The conflation begins early: while all faculty applicants at UC submit DEI statements, the general use of DEI statements is much different than the way they've been used in the Advancing Faculty Diversity Initiative searches, which are specially-funded, targeted & small-scale.
Even within the targeted AFD searches, the rubric these authors provide was not mandated or universally employed. I was on an AFD search committee @UCDavisLaw that did NOT use the rubric these authors are quoting from. At @ucdavis, I think only 3 hires were made using this rubric
It's true that in the limited searches THAT WERE FOCUSED ON DEI WORK, UCB cut a lot of people who didn't write good DEI statements. Similarly, when my school is hiring in IP, we cut a lot of people who do torts; we don't hire immigration restrictionists to run our asylum clinic.
Here's where these factual mistakes matter. Academic freedom means that teaching & research can only be judged by disciplinary experts in one's field. If rubrics are being imposed from above (as these authors mistakenly say), that's an academic freedom problem. If not, it's not.
Quick side point: @ucfreespeechctr does much more than the authors note. For example, it has also now sponsored four classes of Fellows, with a $25k budget for each, funding a broad array of research--including mine on DEI statements. This is all readily available on the website.
I have a different take here. UC should demand that all disciplines attend to diversity, equity, and inclusion, but allow that this will operate differently in different disciplines. This is fully consistent with academic freedom's focus on disciplinary expertise.
Finally, it is notable that a long essay about purported threats to academic freedom at the University of California makes no mention of any of the structures in place to protect academic freedom throughout the system, or any of the work done there on these very issues.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lots of people are applying for jobs at a UC right about now--which is awesome, especially if its @UCDavisLaw --and a few have reached out to me for advice about the required diversity, equity, & inclusion (DEI) statements. Turns out it's a subject on which I have a LOT to say:
So here's some advice, in case it's useful. First, focus on what you've done or plan to do, not on abstract statements about how much you care about students of all backgrounds. This is a chance for reflection on what you've (hopefully) done to make your field more inclusive.
Don't just rely on the fact that you write/teach about some issue with social justice implications. Regardless of what you teach, have you worked to diversify your reading list? Have you made your own materials to lessen students' financial burdens?
Amazing here how the authors trot out all the usual misrepresentations about how UC actually uses DEI statements, then fail to note how UC already does EVERYTHING the authors suggest as better paths forward. chronicle.com/article/how-to…
As usual, the authors fail to note that the 5 (not 8) searches at Berkeley that attracted 893 applicants in 2018 were specifically searching for faculty who had made strong DEI contributions. That was the job description, not some add on. This is not our general hiring procedure.
The authors fail to realize that Berkeley experiment was addressing the very problems the authors say they care about: institutional and journal prestige bias! Berkeley was showing what would happen if you don't use CVs to do the initial cut in a hiring search.
Big academic freedom news: Zoom has officially announced that it is handing off content moderation to universities for (almost) everything hosted on university Zoom accounts that is "related to the institution's academics or operations."
This is an issue UC's system-wide faculty Committee on Academic Freedom has been working on since late last year. The faculty released a statement a few months ago calling on Zoom to make a change like this: senate.universityofcalifornia.edu/_files/reports…
Since then, I've been meeting with Zoom's lawyers, UC's lawyers, and law and tech people at several other schools to develop a policy that would get Zoom out of the business of deciding whether classes, talks, student events etc. comply with Zoom's standard terms of service.