Thread with excerpts from “Taming the Wild Fields: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe” by Willard Sunderland
Ecologies of northern Eurasia. The steppe is a flat & grassy region that was ruled by pastoral nomads from Bronze Age through early modern period.
Medieval Slavic farmers had a bloody relationship with their pastoral nomadic Cuman & Kipchak neighbors on the steppe. Despite mutual hatreds (biblically infused on Russian side) from raids, trade & military alliances kept Slavic & Cuman societies in mutual dependency.
Slavs built long earthen & palisade walls on their southern frontier as early as late 10th century AD to shield their realm from the steppe tribes.
Russia had few people living in the garrison towns of the Volga in late 16th century, so allowed for runaways to settle the region as Cossacks. Cossacks were very heterogeneous - included Poles, Tatars, & Ukrainians in addition to Russians.
Muscovy’s defense line against steppe nomads was hundreds of miles long & built at immense cost. It was made of felled trees, ditches, blockposts, & fortified towns. Built gradually from 15th-17th centuries, the defense lines were successful & dramatically reduced steppe raids.
Mid-17th century Kalmyks viewed their relationship with Russia as an alliance of equals, & used Russia in both internal conflicts as well as in their rivalries with their steppe rivals.
500,000 settlers moved to the steppe in Catherine the Great’s reign. 56% went to southern & eastern Ukraine, 18% to the lower Volga, 16% to North Caucasus, 10% to southern Urals.
Russian settlement of steppe was heavily male, so government deported women criminals to steppe & assigned them to men as wives. Some steppe settlers like the Greben Cossacks raided both their Caucasian neighbors & Russia proper for wives with government approval.
Most 19th century colonists of the steppe were Orthodox Slavs. This was mostly because moving state peasants from overpopulated areas of core Russia was cheaper than moving the Uralic & Turkic peoples of the Volga.
There was little immigration to Russia in mid-19th century. Existing foreign colonies had a great deal of autonomy until the 1870s. Russian bureaucrats liked German Mennonite settlers the most, Armenians the second most, & Balkans people least.
By mid-19th century, settled people were 5x more efficient even in raising animals than the pastoral nomads were. Settled Christian converts from the steppe tribes as well as Slavic land squatters were increasingly favored by Russian government in land disputes as result.
Late 19th southern Russia developed rapidly - telegraphs, railroads, stock exchanges, banks, opera houses, steam-powered mills, & hotels were built by the thousands. Kalmyks were freed from their obligations to their nobles in 1892. The Bashkirs too were finally settling down.
Russian conscripts from the steppe averaged 1-3 cm taller than their countrymen from the mid-Volga in 1889.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread with excerpts from "The Other Quiet Revolution: National Identities in English Canada, 1945-71" by Jose Igartua
Author argues national identity among English-speaking Canadians died entirely in mid-20th century, and was replaced by a broader civic identity. Nonetheless there is still an English-Canadian nation that can be seen sociologically through shared culture.
90% of Canadians read at least one newspaper in 1969, compared to only 68% watching television news. Spread of opinion polling ended up restricting range of public discussion.
Thread with excerpts from "Lies of the Tutsi in Eastern Congo/Zaire. A Case Study: South Kivu (Pre-Colonial to 2018)" by John Kapapi
At the time of the 1884 Berlin Conference, what is now the eastern Congo was ruled by eight kingdoms. Rwanda had yet to be united. Per the author, Rwandan (Tutsi & Hutu) migration west of Lake Kivu was minimal at the time.
Belgians created two chiefdoms in North Kivu. One was given to Tutsi from Hunde in 1922, & other was bought from the Hunde in 1939. Conflict with Hunde led to Tutsi preferring to flee to South Kivu during the dynastic struggles following overthrow of King Rwabugiri in 1895.
In line with archaeology, western & central Iberia were populated by hunter-gatherers distinctive from those on Mediterranean coast by their higher Magdalenian ancestry. Those hunter-gatherers had a resurgence over the EEFs as elsewhere during neolithic.
Steppe ancestry in IEs was diluted by the time that they reached SW Iberia at end of third millennium, in line with other studies. However, there are signs of an Eastern Mediterranean migration to Iberia in Bronze Age or earlier:
There was substantial migration to urban areas in Portugal during the Roman period from Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa. If these samples are representative, about half of the urban population was foreign-derived. Date of the site isn't provided, but was after 100 BC.
Caesar's destructiveness around the Rhine can be seen in the palynological record around Cologne. The area was densely cultivated starting about 250 BC and reforested after 50 BC, implying depopulation for a century.
pre-modern mass migrations often had appalling death tolls. Pressure of the German Suebi on the Celt Helvetii must have been tremendous:
Tiberius withdrew Roman troops from east of the Rhine, but left a 10 km no man's land that wasn't resettled by Germans until the late first or early second centuries.