The Chinese Communist Party has blocked Western internet companies from accessing their domestic market for years.
Now, others are following in their footsteps.
Nigeria banned Twitter for deleting a tweet from the president.
India raided Twitter's office in New Delhi.
We can't return to the libertarian days of the early internet (nor would we want to).
But leaders need to defend and promote the values of the free and open internet, while taking targeted measures to address privacy concerns, hate speech, and foreign interference in elections.
If liberal democracies don't coordinate on regulation, then we will get one of two very bad outcomes:
1) The Chinese model will win out & we'll get a true splinternet
2) Liberal democracies just default to the most restrictive set of regulations (the "Brussels effect")
We need to act fast because the playbook of "shut down the internet during a crisis" is picking up steam.
And through the Belt and Road Initiative, China has been willing to invest in developing countries to a degree the West hasn't.
Why is there no US/UK competitor to Huawei?
Here's a few places to start:
1. Invest $450 billion in closing the digital divide.
Prioritize investments in satellite broadband (Starlink, OneWeb, Viasat, and SES).
These are quasi-censorship resistant and easier to roll out globally than physical infrastructure.
2. Incentivize investment in servers and core infrastructure, including building out content delivery networks (CDNs) to increase internet consumption.
3. Make public investments in artificial intelligence R&D that shapes the competitive terrain to be compatible with liberal values.
For example, machine learning techniques like simulation learning and one-shot learning require less real world data — and fewer privacy concerns.
4. Double down on the Internet Society and create a more ambitious vision for the future of internet protocols.
A new collection of 16 essays on how to accelerate AI for science & security: ifp.org/launch
The AI revolution is already delivering enormous consumer benefits. But AI progress won't automatically solve humanity's most important problems first. To get the future we want, we need to shape the trajectory of AI progress.
This series is a step toward that future…
1. @fiiiiiist, @taoburr, and @timhwang have an intro essay on how to actually shape AI progress: ifp.org/preparing-for-…
2. @AdamMarblestone & @Andrew_C_Payne on how to map the mammalian brain’s connectome to solve fundamental problems in neuroscience, psychology, and AI robustness: ifp.org/mapping-the-br…
Our organizations don’t agree on everything (e.g., tariffs), but we do agree there are immediate steps we can take to boost industrialization & innovation.
We shouldn’t imitate Beijing’s playbook — America succeeds by leveraging our own advantages.
US innovation does not rely on top-down economic mandates, forced tech transfers, or intellectual property theft.
What we do need is the same level of seriousness that China brings to its techno-industrial agenda.
A serious country wouldn't allow red tape to delay critical investments worth hundreds of billions.
A serious country wouldn’t educate the world's brightest minds only to send them away.
A serious country wouldn't cut core investments in science — but would instead target them toward high-risk, high-reward opportunities.
We can make different choices.
We can revitalize our industrial base, scale up our scientific capabilities, and build a military to deter emerging threats.
Here are the 27 proposals to make it happen… 🧵
We have 8 proposals on frontier science & technology:
1. @calebwatney on launching x-labs for science
2. @timhwang and @JoshuaTLevine on foreign data flows for AI
3. @sophiabrownh and @r_zwetsloot on reforming federal hiring
4. @LarsESchonander on reforming the SBIR program
5. @fiiiiiist on special compute zones
6. Brady Helwig and @arrian_ebrahimi on the national semiconductor technology center