β They enable students to spend less time thinking about the *process* of their learning and more time thinking about the *content* of their learning.
π§΅...
First, let's zoom out a bit. Routines can be both behavioural and/or instructional:
β’ Behavioural routines (eg. classroom entry) create more time and space for learning.
β’ Instructional routines (eg. cold call) make learning more efficient.
Both types bring a range of benefits:
β Reduction in behaviour management burden
β Increased student motivation, confidence and safety
β Freeing up of teacher mental capacity to monitor learning and be more responsive
But imho the main benefit is how they shift the balance of attention:
Routines enable students to spend less time thinking about the *how* of their learning, so they can spend more time thinking about the *what* of their learning βοΈ
They do this by stripping out decision costs, reducing the amount of novel information that needs to be processed, and employing our ability to think less about the things we repeatedly do.
They hack the attention economy of the classroom to help pupils learn things faster.
Routines are often thought of as boredom-brokers and creativity-killers, but I'm not sure this is always true...
β Effective routines can secure success and so act as an antidote to boredom.
β They also free up the precious mental capacity needed for creativity to flourish.
Caveat: I'm not saying that lessons should be formulaic.
Instead, I find it more useful to think about having a broad 'repertoire of routines' to draw upon.
This ensures that teaching can be both efficient *and* responsive: to help meet the needs of students and the curriculum.
Finally, for any PD folks who've made it this far:
A reminder that teaching teachers is just teaching: routines can be also be powerful in a PD context.
This is why instructional coaching has such potential: as a finely-tuned routine for ongoing teacher development.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ Pre-print comparing ability grouping vs mixed-ability from @JohnPeterJerrim
β finds no clear differences in student outcomes (but primary teachers feel slightly more able to help struggling and high-achieving students with ability grouping)
Norms are more powerful than rules. How to leverage this idea in school:
β
Norms are the unwritten rules that govern the behaviour and attitudes of a group (such as a society or school).
They are so powerful that they tend to override more formal rules or policies. Which is why, in schools, we ignore them at our peril.
The power of norms arises from two main mechanisms:
1/ Life is complex and uncertain.
Adopting the behaviours and attitudes of others is a quick and safe bet. This is why authors (like me) strive to get quotes on the front of our books and 5-star reviews on Amazon.
A mega-geeky thread I've been sitting on for 5 years:
β
Imagine we wanted to create a system for evaluating doctors' effectiveness.
Suppose we designed a rubric outlining all the actions effective doctors typically perform:
β Prescribe painkillers
β Refer to specialists
β Order blood tests
β Conduct physical exams
β etc.
Now imagine this system judged doctors solely on how well they fulfilled this rubric, regardless of whether these actions actually improved patient health.