From the title and shape, I am guessing that this is meant to be one of those graphics that stand alongside trails as people walk around. 🚶♀️🚶♂️
This means most people are there for the scenery and not the information, so it could be a TOUGH crowd to reach! 2/14
With a big, wide, poster like this, people are probably going to just glance at it first.
What attracts their attention first? Is it a good entry point? 3/14
When I first looked at this, my eyes 👓 instantly popped to "You are here."
It's red 🔴, standing alone surrounded by lots of white space, and set at a jaunty angle. ALL of those signal, "Hey, I'm important, look at me!" 👀 4/14
"You are here" is important to people, because people LOVE 😍 to see themselves reflected in the poster.
But where you are supposed to see your position is maybe not optimized for viewing from a distance. The map is low contrast with lots of fine details. 5/14
"Welcome" is usually the FIRST thing people expect to hear (or read).
I'm not sure that priority is established visually here. 6/14
If you want to read the poster, you will probably want to start in the upper left corner. ↖
This almost reads like a sidebar, an aside, not a start point. (If it is, maybe it could go on the right? ➡) 7/14
The left heading talks about bays and estuaries, but the left graphic heading only mentions the latter.
The left graphic seems to answer the question, "What are estuaries?", which isn't asked in the heading. 8/14
The left graphic has different typefaces and an overall style than the rest of the poster. 9/14
Alignment helps signal organization. While the main blocks are fairly well organized, there's a lot of "drift" in placement of items. 10/14
The logos are sensibly down in the "fine print zone" in the bottom. ⬇
I am wondering why there are two similar logos down there. 11/14
For a project like this, I could imagine websites visits through the QR code being a measure of success.
You have to entire people to scan a QR code: They need to know what the carrot is. 🥕
"Learn more" is maybe not the juiciest carrot. 12/14
I'm sure someone who knows copy editing better than me can say whether there should be another "S" here.
Is it "MassBays'" or "MassBays's"?
A quick web search shows conflicting opinions. 13/14
That said: The poster could go up as it is and nobody would be embarrassed 😳 by it.
Alright, another common misconception I encounter is the gene vs allele/variant mixup. Most often I see it phrased something like "She has the gene for breast cancer."
In this example, I think we all understand what the person means: she has a genetic variant that makes her more predisposed to breast cancer. For a lot of purposes, that's the only information we really need.
But in reality, we all have two copies or alleles of the BRCA2 gene, one from each parent. But some of us have versions of that gene that make us more prone to developing breast cancer.
Alright, time to talk some DNA misconceptions and how we can try and break them down!
First up, myths about dominant and recessive traits.
This one hurts, because I thought a lot of these were true for a while!
Often when learning about genetics, we learn that things like tongue-rolling, attached earlobes, and PTC tasting are pure dominant/recessive traits. They're simple, easy traits to demonstrate in a classroom.
But unfortunately, many of them aren't really true dominant/recessive traits! There's a great website called "Myths of Human Genetics" by John H. McDonald at the University of Delaware that breaks down where many of these myths came from: udel.edu/~mcdonald/myth…
Good morning, all! Today, we're gonna talk about the importance of SciComm in Genetics. Why genetics specifically?
Because that's what my PhD is in, so I'm biased towards it being the coolest science 😂.
BUT ALSO because I strongly believe we're all increasingly asked to make choices that involve genetics in our everyday lives, and I want to equip everyone with the vocabulary to feel comfortable making these choices, from getting a DNA test at the doctor to understanding GMOs.
And while I've believed this for a long time, it was thrown into an incredible spotlight over the past few years, as things like PCR and RNA became household words. Imagine my delight as I saw RNA trending, and then the sadness as I found threads full of misinformation.