0-15'
We have here two different pressing patterns. Italy's one, very agressive, coordinated, even risky sometimes due to spaces left from midfielders' deep runs. It forces Belgium to play wide and long balls.
Concerning Belgium's pressing, more based on placement (De Bruyne as a false 9, Lukaku and Doku as wingers ready to apply deep runs behind the defense)
Always individual marking on key player in build up (Jorginho).
Verratti knew organization issues from Belgium's midfield concerning its off-ball positioning. This kind of corridor happened many times during these 90 minutes. It could have troubled far more if Italy had been able to take advantage of this.
To counter this low block, Italy implemented a relevant strategy : Verratti and Jorginho (especially during 2nd half) took it a step further to create this malleable triangle and have a constant 3V3 opposition, which jeopardized Belgium a lot.
Now lets have a look on both teams off-ball defensive animation: concerning Belgiums, tightened lines, 5-3-2 when the ball is in their mid 3rd, and a 3-4-3 when the ball is in their attacking 3rd
KDB's role was to watch on Jorginho when he was back to goal
Italy's off ball animation had two main objectives : trap Tielemans, key player concerning breaking lines with vertical passes, and force ball carrier to play wide. KDB is individually marked and has few possibilities to get the ball
15-30'
Both teams have two sublime strikers concerning back to goal behavior. This time, Immobile and Lukaku failed many passes that led to dangerous counter attacks and allowed vertical transitions. Two examples below⤵️
Lukaku's back to goal pass unprecise
Barella's ability to break lines thanks to Wistel's useless pressure
Wide open area for Insigne and Immobile
Immobile 3V1 difficult to deal with
Alderweireld's anticipation
Jorginho constrained to press KDB
Wide open space for Lukaku and a dangerous 3V3
Belgium's rare fast transitions were always dangerous, and Lukaku played a central role in it, doing diagonal runs in order to attract Chiellini and let the space wide open for KDB to shoot.
30-45'
During this tournament, Insigne-Spinazzola's pair has been one of the most efficient of the Euro. Let's focus on how this associations works.
First of all, in their mid 3rd :high positioning, inverted positions, waiting for Bonucci's accuracy.
In the attacking third, traditional central repositioning of Insigne, but still keeping a reachable passing angle to Spina.
Opponent's defensive organization is troubled due to this very high position of Spinazzola.
45-60'
Same objectives for Italy's midfield : counter this low block by creating this malleable triangle as shown in the first part of this thread. This time, Jorginho is the key part of this triangle.
In addition, this triangle creation is confirmed by Jorginho's passing area, located on this left side on the pitch (source : @CalcioDatato)
60-75'
Another way to counter Belgium's low block that Portugal didn't manage to : Finding passing angles from full-backs. Di Lorenzo is a key asset concerning this discipline.
Concerning Belgium's pressing during this second half, far higher, more accompanied by Witsel and Tielemans, not letting Jorginho or Verratti feeling free to move and pass the ball
How to keep the ball high and under pressure? Jorginho and Verratti gave us many answers, including this one, with one touch passing.
Italian fullbacks, as we have seen, use to place into a high position to jeopardize defensive organization.
But in case of counter attack, tactical replacement is remarkable
75-90'
Need to speak about Doku's driblling skills : provoked one penalty, and unbalanced italian's defense, when belgiums pushed to get a draw. This young player was far more efficient concerning breaking lines with dribbles and runs than Hazard.
Even if each belgium attack has been dangerous, this low block pattern limited the potential of their creators like De Bruyne or Tielemans. Pass combinations is a good example to showcase as well (Source : @__ElJdP )
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Chelsea's game against Sheffield showed the key points Pochettino has targeted to improve concerning final third efficiency. More fluidity, and better space creation to draw out defenders and then penetrate penalty box.
⤵️🧵
It's easier to break defensive lines in final third when players shorten distances between them. I have seen many times Caicedo, Badiashile, Palmer being ready to combine with short passes and force Sheffield defense to make a decision : foul, leave space..
A thing I wanted to see more : Badiashile has excellent ball-carrying abilities. Seeing him breaking lines with his runs frequently is definitely something Pochettino has to emphasize on training sessions. Even if Sheffield had a solid defense yesterday, that was efficient.
Aston Villa impressed against Manchester City, in every aspect of the game. In possession, the ability to draw out the opposition into their own defensive third, to create space behind, is really efficient, relying on Pau Torres excellent pass quality.
🧵⤵️
Once the press is bypassed, Aston Villa don’t do much passes : direct way of play with lots of runs in behind with Watkins and Bailey, Man City has been frequently caught behind the defense.
In midfield, while some teams have a double pivot with one player as #6 and another as #8, Emery strongly insists to have both Kamara and Douglas Luiz with short distance to combine quickly, and keep this pass channel alive no matter the cost.
Chelsea has improved in first phase of build-up, and we have seen it against Arsenal. Enzo Fernandez anticipated well Arsenal’s high pressing and moved cleverly to cover the tracks against man-oriented press.
🧵⤵️
Chelsea utilizes more wide positions to progress in build-up. It eased out Enzo’s moves. Given Rice frequently anticipated the pass to Caicedo, Cucurella and Gusto had interesting diagonal passes to make behind Arsenal’s pressing.
Chelsea also improves its build-up because of wingers drop-offs. Here Mudryk dropped to ease out the build-up, especially when the opponent pin the defense back.
▫️How did he manage to man-mark Enrique’s double pivot to annihilate PSG’s build-up plan ?
BIG THREAD 🧵⤵️
We all know Newcastle tends to implement an aggressive and high pressing structure. The question we all asked was if Howe will repeat the same plan against PSG ? 18 seconds needed : individual press, Isak pressing CBs and Bruno man-marking Ugarte
Newcastle only started to press when ball carrier did a wide pass to the fullback. In that case, they switch into a 4-5-1 covering vertical passes and man-marking Ugarte.
🔵 How did Mitoma change Brighton’s offensive strategy against Bournemouth, showing how important the winger is for Roberto de Zerbi ?
THREAD ⤵️🧵
As soon as second half started, Brighton implemented those kick-offs pressing, and recovered the ball high. Mitoma, a winger who usually sticks the touchline, tends to cut inside and have intelligent positioning in penalty box, this little move on the equalizer illustrates well.
Mitoma offers more fluidity on the left flank, thanks to the automatisms created with Estupinian. This triangle with Ansu Fati created some troubles in Bournemouth defensive plan. Mitoma can drop-off and take depth quickly, making his individual marking difficult.
▫️Arsenal’s high and suffocating pressing structure
▫️Tottenham’s braveness and courage in first phase of build-up
BIG THREAD 🧵⤵️
Arteta studied well Postecoglou’s first phase of build-up , and decided to implement (as many home games) an aggressive and high pressing, Odegaard as the conductor (we will go through that point later. Spurs CB took wide positions to create more space in the center for Bissouma
Bissouma, thanks to his excellent press resistance, is the key player in first build-up phase. Vieira automatically jumped to him as soon as he got the ball. Maddison dropped off to have more Spurs players in those important moments in build-up.