"Miracle" reunion after 62 years: At the age of 4, Jin Myung-sook (now 66) lost her way at market, got separated from family. She was reunited yesterday thanks to Korean police's genetic analysis system. Holding back her tears, she hugged her eldest brother, Jeong Hyung-gon (76).
In the summer of 1959, Myung-sook, who was 4 years old at the time, lost her way near Baedari Market in Incheon while following her younger brother on way to meet their father. She didn't know her address or last name, just that she was called "Myung-sook."
In the end, her name was changed to "Jin Myung-sook" after the priest's family name at a nursery, and she was eventually adopted by a nun in South Chungcheong Province. After the age of 40, she decided to try find her family despite having no memory of them and different surname.
She went on TV to try find her family but nothing came up. She registered her genes in 2019 on a police genetic database. The police's Missing Family Support Centre analysed her genes and found a man Jeong Hyung-sik (68) to be a close match through interview and genetic analysis.
Hyung-sik moved to Canada, but before going, registered his genes on the system in the hope of finding his long lost sister Myung-sook. A match came up recently, and through further tests and confirmations, the family relation was confirmed.
She met eldest brother Hyung-gon yesterday in Seoul, and connected with brother Hyung-sik via video call. He says he felt guilty "losing" her at market, prayed everyday to find her.
Myung-sook thanked police, says she'll live happily with her family for the rest of her life.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ S. Korea is treating Trump's 25% tariff announcement as a national emergency, with Acting President Han Duck-soo mobilising an all-government response.
2/ With Trump declaring April 2 as "Liberation Day" for American industry, South Korean officials are scrambling to develop strategies to protect the country's $128 billion in exports to the US, which generated a $55.7 billion trade surplus last year.
3/ Finance Minister Choi Sang-mok promised swift action: "If market volatility expands excessively, all available market stabilisation measures will be immediately implemented according to the situation-specific response plan". yna.co.kr/view/AKR202504…
1/ A few weeks after President Yoon declared martial law in December, I was able to read a military document detailing how martial law would have worked... has it been successful.
The content was so disturbing that I still have nightmares about it.
2/ This wasn't just a "warning" to the opposition as Yoon claims. The manual reveals extensive control measures had martial law been successful, including an extensive permit system for going out at night and driving.
3/ Public gatherings would have been regulated, and there would have been comprehensive surveillance. even weddings and funerals. Every aspect of civilian life would have been controlled had the martial law continued beyond those 6 hours.
2/ The court rejected Han's impeachment because his violations couldn't be "definitively determined to constitute betrayal of public trust" (국민의 신임을 배반한 경우에 해당한다고 단정할 수 없어).
This standard will no doubt apply to Yoon's case as well.
3/ Notably, the court completely avoided ruling on whether the martial law declaration itself was unconstitutional or constituted insurrection. It focused narrowly on Han's role, reserving these crucial determinations for Yoon's case.
BREAKING: South Korea's Constitutional Court has rejected the impeachment of Prime Minister Han Duck-soo, allowing him to immediately resume his duties and role as acting president during President Yoon's suspension.
In a split decision announced just now, 5 justices voted to reject the impeachment, 1 supported upholding it, and 2 argued the case should be dismissed.
1/ We find ourselves again not knowing when Yoon's impeachment verdict will be announced. So much speculation. Only the 8 justices know what's going on. Meanwhile, this endless guessing game continues as Korean media try to decipher every signal from the Constitutional Court:
2/ What we DO know: The court announced it will deliver Prime Minister Han Duck-soo's impeachment verdict on Monday 24 March. This is also the same day as President Yoon's criminal trial hearing at Seoul Central District Court for the insurrection charges.
3/ Also: Democratic Party leader Lee Jae-myung's election law violation appeal verdict is scheduled for Wednesday 26 March. Some believe the Constitutional Court wants to see this outcome before finalising Yoon's case, as it affects political landscape. imnews.imbc.com/replay/2025/nw…
1/ I just watched the German public broadcaster ARD's documentary about South Korea's martial law crisis. It’s both appalling and shocking. This isn't merely biased journalism, it's borderline unethical, functioning essentially as a mouthpiece for far-right conspiracy theorists.
2/ The documentary presents extreme views without any pushback whatsoever. It legitimises unfounded claims about Chinese/North Korean infiltration, election fraud, and a supposed "communist threat" from the opposition. All without critical examination. ardmediathek.de/video/phoenix-…
3/ Of the six main voices featured, five represent conservative or far-right viewpoints. Only one offers any counterbalance. The most extreme voices, including the notorious far-right pastor Jeon Kwang-hoon, are presented as legitimate commentators rather than fringe figures.