10-K Diver Profile picture
Jun 27, 2021 25 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the benefits of turning capital quickly.

The math behind turning capital is beautiful. It leads us to the number "e", which plays a vital role in so many different fields -- from astrophysics to biology.
2/

Imagine we have $1M.

Also, we know an extraordinarily generous bank where we can deposit this $1M.

This bank will pay us interest. And not a paltry 1% or 2%, but a hefty *100%* per year!

(I know, I know. But humor me, will you?)
3/

So, if we deposit our $1M at this bank, it will earn that 100% interest and become $2M in 1 years' time.

But that's *only* if the interest is *compounded annually*.
4/

What if the interest is *not* compounded annually?

For example, suppose it's compounded half yearly?

"Compounded half yearly" means: instead of paying us 100% interest *once* a year, the bank pays us 50% interest *twice* a year (ie, once every 6 months).
5/

That is, we get to "turn" our money twice -- each time earning 50% on it.

Here's a quick picture of how that looks.

The first 6 months will turn $1M into $1.5M (ie, +50%). And the second 6 months will turn this $1.5M into $2.25M (another +50%). Image
6/

So, compounding half yearly works out *better* for us than compounding annually.

Half yearly means we end up with $2.25M after 1 year.

Annually means we end up with only $2M in the same 1 year.
7/

This is a *fundamental* fact about turning capital.

In general, the more quickly we can turn our capital, the higher our return will be.
8/

For example, the picture below shows how much we end up with if we turn our capital even faster.

As the table shows, *quarterly* is even better than *half yearly*.

*Monthly* is even better than *quarterly*.

*Daily* is even better than *monthly*.

And so on. Image
9/

But there also seems to be a "law of diminishing returns" at work.

For example, doubling our turns from annually to half yearly netted us $250K ($2M -> $2.25M).

But doubling our turns *again*, going from half yearly to quarterly, only netted us ~$191K ($2.25M -> $2.44M).
10/

This also is a fundamental property of capital turns.

As we crank up our turns more and more, the incremental benefit we get becomes less and less.

We still get a positive benefit each time. But the benefit gets smaller as we go: Image
11/

If we dig a little deeper, we can come up with a formula.

Suppose our capital turns N times per year.

Our formula then predicts how much each $1 of our money will become after 1 year -- as a function of N.

Here's the formula and its simple derivation: Image
12/

Jacob Bernoulli was one of the first mathematicians to study this formula in the context of capital turns and compounding money.

Bernoulli's work dates all the way back to 1690!

That's when he published a paper about this formula in the journal Acta Eruditorum: Image
13/

In the paper, Bernoulli proved that the formula *converged* to a limit.

Here's what that means:

As we keep increasing the number of turns per year N, the number (1 + 1/N)^N (which is what each dollar of our money becomes after 1 year) bumps up against a hard ceiling.
14/

Bernoulli proved that this ceiling had to lie somewhere between 2.5 and 3.

That is, *no matter how fast* we turn our capital (even if we turn it every nanosecond, or a billion times faster than that), we cannot grow $1 into $3 or more in 1 year. The ceiling prevents us.
15/

We now know that the ceiling is ~$2.718 -- between $2.5 and $3 as Bernoulli knew it had to be.

*If* we turn our capital *infinitely* often, we will grow $1 into roughly $2.718 in 1 year. Not more.

There's a strong law of diminishing returns at play.
16/

This magic number (2.718281828...) is called "e".

e has a special place in mathematics.

It's one of the most important universal constants. And it turns up in all sorts of surprising places -- from probability distributions to the shapes of galaxies!
17/

For those who'd like to nerd out even more, here's a sketch of Bernoulli's proof that the limit e has to exist and that it has to lie between 2.5 and 3.

(Don't worry if you don't get this math. I promise that you won't need it to make sense of the rest of this thread!) ImageImageImageImage
18/

As I said, e plays such a vital role in so many areas beyond capital turns and compounding.

For example, the formula for the Gaussian probability distribution (known more commonly as the "bell curve") depends strongly on e: Image
19/

Another fun "curve" whose formula involves e in a big way: the famous Gateway Arch in St. Louis! Image
20/

Oh, and what if our bank paid us a more realistic interest rate -- say, R% per year?

Well, *if* we can turn our capital infinitely often, each $1 of ours becomes e^(R/100) dollars in 1 year.

I set R=100 just so the answer simplified to e dollars. But other Rs work too.
21/

I can't resist pointing out one more place where e showed up unexpectedly: in Google's IPO filing!

sec.gov/Archives/edgar…

That's e billion dollars, folks! Image
22/

If you want to learn more about the rich history behind e, and some of the math surrounding it, I recommend the book "e: The Story of A Number" by Eli Maor. It's a great read!

Amazon link: amazon.com/Story-Number-P…
23/

For more on the investing principles behind capital turns, inventory turns, and working capital management:
24/

I also very much enjoyed this Focused Compounding episode, where Andrew and Geoff discuss some of these concepts in their usual illuminating way (h/t @FocusedCompound).

~45 minute video:
25/

If you're still with me, thank you very much!

Capital turns are a key concept in compounding.

In addition to investing insights, I hope this thread also gave you an appreciation for the rich history and the beautiful math behind this topic.

Enjoy your weekend!

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

Jan 1, 2023
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through "Gambler's Ruin".

This is a classic exercise in probability theory.

But going beyond the math, this exercise can teach us a lot about life, business, and investing.
2/

In my mind, Gambler's Ruin is the math of "David vs Goliath" ("Skill vs Size") type situations.

Here, David is a "small" player. He only has limited resources. But he's very skilled.

Pitted against David is Goliath -- a "big" player who has MORE resources but LESS skill.
3/

The battle between David and Goliath rages on for several "rounds".

Each round has a "winner" -- either David or Goliath.

David -- because of his superior skill -- has a higher probability of winning any individual round. That's David's advantage over Goliath.
Read 32 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, we'll explore the question:

As investors, how often should we check stock prices?

To answer this, we'll draw on key ideas and concepts from many different fields -- probability, information theory, psychology, etc.
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC, Inc.

Every day that the market is open, our stock either:

- Goes UP 1%, or
- Goes DOWN 1%.

For simplicity, let's say these are the only 2 possible outcomes on any given trading day.
3/

Suppose we think ABC is a "good" investment.

That is, the company has a wide moat, good returns on capital, decent growth prospects, etc. And the stock trades at a reasonable price.

So, we buy the stock -- expecting to make a very good return on it. Say, ~15% per year.
Read 40 tweets
Oct 23, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through 2 key portfolio diversification principles:

(i) Minimizing correlations, and
(ii) Re-balancing intelligently.

You don't need Markowitz's portfolio theory or the Kelly Criterion to understand these concepts. Image
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC Inc. Ticker: $ABC.

The good thing about ABC is: in 4 out of 5 years (ie, with probability 80%), the stock goes UP 30%.

But the *rest* of the time -- ie, with probability 20%, or in 1 out of 5 years -- the stock goes DOWN 50%.
3/

We have no way to predict in advance which years will be good and which will be bad.

So, let's say we just buy and hold ABC stock for a long time -- like 25 years.

The question is: what return are we most likely to get from ABC over these 25 years?
Read 23 tweets
Sep 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the P/E Ratio.

Why do some companies trade at 5x earnings and others trade at 50x earnings?

When I first started investing, this was hard for me to understand.

So, let me break it down for you.
2/

Imagine we have 2 companies, A and B.

Let's say both companies will earn $1 per share next year.

And both companies will also GROW their earnings at the SAME rate: 10% per year. Every year. Forever.
3/

Suppose A trades at a (forward) P/E Ratio of 10. So, each share of A costs $10.

And B trades at a P/E Ratio of 15. So, each share of B costs $15.

Which is the better long term investment: A or B?
Read 31 tweets
Sep 4, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a fundamental business concept that may be counter-intuitive to some of you:

Just because a business has made $1 of PROFIT, it does NOT mean the business's owners have $1 of CASH to pocket.
2/

To understand why, let's start with how PROFIT is defined.

PROFIT = SALES - COSTS

That is, we take all sales (or revenues) the company made during a quarter or year.

We back out all costs incurred during this period.

That leaves us with profits.

Seems straightforward.
3/

Here's the problem:

The way a "lay person" understands words like SALES and COSTS is completely different from the way an *accountant* uses these same words.

These discrepancies can create enormous confusion.
Read 20 tweets
Aug 28, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a framework that I call "Lindy vs Turkey".

This is a super-useful set of ideas for investors.

Time and again, these ideas have helped me think more clearly about the LONGEVITY of the companies in my portfolio.
2/

Imagine we're buying shares in a company -- ABC Inc.

ABC is a very simple company. It earns $1 per share every year. These earnings don't grow over time.

And ABC returns all its earnings back to its owners -- by issuing a $1/share dividend at the end of each year.
3/

Suppose we buy ABC shares for $5 a share.

That's a P/E ratio of 5.

We know we get back $1/year as a dividend.

So, for us to NOT lose money, ABC should survive AT LEAST 5 more years.

If something happens and ABC DIES before then, we'll likely lose money.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(