Spain's initial attacking structure can be seen below.
Sweden allow Spain the wide areas because the central areas & half spaces are void of any Spanish players in the middle third & Swedish final third.
Sweden welcome crosses from Spain because they're easy to defend.
Pedri was too deep in possession, while Morata received little service despite sitting between the defensive and midfield lines.
Pedri should have been instructed to take an advanced role in the left half-space bc left sided Spanish players are capable of beating the #SWE press.
Spain would have Llorente and Koke rotate between midfield and right fullback roles. This is done in an attempt to disrupt Sweden's man-marking/zonal marking system.
Spain can force 2v2s in the wide areas, but can clog the half-spaces that an inside Spanish player may be in.
Sweden can guide Spain's play by leaving a Spanish player open to receive a pass.
In the example below, it's Llorente. He isn't shielded by anyone and Berg rarely pressed him immediately.
So, by forcing Spain to play in the areas that they want, Sweden take a lot of the thought out of their pressing scheme.
Sweden:
- Crowd the half-spaces; leaving no inside passing options
- Press the wide areas to force Spain to move the ball backwards
Spain also failed to take advantage of the few chances that they did create.
Sweden's defensive structure was remarkable.
Eventually, Spain had Rodri and Koke/Llorente enter the middle third, so Isak & Berg shielded them, preventing Rodri and Koke/Llorente from being viable forward and central passing options.
When play shifted to the left, Spain forced a 2v2 that Sweden were capable of defending.
However, the left half-space often contained 3 Spanish players and 3 Swedish players, meaning that it was far too crowded for any clear chances to be created.
If Spain moved play to the right it was defended in a similar manner to how it is on the left. The difference is that Rodri & Morata rarely came close to the right half-space.
Right side chance creation was scarce and for good reason. If Spain win the 2v2, they'd lose the 3v1.
Finally, here is the Swedish low-block in motion.
Possession without results in pointless. Spain could not beat a well organized Swedish defense. Centrally, out wide and in the half-spaces, Sweden prevented Spain from creating many high quality chances.
So, Sweden earned a very deserved draw. Playing as conservatively as Sweden did often leads to a negative reception from fans, however, there is much that can be learned from this world-class Swedish performance.
If you've enjoyed this thread, consider following and retweeting it as we will be doing post match threads for all the games during #EURO2020 , as well as match previews for all the upcoming match days on our website: pythagorasinboots.com/euro-2020/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Giovanni Leoni - ULTIMATE Scout Report (Video v Data)
Big, physical, proactive and a real presence inside the box but can he play ball or is he an Italian De Ligt? I was taken aback by what I saw.
Let’s break down what he brings and what he doesn’t - for Liverpool 👇
#LFC
Aerial Ability (Eye Test)
💪 6ft 4 at age 18 allied with an explosive spring, strong shoulders, on paper complete package aerially.
⚡ Quick off the mark, inside the box - can make the first step and get in ahead meeting the ball first
🔍 Reads trajectory EXTREMELY well and adjusts positioning
Summary: Premier league ready in terms of aerial ability. He would relish a battle with a forward who is a brute inside the box... and if Liverpool are defending deep, facing a bombardment of crosses at the death - holding on to a lead... Leoni is an asset.
Aerial Ability (Data)
📈 64.5% aerial duels won
🥅 0.07 headed goals per 90
✅ Outperform - Araujo, De Ligt
Summary: High win rate makes him reliable in defensive set-piece scenarios AND adds attacking threat at corners which could prove valuable for Liverpool in tight matches away from home where set-pieces decide games.
➡️ Ideal foil for Slot system
➡️ Trivela pass from LIF = tap in by Mo
➡️ Can drift deep & rotate with Mo
➡️ Becomes 4321 with Salah CF IP
➡️ Encouages LFC to dominate territory
➡️ Fast combo with Wirtz edge of box
A THREAD 🧵
#LiverpoolFC
1️⃣ Telstar Index Breakdown
✅ A high-level carrier
✅ A high-level connector
✅ A natural provider
This makes him perfect for Salah. He drops deep, feeds runners, links play.
Mo shifts from wide support to central finisher… the ideal foil in a two-man frontline.
2️⃣ The 4-3-2-1 Shift
A 4-3-2-1 rather than a 4-2-3-1 could make Salah more efficient in terms of pitch coverage. Saves his ageing legs - not that there is any sign of slowdown yet.
With Frimpong + Robertson holding width, Salah finally plays inside, not stuck wide like with Trent.
Ekitike can also take up LIF position which allows Liverpool to go diamond, put another body into midfield and make their attack even more unpredictable.
Club World Cup Preview [Thread]
Is this a lopsided competition dominated by Europe or can we find some hidden gems in the global game?
Are Messi's Inter Miami overrated? And which Minnows can win the tournament?!
Let's use ELO to answer those questions 📊
by @sjatfkb
What is ELO? 🤔
Imagine every team has a ‘strength score that ticks up or down after each match—unexpected wins move the needle more.
Created by Árpád Elo, it’s great for tracking who’s hot or cold. It's commonly used in chess but we can apply it to Football
So what does the ELO landscape look like?
As you'd expect the Big 5 leagues lead the way in terms of overall league strength. But what becomes apparent is that certain leagues have outlier teams punching above their weight - and several are heading to the CWC.
- Regardless of formation, he should feature centrally
- With freedom to roam wide, deep and in behind
- Why him?
- Post Salah, he becomes the spinal figure...
- This another VVD/Alisson moment - core component
A THREAD 👇
#LFC
If we look at Liverpool's chief creators outside of Trent, and even Trent for that matter we can see there is no one who truly masters creative play in the efficient or pure volume sense.
Salah, Mac Allister, Szobo have elements but it is a collective excercise.
Through balls in particular, Liverpool don't really use them super precisely to open up sides.
Wirtz on the other hand is a master of killer passing. He's a chance creation machine whose looking to slide balls in and unlock defences. He is a true 10 and a throwback maestro who takes it on himself to supply his team mates.
It’s often forgotten that some of the most successful managers of all time were methodical, quiet types who lacked the bombast and charisma of your Sir Alex Ferguson or Jose Mourinho types.
Who were ‘The Quiet Ones’?
A THREAD 🧵
Bob Paisley – The Reluctant Genius
Bob Paisley never sought the limelight, yet he became the most successful British manager of his era. Unlike his predecessor, Bill Shankly, who was a charismatic force of nature, Paisley was quiet, reserved, and often seemed uncomfortable in the public eye. But beneath his modest exterior lay a footballing genius who took Liverpool to unprecedented heights. While Shankly had built Liverpool’s foundation, Paisley elevated them to a European powerhouse, securing six league titles and three European Cups in just nine years. His ability to transition Liverpool into a ruthless, efficient machine without the need for grand speeches or media battles made his success all the more remarkable.
Paisley’s strength was his deep tactical understanding and unparalleled eye for talent. He made seemingly understated signings—Kenny Dalglish, Graeme Souness, Alan Hansen—that turned into club legends. His teams were defined by their intelligence, fluidity, and an ability to win without fuss, mirroring his own personality. Where other managers sought control through intimidation or sheer presence, Paisley operated in the background, subtly guiding his players to play the Liverpool way. His success was so seamless that it was sometimes overlooked, as he never courted attention or sought to build a personal legacy.
Even in retirement, Paisley remained understated, resisting the urge to claim credit for Liverpool’s dominance. He proved that a manager didn’t need an overpowering aura to build a dynasty—just a deep understanding of the game, an ability to evolve, and a quiet confidence in their methods. Though often overshadowed by more outspoken figures, his record remains untouchable: he is still the only British manager with three European Cups. While others may have been more charismatic, few were as quietly effective as Bob Paisley.
Vicente del Bosque – The Anti-Galactico
Vicente del Bosque was never the loudest voice in the room, nor did he seek to impose himself on players. Yet, through quiet authority and remarkable tactical balance, he built one of the most successful teams in history. At Real Madrid, he managed a dressing room filled with superstars—Zidane, Figo, Ronaldo, Raul—without ever making himself the centre of attention. While Madrid is a club notorious for its political infighting and managerial turnover, Del Bosque provided stability, guiding them to two Champions League titles and multiple domestic honours. Despite this success, he was dismissed in 2003 for lacking charisma—an irony, given that Madrid spiralled into years of turbulence after his departure.
His greatest achievement, however, came with Spain’s golden generation. Taking over in 2008, Del Bosque inherited a team fresh off their first major trophy in decades but ensured their dominance continued. Unlike other managers who sought to impose rigid tactical philosophies, he allowed Spain’s natural talent to flourish, refining their tiki-taka system rather than revolutionising it. Under his quiet leadership, Spain won the 2010 World Cup and Euro 2012, becoming the first team in history to win three consecutive international tournaments. While other managers might have demanded more credit, Del Bosque remained in the background, letting his players take the spotlight.
His humility was both his greatest strength and the reason some undervalued his achievements. Del Bosque’s teams were never about him—they were about the collective. He proved that a manager didn’t need an overpowering presence to command respect; they simply needed a clear vision, trust in their players, and the wisdom to guide rather than dictate. Though he never sought to be a legend, his record speaks for itself.