Interesting (read: appalling) tidbit from @MichaelCBender's new book, which I've just started to read: Former guy told people he launched the Soleimani airstrike because of his upcoming impeachment trial (no. 1): He wanted to placate GOP senators who urged the strike. (p. 41)
Cipollone and Barr and their staffs had a suicide pact under which, in essence, they'd all resign if Trump ever fired one of them for refusing to do something too insane, or unethical. (p. 49)
Book officially comes out this week, but I came across copies already on display at a bookstore. amazon.com/Frankly-Did-Wi…
Ok, here's one: Because [cough] fg thought Rudy was so good on TV, he wanted Rudy to be trial counsel in impeachment no. 1 (which would have been a huge conflict, because Rudy was a co-conspirator). They managed to talk fg out of this by bringing in ... Dersh. (p. 50)
(and Sekulow and Starr and others)
This is going to be the story of fg's post presidency: endless revelations of how everyone around him knew he was an incompetent nutjob and struggled to keep him from doing incompetent and nutty things while pretending publicly he wasn't incompetent and nutty.
Well, actually not everyone. Some people around him did urge him to do incompetent and nutty things, either because they were themselves incompetent and nutty, or because they were trying to curry his favor.
That'll be part of the story that goes into the history books too. A sick ecosystem of pathology, sycophancy, denial, and grift.
Oh, so classy. Page 109:
"'We gotta be hitting the mick,' Brad [Parscale] said about Biden, using a derogatory term to refer to the Democrat's Irish heritage."
P. 113
"[Ronna Romney McDaniels's] mom's side of the family was largely supportive of Trump, and the Romney side less so. ... Mitt Romney ... said he hadn't voted for Trump in 2016 and wouldn't again in 2020, either."
Former guy's reaction to the NYT's report that he spent part of a night in the WH bunker:
"'Whoever [leaked] that, they should be charged with treason! They should be executed!'"
(p. 157)
Oh, totally fine; nothing to see here. Reaction at the White House after protesters were attacked at Lafayette Park before the FG's photo op there:
"Inside the outer Oval, aides erupted in high-fives."
(p. 169)
fg takes Gen. Milley to task for apologizing for Lafayette Park: "That's weak."
GM: "Not where I come from.... It had to do with ... the uniform and the apolitical tradition of the US military."
fg: "I don't understand ...."
GM: "I don't expect you to understand."
(pp. 177-8)
So fg was mad at Jared for supposedly causing him not to respond more strongly to the Floyd protests: "I've done all this stuff for the Blacks—it's always Jared telling me to do this. And they all fucking hate me, and none of them are going to vote for me."
(pp. 206-07)
fg potentially exposing a whole bunch of people to covid all day on 10/1 after receiving a + rapid test.
(pp. 276-77)
Just skimming through this and obviously barely scratching the surface. There's no index! At some point I'm going to have to sit down and actually read this before another one of these books comes out
which probably will be tomorrow
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yep. Even if Cohen had advanced the money in October 2016 on his own without any expectation of repayment by Trump—a ludicrous lie—Cohen would have committed a campaign finance violation (which is why he pleaded guilty to one).
Hicks’s testimony establishes beyond any question that Trump knew about that illegal and undisclosed contribution, and knew that his reimbursement of Cohen was not a payment for legal services.
And that means, beyond any reasonable doubt, that means that Donald Trump intentionally created false business records—including the checks that he himself signed—to cover up the underlying campaign finance violations.
“Former President Donald J. Trump’s new shared fund-raising agreement with the Republican National Committee directs a portion of donations to the political account he has used to pay his legal bills before any money goes to the party itself.”
“The order in which entities will receive funds from big donors through what is known as the Trump 47 Committee was disclosed in the fine print of an invitation to a big dinner next month in Palm Beach, Fla., where top donors are asked to contribute up to $814,600 per person to attend.” nytimes.com/2024/03/21/us/…
“The invitation shows that the first $6,600 donated will go to Mr. Trump’s campaign. The next $5,000 will go to his Save America PAC, which paid more than $50 million in legal and investigation-related bills for Mr. Trump in 2023. The $5,000 amount is the maximum that federal rules say can be contributed to Save America by an individual.” nytimes.com/2024/03/21/us/…
“There is ‘overwhelming’ evidence that Donald Trump is suffering from dementia, a leading psychiatrist has claimed, amid speculation about the state of the former president's mental health.”
“Dr. Lance Dodes, a supervising analyst emeritus of the Boston Psychoanalytic Society and Institute and retired Harvard Medical School professor, was among those recently quoted by Duty To Warn, which describes itself as an association of mental health professionals concerned about Trump.”
“‘Unlike normal aging, which is characterized by forgetting names or words, Trump repeatedly shows something very different: confusion about reality,’ he wrote in a statement published on Friday, which referenced Trump's confusing Barack Obama with Joe Biden.”
“Donald Trump’s … over-the-top rhetoric is not new and, for more than 400 licensed medical professionals, it’s not the most troubling aspect of Trump’s public performances.
“They see evidence that the former president, at 77, is suffering from ‘probable dementia’ so they have signed their names … to an online statement asserting that grave concern.”
“In a long series of testimonials, doctors and other professionals cite Trump’s use of incorrect words or jumbled words, suggesting a condition known as paraphasia, a common indicator of dementia.”
“So how do [Dr. John] Gartner and the dozens of professionals he consulted discern signs of dementia?
“‘When you are literally unable to form words and what you’re saying is so incomprehensible that it’s impossible for someone to understand what you are saying, that’s not rambling,’ says Gartner. ‘Those are serious signs of dementia. If you saw them in a relative, you would run, not walk, to a specialist to get them tested and start thinking about long-term care.’”