KarenPhysioCoUk Profile picture
Jun 12, 2021 6 tweets 1 min read Read on X
Any treatment plan should be based on the best available evidence base.

So when considering exercise for ME, let’s take a look at the evidence.

A thread...
Some RCTs have shown improved subjective fatigue and physical function with graded exercise.

But there have been no demonstrable changes to objective outcome measures.

And subjective outcomes fail to remain significant in comparison to controls at 12 month follow up.
Subjectively, a review of 10 patient surveys from across the world found that 51% of respondents reported graded exercise therapy made their health worse
Objectively, the following has been found following exercise in ME

Reduced oxygenation of the prefrontal cortex

Impaired cognitive processing

Decreased pain threshold

Abnormal increases in lactic acid

Deterioration in cardiopulmonary function ...
... Decrease in general function

Early intracellular acidosis

Increased intramuscular acidosis and prolonged recovery

Early fatigue with prolonged recovery

Abnormally increased levels of oxidative stress with prolonged recovery
So when comparing the quality of evidence supporting the benefits of exercise against the range of adverse physiological effects found so far, it is logical to conclude that exercise is not an evidence based treatment for ME, and could in fact be harmful.

It's that simple.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with KarenPhysioCoUk

KarenPhysioCoUk Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @karenphysiocouk

Feb 26
There's this trend where ME is thought of like chronic pain.

Terms like “activity avoidance”, “kinesiophobia” (fear of movement) and now I guess “effort preference” are bandied about.

Less movement = deconditioning = less movement, you see.
So in chronic pain we encourage more activity. “Sore but safe” is the mantra. We can manipulate the brain’s perceptions and turn things around.

Any technique that leans on neuroplasticity – eg the lightening process – follows this thinking.
But ME is NOT chronic pain. They are completely different.

Pain may be a secondary symptom of ME but it is not the driver.

ME is NOT chronic pain.
Read 8 tweets
Feb 24
Finally had a chance to look at this big ME study reported so excitedly in the news. It's a little... underwhelming.

Let's have a look.

First off, the total number of participants was... 17

nature.com/articles/s4146…
For comparison, our home based physiological testing feasibility study also had 17 participants. We recruited this number within 48 hours and could have done more if we had the resources.

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Anyway, the big fancy study found #pwme had increased HR during the day and during the night, suggesting "diminished parasympathetic activity".

Yeah, we found this too. As have several other studies - that isn't a new thing.
Read 9 tweets
Nov 15, 2022
Since N=1 seems to be scientific enough to be published by esteemed journals and reported in major newspapers, I'd like to add my own idea.

Dec 2020: I had a wine advent calendar. No Covid.
Dec 2021: I did not have a wine advent calendar. I caught Covid.

Wine prevents Covid.
Now, if you disagree with this statement then you’re perpetuating the body/wine dualism and are part of the problem.

I have plenty of quality research by The Great British Wine Company that supports my assertion.
If you tell me that wine can actually be quite harmful to some people, I would reply that this is unproven. Those people are merely self-reporting. Where’s the real data?
Read 7 tweets
Oct 15, 2021
With the #NICE roundtable happening on Monday to discuss concerns over the updated #ME guidelines, let me address a key concern about removing GET - that there would be a "reduction in services".

Here's what a specialist ME service could do without GET.../1
Take basic objective measurements, like HR and BP, using them in tests like the NASA Lean test to screen for orthostatic intolerances and refer on as required /2
batemanhornecenter.org/wp-content/upl…
Use Heart Rate monitors to take 2 weeks of baseline data alongside an activity diary, then use that data to;
a) identify stressors (& provide adaptive aids to modify these)
b) re-organise activities to allow for restorative rest
Read 13 tweets
Oct 13, 2021
Q for those with more in-depth knowledge of PACE...

One of the primary Outcome Measures was the "physical function subscale" of the SF-36.

I can't see anywhere an explanation of how they totalled up the scores from this...
... but this fascinating review looking at the use of the SF-36 notes that scoring requires the use of special algorithms, and has found a massive discrepancy in how studies have chosen to use it and tried to score it...
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
... the review concludes: "In our opinion, calculating a SF-36 Total/Global/Overall Score is a measurement bias (a systematic error) that can lead to a measure with poor validity... (cont)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(