2/ The campaign’s fighting to get the Government to guarantee care for all under 18-year olds in state care in England. Under Government proposals to regulate currently unregulated accommodation, 16- and 17-year-olds will have no right to receive care.
3/ This is despite the state’s responsibilities to promote the welfare of children in care. The Government’s proposals will create a legal nonsense that some 16- and 17-year-olds in state ‘care’ will not be entitled to receive day-to-day care.
4/ The Review of Children’s Social Care has said it supports the Government’s proposals…..while also bemoaning the fact that the ‘state is not a pushy parent’ and that there are ‘poor outcomes’ for care leavers. This position lacks consistency and integrity.
5/ The core reason behind the Government’s proposal is cost, in the context of a broken market of placement provision for children in care. 16- and 17-year-olds in care should not be paying the price of Government failures in allowing this broken market to develop.
6/ The Government needs to address the gaps in current placement provision for 16- and 17-year-olds in care, while ensuring their rights to care are protected and promoted.
7/ If we do not oppose this move to undermine the rights of young people in care, we are complicit in it. The Government can still do the right thing by ensuring all 16- and 17-year-olds have a right to care while they are still in care.
8/ Meanwhile, children's rights charity, @article_39 has applied to the High Court for a judicial review.
There are two core asks for supporters of this campaign:
Can you provide a source for claim 26% of social work graduates are not in social work jobs to start with? Are you including in this 26% those in residential child care, voluntary sector roles, community work roles, adult sector roles?
If so a problem is the narrow definition of what social work is. I'm proud graduates from trad courses go into the above roles - an entirely appopriate use of skills gained on a SW degree. SW includes statutory SW roles, it is not restricted to them, most of us always said so.
Secondly you are correct we still need to see retention rates for other course routes. But you avoid point that one of FL's founding premises was to help address retention crisis in C&F social work. It clearly is not doing so.
Thread on UK Gov claim it could not respect 21 day Parliamentary consultation period for The Adoption and Children (Coronavirus) (Amendment) Regulations 2020, which undermined safeguards for children in care. They claimed waiting would put services under 'extraordinary pressure'
Covid presents big challenges for services. But is there evidence children's homes are currently under the 'extraordinary pressure' claimed? Not according to an Independent Children’s Homes Association report that staffing levels are at 95% despite Covid cypnow.co.uk/news/article/c…
What about LA children's services? Last week President of the Association of Directors of Children's Services, Jenny Coles, said, in an interview with Community Care magazine, that, due to school closures, referrals to children's services in England were in fact DOWN 50%
The magazine arises out of a belief that there is much currently going on of high relevance to social work and social care in the UK under Covid-19, but there lacks an accessible format to bring some of those discussions together in a timely way
We want articles about issues that are of interest to those who use social work or social care services, those who provide them and those who undertake teaching or research around them under Covid-19, written by those people.