Thread with excerpts from “Taming the Wild Fields: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe” by Willard Sunderland
Ecologies of northern Eurasia. The steppe is a flat & grassy region that was ruled by pastoral nomads from Bronze Age through early modern period.
Medieval Slavic farmers had a bloody relationship with their pastoral nomadic Cuman & Kipchak neighbors on the steppe. Despite mutual hatreds (biblically infused on Russian side) from raids, trade & military alliances kept Slavic & Cuman societies in mutual dependency.
Slavs built long earthen & palisade walls on their southern frontier as early as late 10th century AD to shield their realm from the steppe tribes.
Russia had few people living in the garrison towns of the Volga in late 16th century, so allowed for runaways to settle the region as Cossacks. Cossacks were very heterogeneous - included Poles, Tatars, & Ukrainians in addition to Russians.
Muscovy’s defense line against steppe nomads was hundreds of miles long & built at immense cost. It was made of felled trees, ditches, blockposts, & fortified towns. Built gradually from 15th-17th centuries, the defense lines were successful & dramatically reduced steppe raids.
Mid-17th century Kalmyks viewed their relationship with Russia as an alliance of equals, & used Russia in both internal conflicts as well as in their rivalries with their steppe rivals.
500,000 settlers moved to the steppe in Catherine the Great’s reign. 56% went to southern & eastern Ukraine, 18% to the lower Volga, 16% to North Caucasus, 10% to southern Urals.
Russian settlement of steppe was heavily male, so government deported women criminals to steppe & assigned them to men as wives. Some steppe settlers like the Greben Cossacks raided both their Caucasian neighbors & Russia proper for wives with government approval.
Most 19th century colonists of the steppe were Orthodox Slavs. This was mostly because moving state peasants from overpopulated areas of core Russia was cheaper than moving the Uralic & Turkic peoples of the Volga.
There was little immigration to Russia in mid-19th century. Existing foreign colonies had a great deal of autonomy until the 1870s. Russian bureaucrats liked German Mennonite settlers the most, Armenians the second most, & Balkans people least.
By mid-19th century, settled people were 5x more efficient even in raising animals than the pastoral nomads were. Settled Christian converts from the steppe tribes as well as Slavic land squatters were increasingly favored by Russian government in land disputes as result.
Late 19th southern Russia developed rapidly - telegraphs, railroads, stock exchanges, banks, opera houses, steam-powered mills, & hotels were built by the thousands. Kalmyks were freed from their obligations to their nobles in 1892. The Bashkirs too were finally settling down.
Russian conscripts from the steppe averaged 1-3 cm taller than their countrymen from the mid-Volga in 1889.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In line with archaeology, western & central Iberia were populated by hunter-gatherers distinctive from those on Mediterranean coast by their higher Magdalenian ancestry. Those hunter-gatherers had a resurgence over the EEFs as elsewhere during neolithic.
Steppe ancestry in IEs was diluted by the time that they reached SW Iberia at end of third millennium, in line with other studies. However, there are signs of an Eastern Mediterranean migration to Iberia in Bronze Age or earlier:
There was substantial migration to urban areas in Portugal during the Roman period from Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa. If these samples are representative, about half of the urban population was foreign-derived. Date of the site isn't provided, but was after 100 BC.
Safavids were, like Ottomans, born in obscurity in chaos of mid-13th century Mongol invasions - although as Sufi order rather than as tribal migration. Contrary to later propaganda, Sheikh Safi was not a sayyid or from a Shia background, but he became prominent in a Shia milieu.
Safavid Order had a waqf (charitable endowment) for its benefit by 1305 in Ardabil. Its network of followers expanded in Anatolia, Khorasan, & Mazandaran under aegis of Ilkhanate & some of its successors, but was forced to arm some of its supporters in at least Ardabil.
Timur, the greatest mystic of his era, liked the Safavid Order & granted it additional lands to financially sustain its missionary efforts. However, the Order was squeezed by his sons, who desires to centralize power in the realm.
Thread with excerpts from "Hezbollah: A Short History" by Augustus Richard Norton
Shia birthrates in mid-20th century Lebanon were higher than those of Sunnis & Christians.
from 1950s to 1970s Lebanese Shia typically supported secular parties led by Christians - whether rightist or leftist. Growth of armed Palestinian formations in Lebanon in 1970s drove formation of both coalitional & oppositional Shia organizations.
Thread with excerpts from "Revolutionary Iran: A History of the Islamic Republic" by Michael Axworthy
one reason to find the Iranian Revolution interesting is that it proceeded to follow a non-Western path of development, much like India & China, rather than following the Western path.
Iranian Shia Islam is a more organized & disciplined force than Sunni Islam in most of the rest of the world as the result of an enduring clerical hierarchy (the Sunni Caliphate was dissolved in 1924).