Barry Ritholtz Profile picture
Jun 12, 2021 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Study:

• 1992-2006, >75% of all day-traders quit w/i 2 years
• Negative Aggregate performance of all traders over 15-years.
• Only 1 out of 100 day traders earned profits over time

Are ya feeling lucky?
bit.ly/3gquFDX Image
What's so pernicious from a trader's perspective is: YOU CAN MAKE MONEY DAY-TRADING!!! but the odds are you will give it back plus most of your starting capital. Greed only sees the all-caps teaser while ignoring the lower-case reality.
See this US example:

Individual investors pay a tremendous performance penalty for active trading. From 1991 to 1996, of 66,465 household with discount brokerage trading accounts, those trading the most earned 11.4%/year vs 17.9% for the market's returns

faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/odean/papers%2…
"When Day Traders Do Well, It’s Probably Just Luck"

There are exceptions, most notably, Jim Simons + the Medallion Fund, whose returns since 1987 are 2,091,747%

wsj.com/articles/when-… Image
Here is the thing:

You Are Not Jim Simons (Neither am I)

ritholtz.com/2020/04/you-ar…
Nope, you are not Bill Ackman either. Or Howard Marks, Ray Dalio, Stevie Cohen, or Ken Griffin.

Maybe you are a good or even a great trader, but before you try to find that out, you should at least know how much the odds are stacked against you.
Criticisms of trading as all luck are off base; It is very hard to consistently make money

I believe the odds of becoming a high schooler becoming a professional athlete are similar to that of a day trader becoming a successful professional trader.

ritholtz.com/2011/07/how-ha…
"Free" trades are not free.

There are myriad costs built in. Just because you don't see the $7 cost for trade execution does not mean it's not built-in.

Think about wider spreads, paying up to the ask or selling to the bid.

Free is expensive
You can pay a premium + get privacy, elegance + a premium solution

Or you can get the product for free & they figure out a way to monetize you as a user

via @profgalloway

"There is a basic, fundamental foundation upon which all economics is built: everything has a cost. There is no free lunch. Everything has a cost, at times, it can be hidden from view."

ritholtz.com/2018/10/cheap-…
Trading firms earn money generating trades (duh). But of all of these, the one I would least call a "passive trading outfit" is Robinhood . . .

nypost.com/2021/06/12/how…
Note: many of the ideas here have been detailed by lots of people who have thought long and hard about this.

See e.g., @safalniveshak (I linked to this in my daily reads last week); he pointed me to that research paper referenced up top.

safalniveshak.com/is-day-trading…
My colleague @dollarsanddata addressed the topic as well -- his thoughtful approach to using data to tell a story is ever-present.

ofdollarsanddata.com/is-there-a-bet…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Barry Ritholtz

Barry Ritholtz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ritholtz

May 19, 2023
FinTV comments I keep hearing:

1. Only 5 stocks driving markets
2. Recession is inevitable
3. Breadth is terrible
4. AI is a bubble
5. Debt ceiling = disaster
6. Problematic new lows
7. Consumers running out of money
8. Earnings will fail THIS Q
9. HH Debt!
10. Rally faltering
Let's see if I can find something to undercut each of those 10 items:
Only 5 stocks driving markets?

Then why are Equal-weighted indices doing so well?
Read 12 tweets
Mar 11, 2023
.@baldassarreted Congrats on picking up Certina as a brand -- they are wildly underappreciated.

My PH200M is a favorite daily wear -- it has a great retro flavor to it, and a wonderful mesh bracelet Image
One of the very best dive watches you can find for under $1,000. It just feels great on . . .

I always smile when a random stranger asks about it, in a way they wouldn't with a Rolex, Omega, or Tag Heuer.
I am a fan of Teddy's Youtube channel -- he avoids the overhyped stuff and has a deep knowledge of brands from Nomos to Glashutte to Junghans.

Check out:

youtube.com/@TeddyBaldassa…
Read 4 tweets
Mar 10, 2023
The Fed is Breaking Things (and it could get worse) dlvr.it/SkhPB7 Image
I interviewed Greg Becker, who was CEO of Silicon Valley Bank, in 2021...

ritholtz.com/2021/08/mib-gr…
The full transcript is here:

ritholtz.com/2021/08/transc…
Read 9 tweets
Jan 11, 2023
What drives market returns? These rolling 10-year total returns going back to 1909 (via Crestmont Research) show an average ~10% annual total return over any 10-year long period.
Ed Easterling (of Crestmont) breaks down those returns into these components: EPS, Dividend Yield, and P/E Increase (or decrease).

Note how cyclical P/E expansion/contraction is...
This is why it is important to include whether P/Es are expanding or contracting in any definition of a bull or bear market.

ritholtz.com/2017/08/redefi…
Read 7 tweets
Jan 3, 2023
Observations to Start 2023 dlvr.it/SgJkSr
It takes the Earth 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes + 9.76 seconds to complete 1 orbit – to return to the exact same place relative to the sun. Our planet has done this about 4.54 billion times.

What does this unit of time have to do with investing?

Alas, utterly nothing...
This is an example of the irrelevant nature of the calendar - I'd be curious to see what the data looks like for successive rolling 12-month periods rather than calendar years; it might also be more useful than using January - December periods

statista.com/chart/28401/an…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 2, 2022
Have you ever been professionally humiliated?

I have had my ass handed to me in public - sometimes deservedly, more often not - but I have never been intellectually demolished like this:

int.nyt.com/data/documentt…
The appeals court was sharply critical of the decision by Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee to intervene in the case. She lacked legitimate jurisdiction to order the review & there was no justification for treating a former POTUS differently from any other search warrant target.
"All three of the judges on the panel that ruled on Thursday were appointees of Republican presidents — and two of them, Andrew L. Brasher and Britt Grant, had been placed on the bench by Mr. Trump himself."

nytimes.com/2022/12/01/us/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(