Veera Rajagopal  Profile picture
Jul 4, 2021 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Human genetics never ceases to amaze me. It simply blows my mind how exome sequencing at scale leads to such fascinating discoveries. I'll list the things that I loved in this thread.

Disclosure: I work for Regeneron, but I'm not involved in this study.
Here is my favorite plot that I often share in GWAS threads. Note, it took 640,000 exomes to reach sufficient statistical power to discover the large orange dot at the lower left corner, GPR75 the star of the show.
Unlike MC4R where loss of function leads to obesity, with GPR75 loss of function protects against obesity. Look at this beautiful contrast in the distribution of obese and underweight individuals in MC4R lof carriers vs GPR75 lof carriers.
GPR75 and MC4R share many characteristics.
Both belong to the largest family of membrane receptors in humans: GPCRs, which is also "considered the largest family of targets for approved drugs". Here is a pic of rhodopsin (from wikipedia) molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/93/4/2…
Both MC4R and GPR75 are highly tolerant to lof mutations with pLI=0. The current study reports 46 predicted lof mutations in GPR75.
Both MC4R and GPR75 have a simple transcript structure. Both has only one transcript that is predominantly expressed in brain. MC4R has just only one exon and GPR75 has two (45 of the 46 identified lof variants lie within exon 2)
The authors experimentally demonstrate the lof effect of two variants that were most frequent (seen at least in 10 individuals).
In vitro experiments show that these variants result in cellular retention i.e the truncated proteins fail to reach the plasma membrane and accumulate inside the cell. Beautiful!
Knocking out GPR75 in mice leads to an impressive resistance to high fat diet induced weight gain. Not just that, the mice is also resistant to metabolic effects of HFD like glucose and insulin impairments.
The authors find protective associations with lipid and diabetes traits in humans, but they are not statistically significant. This is a nice example to appreciate the relationship between sample size, allele frequency, proximity of the phenotype to DNA and environmental effects.
Note here it's likely the BMI is proximal but the metabolic effects are distal to GPR75. Also considering the strong environmental influences on diabetes and lipid traits, detecting a statistically significant associations in humans will require extremely large sample sizes.
There are also other fascinating findings in this paper who were lost in the shadow of GPR75 findings and got minimal attention.
One of the cohorts analyzed in this paper is MCPS, which comprise of ~96k Admixed Americans from Mexico city, which houses one of the most obese populations of the world (>36.1% of adults were obese in 2018)
thelancet.com/journals/landi…
So, obviously these individuals should be enriched for obesity related genetic mutations. The authors identified a lof missense variant in MC4R that is present 1% of the admixed Americans in Mexico, but rare elsewhere in the world.
More importantly, the prevalence of this variant raises from 1% to 3% when considering only the obese individuals suggesting MC4R deficiency is a major cause of obesity in this population.
I particularly like this paragraph. There were 17 individuals who were homozygous for this variant and none of them were normal weight, suggesting that that "homozygous MC4R deficiency might be incompatible with the maintenance of a healthy weight"
And one last finding that requires highlight is the famous FTO locus, a classic example where a GWAS variant is linked to a distal effector gene via chromatin looping.

cell.com/cell-metabolis…
Even after sequencing 640k exomes, there seems to be no evidence for rare variant associations with FTO or IRX3 or IRX5. So, if at all there are any rare variants associations here, they are likely not large, otherwise the current analysis would have detected it.
So, my take way here is, though rare variants more often pinpoint causal genes at common variants identified GWAS loci, it's not always the case. FTO locus is a good example.
Overall this is a hardcore genetics paper and perhaps a landmark discovery in the history of obesity genetics. Don't miss it. Read and enjoy the science :) Congratulation to all the authors on this impressive paper.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Veera Rajagopal 

Veera Rajagopal  Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doctorveera

Feb 15, 2024
Someone used DALL-E to create gobbledygook scientific figures and submitted them to Frontiers Journal. And guess what? The editor published it. LOL
frontiersin.org/articles/10.33…



Image
Image
Image
@MicrobiomDigest You might like this 😅
Maybe they used Midjourney, either way, it's unacceptable.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 15, 2024
A beautiful study by Nivard et al. on the direct and indirect genetic effects on school achievement shows that the indirect effects act primarily via dynastic effects rather than genetic nurture.
nature.com/articles/s4156…
An indirect effect is the association of genetic variants in parents (that are not transmitted to their offspring) with the phenotype in the offspring, which is believed to be mediated via genetic nurture.
But it could be also due to factors other than genetic nurture (that happens within a nuclear family) such as social status, wealth etc. passed down for multiple generations, often described as "dynastic effects"
Read 7 tweets
May 22, 2023
GWAS of structural variants in 5213 cases and 4132 controls identifies a common 309bp intronic deletion in TPCN1 as a new risk variant for Lewy body dementia.

Kaivola et al. @CellGenomics
cell.com/cell-genomics/… Image
This locus has been previously linked to Alzheimer's and Parkinson's via SNP-based GWASs. While the Alzheimer's SNP effect sizes at this locus were concordant with LBD effect sizes, the Parkinson's weren't. It's possible this deletion is the causal variant. Image
It's not clear which one is the causal gene though. The deletion seems to reduce a nearby gene RITA1 expression in multiple brain regions but the eQTL evidence for TPCN1 was evident only in non-brain tissue. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 5, 2023
One of the interesting findings in the recent GWAS of number of children ever born (NEB) is the discovery of a possible role of pigmentation gene MC1R (melanocortin 1 receptor) in reproduction.
While MC1R locus did not reach genome-wide significance, a gene-based test using only non-synonymous variants showed a significant association between MC1R and NEB with the effect in women > men.
Interestingly, loss of function variants didn't show a significant association with NEB suggesting a possible phenotypic heterogeneity.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 22, 2023
While I appreciate the sentiment, I am not a fan of such blind rules. Let me start with a 🧵 of some major human genetic discoveries (many translated to therapeutics) made with very few samples.
1. Association of complement factor H with AMD was discovered with mere 96 cases and 50 controls. Today many drug pipelines are in development based on this discovery.
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
2. Association of BCL11A locus with fetal hemoglobin fraction in blood was discovered based on 179 individuals. To date this is the most successful GWAS discovery to therapeutics translation.
nature.com/articles/ng2108

Read 16 tweets
Feb 20, 2023
Beautiful story of how human population genetic and proteomic studies have led to the discovery of SVEP1 as the natural ligand of the receptor PEAR1. It's been a while since I read such a fantastic paper. 🧵
nature.com/articles/s4146…
I am big fan of GWAS of molecular traits as they often reveal clear and interpretable cis and trans signals reiterating the known biology of the trait.
For e.g. a GWAS of a protein will reveal genetic variants that directly modify the protein expression in cis and also, genetic variants that indirectly modify the protein expression in trans.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(