If healthcare is the most broken market in our economy, then hospitals are probably the most broken sub-market.
We've seen massive consolidation in the hospital sector (just look at this map).
Prices have gone way up, and post-merger we don't see evidence of quality increases.
The EO does three things to attack this problem:
1. Directs DOJ and FTC to update their merger guidelines to protect hospital patients
2. Directs HHS to support hospital price transparency rules
3. Encourages Congress to pass legislation on surprise hospital billing
All good!
Speaking of price transparency, that's one laudable thread that runs throughout the EO.
New rules on price/fee transparency across a wide variety of sectors (health insurance, internet services, airlines, etc.) will make it easier for consumers to comparison shop & save money.
Lastly, let's talk about banking.
Seems obvious that consumers should be able to download their banking data and take it with them.
Would make it easier for fintech to compete with legacy banks.
Dodd-Frank already allows this, but CFPB needs to issue rules to cement this right
Even though this pushes agencies in the right direction on competition, executive orders are constitutionally limited in what they can achieve & can be undone.
Congress should follow up with legislation on many of these items (especially non-competes & occupational licensing).
Here's a piece I wrote last year calling for more scrutiny of competition issues in healthcare and agricultural.
A new collection of 16 essays on how to accelerate AI for science & security: ifp.org/launch
The AI revolution is already delivering enormous consumer benefits. But AI progress won't automatically solve humanity's most important problems first. To get the future we want, we need to shape the trajectory of AI progress.
This series is a step toward that future…
1. @fiiiiiist, @taoburr, and @timhwang have an intro essay on how to actually shape AI progress: ifp.org/preparing-for-…
2. @AdamMarblestone & @Andrew_C_Payne on how to map the mammalian brain’s connectome to solve fundamental problems in neuroscience, psychology, and AI robustness: ifp.org/mapping-the-br…
Our organizations don’t agree on everything (e.g., tariffs), but we do agree there are immediate steps we can take to boost industrialization & innovation.
We shouldn’t imitate Beijing’s playbook — America succeeds by leveraging our own advantages.
US innovation does not rely on top-down economic mandates, forced tech transfers, or intellectual property theft.
What we do need is the same level of seriousness that China brings to its techno-industrial agenda.
A serious country wouldn't allow red tape to delay critical investments worth hundreds of billions.
A serious country wouldn’t educate the world's brightest minds only to send them away.
A serious country wouldn't cut core investments in science — but would instead target them toward high-risk, high-reward opportunities.
We can make different choices.
We can revitalize our industrial base, scale up our scientific capabilities, and build a military to deter emerging threats.
Here are the 27 proposals to make it happen… 🧵
We have 8 proposals on frontier science & technology:
1. @calebwatney on launching x-labs for science
2. @timhwang and @JoshuaTLevine on foreign data flows for AI
3. @sophiabrownh and @r_zwetsloot on reforming federal hiring
4. @LarsESchonander on reforming the SBIR program
5. @fiiiiiist on special compute zones
6. Brady Helwig and @arrian_ebrahimi on the national semiconductor technology center