Peter Kalmus Profile picture
Jul 4, 2021 28 tweets 8 min read Read on X
A thread on the op-ed I just published in the @latimes. The Times considered it important enough to also publish a separate editorial today echoing my message. And they are right. This will be a civilization-defining topic for humanity in the years ahead.
latimes.com/opinion/story/…
We all know you can't fool physics, but nowhere is that more true than in the basic, brutal thermodynamics of global heating. All the excess energy pouring into our planet due to CO2 buildup has to go somewhere. It goes into hotter temperatures, which means - worsening heatwaves.
Hundreds perished in the PNW heatwave (which we should call Heatwave ExxonMobil) and it could have been far more. When I think about the "Big One" I'm thinking of a deadly fossil-fueled heat storm, not an earthquake. It is coming - THEY are coming. We just don't know when & where
Here is a great description of what it will be like: the first chapter of Ministry for the Future by Kim Stanley Robinson.

I URGE YOU TO TAKE A FEW MINUTES RIGHT NOW TO READ IT. (@DoctorVive did a great service to humanity IMO by putting it here for free)
OK, now that you've read that, let's talk about wet bulb temperature. Meteorologists should start reporting them from now on (cc: @WeatherProf). The idea is simple: take a thermometer and put a little moisture-wicking sock over the bulb. It's called a psychrometer and costs ~$20 Image
You want good ventilation (wind) to evaporate the water (and fun fact, you can use the two readings to determine relative humidity.)

Why does this matter? Because our bodies are like the wet bulb. Our bodies don't care about heat alone, they care about moist heat.
As @AndrewDessler points out in this excellent thread, our bodies generate 100 watts (constant power output) in the form of heat, and we must dissipate that heat or else we heat up and die. When it get hot, we accomplish this by sweating.
But as humidity increases, the evaporation rate slows, and so you feel all the sweat just dripping down your back because it is not evaporating. And if it is not evaporating, it is not carrying away that heat energy from your body.
As heat and/or humidity continue to rise, at some point your body can no longer dissipate its 100 watts and your core temperature has no choice but to start increasing. Even in the shade. Even in a good breeze. Even with plenty of (ambient temperature) water to drink.
The theoretical upper limit for human thermoregulation is wet-bulb of 95°F (35°C). But many would perish if exposed to wet-bulb temps significantly lower than this - especially the elderly, children, people with underlying health conditions, and people working outside (exertion)
Until recently, it was thought that wet-bulb temps > 95°F (35°C) were not possible on Earth. But we now see them popping up here and there - infrequently, and not lasting too long. Here is a paper I link to that describes this.
advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/19/e…
And now for the bad news. If we allow the planet to keep getting hotter - if we do not rapidly end the fossil fuel industry - large swaths of the planet will become increasingly uninhabitable due to deadly humid heat beyond human tolerance.
The Global South will be hit hard but nowhere will be safe, as Heatwave ExxonMobil so dramatically showed. Here is another paper I linked to, from 2017. IMO still the best paper on projections of future deadly humid heat (though greatly needs updating). nature.com/articles/nclim…
Here are the three key figures. 1: days per year (2090-2100 mean) above a deadly humid heat threshold under "business as usual." 2: same, mostly w/o climate breakdown. 3: deadly humid heat threshold construction. ImageImageImage
These areas will not necessarily be above TW 95°F (35°C) for that many days per year... instead they will be beyond the humid heat threshold where at least someone (more likely, many someones) will die. (Above TW 95°F/35°C, most everyone exposed for more than an hour or so dies)
As I write, "Regions that routinely surpass deadly heat thresholds will become increasingly uninhabitable by humans. And long before this occurs, extreme heat, especially when coupled with climate-induced drought, will lead to ever more intense wildfires and crop failures."
The point is, as moist heat continues to steadily increase like a juggernaut, lots of people will be affected and many will be forced to become climate migrants. A billion people live in India alone.
Climate migrants in large numbers - hundreds of millions? - would have profound impacts on global geopolitics. And all of this seems like it is already starting to play out. We have to put a stop to global heating as fast as we can...
It's super important to remember that things get worse the hotter humanity allows the planet to get. It's not an on or off switch. So please don't give up, keep fighting. No matter how bad it gets it can still get worse. There is NO "new normal" 😬 (until fossil fuel is gone)
It's also super important to remember that all of this is essentially irreversible. Whatever point we let climate impacts (heat, floods, sea-level rise, fires, etc.) get to, that is where they will stay for a very long time. We will not live to see them start to get better.
It will likely stay hot for hundreds of years (or more). Sea-levels will stay high for thousands of years (or more). And biodiversity will require millions of years to recover. Also, it's an awful idea to count on "negative emissions tech" which does not, and may never, exist.
Taken altogether, this points to one inevitable conclusion: humanity MUST phase out fossil fuel as quickly as possible... not as quickly as convenient. Radical policies for ending the fossil fuel industry are not nearly as radical as they seem.
It is a no-brainer to immediately end all fossil fuel subsidies. It should ALSO be a no-brainer to immediately impose a moratorium on all new fossil fuel infrastructure - which would end Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline... which it is absolutely INSANE to be building right now.
What can you do? Become a fire-breathing climate activist! Talk about it to everyone. Get involved in direct action groups. Get to know other activists. Get creative and use all the skills and resources at your disposal. And yes, also please stop or reduce flying, eating meat etc
Please read my op-ed and share it as widely as you can! Here are the the last three graphs.
latimes.com/opinion/story/… Image
*btw, we (scientists, publishers, funding institutions) should be ensuring climate papers of potentially great public interest like this are open access at this point!
*270 million people live in Indonesia, and the whole country is dark red under RCP8.5- every day per year beyond the deadly humid heat threshold by end-of-century
BTW, here is their editorial, which came out two days after my op-ed. @latimes has excellent climate coverage in their opinion pages, and I am grateful for this. Also, unlike some newspapers - cough @NYT 🤯
- they do not publish climate deniers
latimes.com/opinion/story/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter Kalmus

Peter Kalmus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateHuman

May 8
I've long said we're at risk of losing essentially everything due to global heating - all of modern life, much of life on Earth, billions of human lives, our super habitable planet. More and more climate scientists are coming to see this. Please start listening
Elected and corporate "leaders" continue to prioritize their personal power and wealth at the cost of irreversible loss of essentially everything, even as this irreversible loss comes more and more into focus. I see this as literally a form of insanity theguardian.com/environment/ar…
I love this: “The world’s response to date is reprehensible – we live in an age of fools.” I also often refer to the rich and powerful as fools, because as their actions demonstrate they absolutely are. Capitalism tends to elevate the worst among us into the seats of power
Read 5 tweets
Sep 13, 2023
Dear journalists of the world: We are at risk of losing basically everything. This - what we're experiencing now - is how that process unfolds. The more fossil fuels we burn, the further in that process we go.

You MUST begin to tell 5 critical truths. Civilization depends on it.
When you report on climate-related disasters, make the following connections very clear. They are all true, and critical parts of your story anyway. To leave them out is poor journalism:

1. Global heating played a role (describe role). Even this is still often omitted!
2. Global heating is caused by burning fossil fuels

3. This impact and others will continue to get worse as more fossil fuels are burned. (You can describe the projections as to how much worse)

4. The impact is effectively irreversible, how hot it gets is how hot it stays
Read 8 tweets
Jul 9, 2023
Reminder that oil corporations have known since the 1970s that they were irreversibly destroying Spaceship Earth. They could have chosen to be part of the solution, transitioning to becoming energy corporations and ending fossil fuels. Instead, they chose to lie and block action
They are still doing so today. Right now. The people involved deserve to be in prison, and the corporations need to lose their social license to exist.
This was and is a CHOICE that some very awful humans have and are making. Reporters need to stop using the passive voice. It's not that the planet "is heating up." It's that these awful people chose to lead us all into fossil fueled hell on Earth, just to get a little more money
Read 5 tweets
May 11, 2023
A few personal notes:
I was just at a NASA team meeting for 3 days in DC. The scientific findings are so fucked up. Experts on tropical rainforests told me privately that they think the Amazon has already passed its tipping point. Let that sink in. The world needs to know
When I am at these scientific meetings, where basically every talk and poster is about precisely how Earth is rapidly breaking down, I just want to scream. I stood up and asked a question about this in front of everyone, though maybe too politely
I am on a night train from DC to Jesup, Georgia where I will have a much-needed 10-day silent vipassana meditation course. I try to make it to one of these once a year. I started in 2003.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 29, 2023
I'm on a train to DC to help blockade the White House Correspondents' Dinner tonight. Why? Because President Biden has been making the climate crisis worse by expanding fossil fuels, and the news media continues to fail us by downplaying climate urgency and giving leaders a pass
Biden and his team have been going directly against clear, consensus scientific guidance: no new fossil fuel projects! But Biden has been approving carbon bomb after carbon bomb and as a climate scientist I cannot stay silent about these disastrous and deadly decisions
It's time to switch into climate emergency mode and pivot rapidly away from fossil fuels. But Biden steadfastly refuses to declare a climate emergency and instead continues accelerating fossil fuel expansion, locking us irrevocably into a much hotter future. It's crazy
Read 8 tweets
Mar 20, 2023
In December, Rose Abramoff and I jumped up on a stage at the AGU Earth science conference in Chicago, where we were presenting our work, with a banner that said "Out of the lab and into the streets." We did this out of love. Rose was fired, I am still under ethics investigation
However, the AGU recently concluded their own independent ethics investigation, with their ethics committee unanimously deciding to (1) restore our scientific abstracts into the conference program (which they had withdrawn); (2) take no further action.
I really want to stress that Rose and I acted 100% out of love and in a principled way. The action wasn't perfect - I doubt any action can be - and you don't have to agree with it, but that was the intention behind it. We are doing our best, trying to save as much as possible
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(