understand what the Bureau knew in the runup to the attack; when it knew it; and what prevented it from disrupting the work of the terrorists who planned it."
Nadler urges a full review of "white supremacist membership" within the FBI.

"The FBI must do the hard work of keeping itself honest," Nader says. "Ample evidence shows that the crowd that stormed the Capitol was full of off-duty police and military personnel."
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN): "I'm talking about Mr. Big, Number One. Have you gone after the people who incited the riot?"

FBI Director Chris Wray: "I don't think it would be appropriate for me to be discussing whether or not we are or aren't investigating specific individuals."
Rep. Swalwell: "Was January 6 an insurrection?"

FBI's Wray: "I certainly understand why you would describe it that way. In my role as FBI Director, because that's a term that has legal meaning, I really have to be careful...We're treating it as an attack of domestic terrorism."
FBI Director Chris Wray hints at "serious charges" still to come in the January 6 investigation.

Wray: "This is a very ongoing investigation and there's a lot more to come. I would expect to see more charges —some of them maybe more serious charges."
FBI Director Chris Wray reiterates that Biden won the election fair and square.

"As former Attorney General Barr and former Acting Attorney General Rosen have both said, we looked but we didn't see fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the presidential election."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jan Wolfe

Jan Wolfe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JanNWolfe

8 Jun
DOJ's brief in the E. Jean Carroll case has divided legal experts. But many of them are coming to Garland's defense.

“DOJ is not trying to save Trump, but protect a strong presidency and executive branch," says Biden transition lawyer @AndyMcCanse.
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
It was one of two recent cases in which DOJ angered liberals by taking a stance shielding Trump/Barr.

But @BradMossEsq says he understands DOJ's thinking.

"What we are seeing here is the department making decisions in these cases the way it is supposed to be done,” Moss said.
“Everyone is upset about the facts of this case, which is understandable, but Garland has to think about the precedent he is setting for everyone,” says @RDEliason.

Garland wants to avoid a precedent that makes it easier for future officials to get sued, Eliason says.
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
NEW: DOJ is *not* reversing positions in @ejeancarroll's defamation case against Trump.

Like the Trump DOJ, the Biden DOJ says her lawsuit should be dismissed on the grounds that Trump acted within the scope of his presidential duties when he insulted her and called her a liar. ImageImage
DOJ wants to be substituted for Trump as the defendant, which would mean Carroll has no remedy because you can’t sue the government for defamation.
cnn.com/2021/06/07/pol…
Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
New: Derek Chauvin has asked a judge for a reduced sentence, saying prison will inflict "long-term damage" on his "life prospects."
mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/me…
Derek Chauvin says his sentence should be relatively light because he himself is "a product of a broken system."
One of Derek Chauvin's post-trial arguments is that juror Brandon Mitchell, pictured below, was biased.

Mitchell has called George Floyd a "legend" and a "martyr" during media appearances.

"Mitchell's language is simply not that of an impartial juror," Chauvin says.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jun
Do people like Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell even believe what they're saying? Is it a grift?

Interestingly, Dominion Voting now says it's possible Mike Lindell is a "cunning salesman" who doesn't actually buy his own claims but wants fame and money.
Mike Lindell isn't crazy, Dominion says.

On the contrary, he and his company "promoted the inherently improbable Big Lie that the election had been stolen from Trump because they thought their defamatory marketing campaign would dupe Trump supporters into buying MyPillows."
@rparloff wrote a good piece about whether there's an insanity defense to defamation.

Clearly, Dominion has a stronger case if it can convince a jury that Mike Lindell is actually a savvy grifter who doesn't believe his own nonsense.
news.yahoo.com/dominion-v-my-…
Read 4 tweets
25 May
Breaking: DOJ will appeal the recent court ruling that blasted ex-AG Bill Barr's handling of the Mueller report and ordered the release of an underlying memo to @CREWcrew.

Congressional Democrats had urged AG Garland *not* to do this.
This filing from DOJ sheds light of AG Garland's thinking. In short, DOJ is appealing because this case would create a precedent, and because it's not happy with Judge Berman Jackson's view of a FOIA exemption known as the "deliberative process privilege."
drive.google.com/file/d/11Uv0aM…
One way of thinking about AG Garland's move tonight: He's not protecting Bill Barr so much as protecting the federal government's ability to reject FOIA requests in the future by invoking the "deliberative process privilege."
Read 7 tweets
11 May
Christopher Miller, the Pentagon chief on January 6, will testify tomorrow that he personally believes Trump "encouraged" the deadly attack.
Christopher Miller, the Pentagon chief on January 6, is going to be grilled by Rep. Carolyn Maloney shortly, Judging by her opening remarks, she's skeptical of his claim that the Defense Dept did everything by the book.
Update: Miller didn't read out aloud his prepared remarks that criticized Trump. Quite unusual.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(