Are you more influential than you think?
A little test.
(I'm about to make you feel really good)
This exercise may help you understand how powerful Gender Critical twitter accounts are, and why we keep being censored.
Have you ever checked your "engagement rate"? No?
It's a metric used to see how much people engage & interact with you.
In other words, how INFLUENTIAL you are.
A simple way to calculate it is to look at the analytics data on any tweet.
And then calculate this:
Total Engagements
÷
Total Impressions
x 100
This gives you the
'engagement rate'
It's the percentage that saw your tweet and then actively engaged with you, (likes, retweets, replies etc) instead of ignoring and scrolling on by with a 'meh'
What's an average, and what's a good engagement rate on twitter?
According to socialinsider.io the average engagement rate per tweet in 2020 was:
0.07%
(They divide engagements by Followers, instead of by Impressions, but it's a similar metric)
According to rivaliq.com, the average engagement rate per tweet for industries, is 0.045%
Those are averages. And they are a very small fraction of a single percent.
What's considered good?
Most would consider an engagement rate above 0.5% to be good for Twitter.
Anything over 1% is so far above average as to be considered a great Twitter engagement rate.
If one in a hundred people that see your tweet actually find it interesting enough to stop and interact in any way?
Score.
You're doing well, you are much more influential than average.
People are listening to you.
Want to know your own influence now?
Here's what you do:
Click this 👇button on any tweet you've made and do your maths.
Or, if you want to see your engagement rate for your whole page, eg forJune, log into Twitter analytics, click on the Tweets tab at the top of the page.
You can then see your Engagement Rate for your whole page (and play with date ranges) in the top box in the right-hand column.
When I was in 6th form, a girl in the year below me was in a secret relationship with the deputy head of 6th form. He was 26, my maths teacher, friendly, likeable. It became one of those open secrets that we all knew.
And as teenagers, we 'knew' we were old enough, cool enough, mature enough and adult enough to handle such relationships if we chose them for ourselves, right?
I mean, you're practically an adult at 16, and this teacher was young and nice. Parents can be so square.
Right?
I remember my older brother and I being coy about our knowledge of the relationship when our mum, who was a school governor, quizzed us. We didn't want to get anyone into trouble.
They went on to marry eventually. As far as I know they're probably still together decades later.
Let me 'unrohypnol' this for a second. I'm almost completely sure this thread won't be seen by him, and can't possibly hurt his feelings, so I'm going to use the name Gavin to see if it clarifies anything.
Are people being 'needlessly cruel' to Gavin? Has he been gracious?
I think not on both counts.
Gavin's a grown man. He's not a child, and he's not even a young adult. He's in his forties. A middle aged man. Old enough to have a strong concept of fairness.
He's led a charmed, millionaire's life. He's had his identity shielded by a judge after he caused life changing injuries for a man and woman through reckless driving. The justification for that anonymity was that he was training for the Olympics. The punishment was trivial.
About NHS single sex wards.
Let me explain something.
The 2010 policy which is called "Eliminating Mixed Sex Accommodation" (MSA) is based upon Gender, NOT sex.
It's CALLED sex.
That's the PR.
But it is based on gender.
And it involves financial fines for breaches.
What this means is that a true single sex ward IS AT RISK OF BEING FINED if a patient declares a 'gender' that differs from sex.
We have the astonishing situation that the hospital are financially penalised for preserving a single sex wards.
Because 'gender', not sex.
All the other patients who haven't yet declared an identity, blithely assuming that they are being accommodated by their sex?
Nope.
Their 'gender' is assumed of them.
Of you, as an NHS patient.
That is what is on their medical records. "Current Gender".
A short while ago I visited Primark with my teen, and she tried on some clothes. It became apparent that their changing rooms were also mixed. However, when you entered the changing area, there was one room with cubicles to the left, and another room to the right.
And the assistant was carefully and without commenting why, directing one sex left, and the other sex right, whilst loudly warning us NOT to come out of our cubicles undressed or to show outfits whilst in the changing rooms.
She also was urging mothers and daughters, or girl friend groups to share family cubicles, presumably to free up as many individual cubicles on each side at a time, so that she wasn't forced to direct girls over to the side with a man already in it.
@TomasBogardus If you're looking for real life objections to using pronouns that accurately reflect the subject's sex, the true essence of what I really encounter distills to this:
You verbally acknowledging the reality of my sex breaks the social contract I expect you to obey.
@TomasBogardus My expectation is that you will elevate my fantasy over reality. The impact of that on others is that they will follow suit, reassured that the assertion of reality is permissable, and thus my fantasy is diminished. This act of defiance by you breaks the illusory power I hold.
@TomasBogardus I want the power to compel what may and may not be said. The only thing sustaining societal compliance with an obvious untruth; "call me female, though we both know I am male" is the communal belief that I have the power to compel this.
Dissent must therefore be crushed.
We do not have an Act to recognise racism - for it would indeed be racism - to 'identify' as a race we are not, based upon racist stereotypes we treasure of race 'psyche' or race aesthetics.
We would understand it is demeaning to people of genuine ethnicities were we to ratify false, stereotypical, racial characteristics into law about them, as a means to facilitating entry of an imposter into their group.