Come to think of it, don't ALL the executives of Trump Org live in housing owned by Trump Org? It seems like that might be a tangible, taxable perquisite. businessinsider.com/donald-trump-p…
Just as I thought (now that I'm thinking about it) - housing is a taxable fringe benefit unless fairly strict exceptions apply. corporatehousing.com/blog/corporate…
OK, this indictment is SUPER FUN. They had a whole scheme to avoid federal, state and local taxes of which Weisselberg was "one of the" biggest beneficiaries. Reading now: documentcloud.org/documents/2098… h/t @clearing_fog
So typical of tax evaders - they won't even pay their own cable bill.
So typical of Trump - engage in a criminal scheme and it's not even a bonus to the employee - it's a deduction from his compensation, tracked on internal spreadsheets.
Dmbfx was engaged in a criminal scheme to avoid paying tax on $100,000 per year ... so the direct benefit to him was on $35,000 per year. I haven't seen what his full pay was, but I am sure it was over $1,000,000. So he's going down for pennies on the dollar.
For all those asking how Trump gets people to commit crimes for him, and then take the rap for him ... Weisselberg was engaged in a criminal conspiracy. I've said it before - Trump chooses to surround himself with criminals he can control.
Indictment moves on to payment for tuition for Weisselberg's grandkids. WHO PAID BARON'S TUITION?
One thing is clear, the NYAG has spreadsheets that Trump Org used to track internal, untaxed compensation for Weisselberg and his son. Betcha money that Ivanqa is on there.
"two other" Trump Org employees knowingly received off books housing and cars and also failed to pay NY City tax.
NYAG tags Wollman Rink, Mar a Lago, and other entities as engaging in a scheme to disguise regular income as (tax withheld) non-employee compensation (for which tax is not withheld).
Weisselberg's annual compensation was $940,000. That's pretty low for a CFO of a major developer based in NY. What a fool.
And there's at least one unindicted co-conspirator.
All accounts that I have ever heard of the Trump Org confirm that he tracked every dime that went in or out. Hopefully there is proof that he knew about this system and signed off it. Here's to that. Dirk out.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is my response to everyone's ridiculous takes about how the DoJ shouldn't defend the office of the POTUS from sex assault allegations. The evils are ALREADY teeing up sex assault allegations against Biden. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden…
Sure we don't want Trump being defended by the DoJ. BUT IT'S NOT TRUMP BEING DEFENDED BY THE DOJ IT'S THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT FROM ATTACKS BY THE EVILS.
And it's not even sex assault allegations that are being defended. It's the denial - the words - which every politician has to be entitled to do if someone makes an allegation against them.
@BarbMcQuade is a formidable legal mind and this article is quite good. Nevertheless, here is DIRK'S HOT TAKE EXPLAINING WHY THE TWITTER MOB AND BARB ARE WRONG ON THIS POINT.
(I nevertheless take a moment to note I too am frustrated with the glacial pace of justice regarding the obvious trumpist crime wave of the past couple of years)
Key Point One: Ms. Carrol's suit is not about the attack she endured at Trump's hands back in the day. It alleges that Trump lied about the attack when she came forward about it in 2019. THE DOJ IS NOT DEFENDING A RAPE CASE.
What Durham is doing is one of the great mysteries of the Barr era. I still think there's an above-zero chance he finds the opposite of Trumpists want, but I am less confident now that we know RR and O'Callaghan were turned. $1.5M is not a lot of money, really.
If you wanna don the Rose Coloreds ... we now know that Rosenstein and O'Callaghan ventured right up to the edge (and maybe beyond) of obstruction as Barr came aboard as AG. Durham is authorized to prosecute any crimes related to the Mueller investigation.
And we know that O'Callaghan was in the NATSEC division up until RR elevated him to supervise the Russia investigation. Durham is empowered to investigate "intelligence, counter-intelligence or law enforcement activities." justice.gov/file/1370931/d…
As attorneys, we are trained from the beginning that attorney-client privilege is our most sacred trust. We should go to jail to protect it, we should NEVER violate that trust voluntarily.
The Court's decision was that there were portions of the memo that were after-the-fact cover for a decision already made, and that some was mere political advice -- those parts will be released.
It's tempting, but a terrible mistake, to say "men should sit down and shut up" on this issue. At least 40% of US women are "pro-life" news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pr…
Combatting the pro-life movement therefore requires a coalition of liberal men and women. Telling a significant part of a coalition that their opinions don't matter is a mistake.