Thread. Have you ever heard of "civil asset forfeiture"? You're never going to think about the police the same way again. (1)
A few years ago, when I was at the public defender's office, my very poor clients kept telling me the same story: they would be walking down the street and DC police would stop them, search them at gunpoint, tell them to open their wallets, and take all the cash they had. (2)
The wildest part? The DC police would then send them a letter saying that, if they wanted to challenge the police taking of their cash, they would need to pay either $250 or 10% of the amount taken, whichever was more! (3)
So, if police took $10 or $20 from someone, the person would need to pay $250 to even have the right to challenge the cops in court. If you couldn't pay, the cops kept your money. (4)
If you challenged them in court, you'd have to prove that your property was *not* somehow connected to a crime. Think about how hard that is. (5)
If you still wanted to challenge the DC police, they'd send a lawyer to litigate an entire civil asset forfeiture case against you, and you aren't entitled to a lawyer if you're poor because the cops call it a civil case not a criminal case. You have to fight them alone. (6)
Sure enough, when I examined the DC records, the cops had taken cash from thousands of people, almost entirely Black people. They'd also taken hundreds of cars from people, mostly older women of color. I couldn't find a single example of a person successfully challenging it. (7)
A lot of the time, cops were taking $5 and $30 from extremely poor people who were struggling to meet the basic necessities of life for their children, like buying food and diapers and shoes. (7)
In most places, there is no need for the cops to arrest you with civil forfeiture. There's no need for a conviction. They can just allege that your property is connected to a crime and take it. Then they can keep most of it for fancy weapons and corrupt travel junkets. (8)
To understand the scope of this problem, you should know that cops take more money from people in civil asset forfeiture than all burglaries combined in the U.S. (9) washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2…
The cops at the local, state, and federal levels across the country have taken almost $70 billion in civil forfeiture in the past 20 years! (10) ij.org/press-release/…
When cops ask you for more funding, remember that only 4% of all cop time is spent on what they call "violent crime." Next time they ask for money, remember the kafkaesque abuses at every U.S. police department and ask if cops actually care about safety for everyone. (end)
During one of my investigations early in my career, I met a Black teenager who was ticketed for sagging his pants (which was made illegal where he lived). He couldn't afford the ticket, so a judge and a prosecutor approved his arrest, and he was put in a cage.
Several hundred thousand people are jailed every year in the United States because they can't pay various court debts. This is actually a significant fraction of what municipal courts do, and a huge part of the job of police and prosecutors.
The people who talk about police violence, but frame the problem as one of "bad apples" don't want people thinking about the everyday violence all around us--the violence that has become so normal that many people live their lives without even noticing that it is there.
THREAD. One of the most nefarious forms of copaganda is the "authoritarianism is actually what marginalized people want" trope. Here we are told Black people want the military to come into their community rather than, say, free medical care, housing, and guaranteed income.
Liberal elite opinion punditry is awash in this nonsense. It's similar to French propaganda in colonial Algeria and South African elite commentary during apartheid. And all share something in common: it works best when members who identify with the group make the argument.
The overall goal of commentary like this is to constantly *manage* the results of unjustifiable inequality with state repression rather than to make our society more equal.
THREAD. Across the U.S., hundreds of thousands of children have been banned from visiting their parents who are awaiting trial in local jails. Why? A conspiracy to make money. We just filed two landmark civil rights lawsuits to stop it, but the story is unbelievable.
The lawsuits allege that Sheriffs banned family visits as part of a conspiracy with kickbacks from the multi-billion dollar jail telecom industry on the theory that they could all make money on expensive phone and video calls if families couldn’t visit their loved ones for free.
Children have a right to hug their parents, hold their hand, and look into their eyes. It's one of the basic liberties that the government cannot take away. And yet, most people in U.S. don't know that their local sheriff and a few private equity-owned companies are doing this.
THREAD. Today, the New Yorker magazine has published one of the worst pieces of copaganda about retail theft that I have seen in my archive. I'm not going to link to it, but I want to share a few thoughts.
First, as I have written, the fixation on retail theft by corporate media, police, and Big Retail is scandalous. We now know that they lied about it at a time when property crime is near historic lows. There is no evidence that retail theft is increasing.
Even New York Times (and Atlantic, NPR, LA Times, and many others) debunked this nonsense. It was a cash grab by cops and retailers to socialize corporate security, increase police budgets, deflect from labor practices, and promote anti-online legislation. nytimes.com/2023/12/08/bus…
THREAD. The most effective propaganda is based on true facts. It is simply inaccurate that the best propaganda are lies. This is a phenomenon that is widely misunderstood. A few quick points.
The best propaganda takes true facts and uses them to create a false impression. For example, the news media can create the impression that shoplifting is rising in a given city in year X by reporting more true anecdotes of shoplifting than it did in year X-1.
The public can be influenced to conclude that shoplifting is rising based on seeing only true stories of shoplifting, even though the actual number of shopliftings had gone down significantly.
THREAD. One of the most dangerous forms of modern copaganda is claiming “even liberals are doing it” when talking about something monstrous and authoritarian.
First, there is nothing “liberal” about the current SF ruling class. It has among the most authoritarian local government officials I have tracked in my 15 years. The DA and Mayor and former police PR head on the County Board are backed by Republican billionaires.
Second, the politics of the city have changed a great deal. It is dominated by real estate and tech money pushing alarming policies designed to make the city a haven for the global rich by cleansing it from people the deem undesirable.