Here are 29 pages promulgated by the state of Oregon laying out standards for "social sciences integrated with ethnic studies." Whether you like it or not, states already have granular requirements for education. oregon.gov/ode/educator-r…
Here's one of the standards for kindergarten:
For first grade:
For second grade:
Here are some high school standards:
More high school:
And one more high school:
The point here is not whether or not they are good standards. It's that they are granular, non-neutral standards. They enshrine a certain intellectual approach.
So to say that it's "un-American" for some people to want to have different standards misses how US public education currently works (policymakers are already imposing standards, some with significant ideological weight).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I see this fact tossed around a lot--that much of Western Europe does not put fluoride in its public drinking water.
That's true but incomplete. In many European countries, fluoride is added to salt, so Europeans are still ingesting fluoride supplements, just in a different way.
In Germany, about 70% of the salt is fluoride-supplemented. It's even higher in Switzerland. tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.108…
Thus, you can't compare cavity rates in Europe and the USA in order to "prove" that fluoridated water doesn't have a payoff for dental health (unless you also support putting fluoride in salt, too).
For @CityJournal, I dig into some of the challenges facing the Biden campaign.
Perhaps chief among them is the fact that Biden ran as the candidate for restoring "normalcy," but many Americans have seen a broader political unraveling during his presidency.
A 🧵.....
The intersection of the five I's has helped destabilize Biden's presidency: international instability, immigration, inflation, and identity.
On a level of raw polling, Biden has never recovered from the Afghanistan withdrawal, which shattered public confidence in his administration.
There's a red flag in this opinion, when the narrow majority says it will not even try to offer a "single, all-encompassing definition" of an "insurrection."
A lack of definitional clarity means a lack of limiting principle for the radical proposal of kicking candidates off the ballot.
Big question proponents of 14A strategy have to reckon with: How does that simply not become a vehicle for partisan retribution and the breakdown of the electoral process?
There's a reason why even some of Trump's fiercest critics have objected to the 14A strategy. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
One of the things used to hype Trump's supposed absolute domination of the GOP is that he hasn't "just gone away" after leaving office. But most presidents of past 30 years have continued to try to influence US politics (often w/family members) in a major way.
Bush 41: Two years after he lost reelection, his sons ran for governor in 2 of the biggest US states. GWB would later become US president.
Clinton: Wife became US senator once he left office and would later run for president in 2008 and 2016 (being D nominee in 2016).
Bush 43: Left office with Hoover levels of support and is really the only president in recent decades who comprehensively withdrew from public view after leaving office.
Obama: Helped select D nominees in both 2016 and 2020 and regularly involved in public debates.