Gordon Berry Profile picture
Jul 11, 2021 3 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The #loancharge was designed to be penal in order to force people into voluntary settlement. But HMRC got carried away with their settlement terms adding IHT & penal interest. They could only do so because the #loancharge was so penal. So challenge this “fair share” claim by HMRC Image
This was the purpose of the #loancharge. It was meant to make the option of ‘voluntary’ settlement seem so much more attractive in comparison. Nobody was actually meant to suffer the #loancharge. But then the IHT department of HMRC decided that they too wanted their bit of flesh. Image
The #loancharge was never meant to be “fair” & neither now are the settlement terms. The irony of asking for IHT is that it’s due precisely because HMRC argue that it’s a write-off of a legitimate loan to the trust. (The attached was written by HMRC) Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gordon Berry

Gordon Berry Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wealthagent

Jul 12, 2021
@HilajoPaul That’s something of which @LordsEconCom could make great play. So this is a LOAN charge? It’s applied to LOANS? But you’re charging income tax? Is that normal? No? So you’re arguing it’s not really a loan? So explain the IHT charge to us then? So it’s because of a loan write-off?
@HilajoPaul @LordsEconCom Let’s start again so Rangers deems income tax is due & this is accepted in Hoey, but the tax isn’t collectible from the individuals you pursue? So you created a charge on the loans that you say aren’t really loans but Rangers is basis for that? You’re still pursuing those people?
@HilajoPaul @LordsEconCom Ah, you’re only pursuing the people who did fully declare their loans/non-loans to you throughout. But you previously assessed them on their loans & the Courts said NO. So you pursued the wrong people on the wrong basis? But you want them to pay anyway?
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(