Byzantine Emporia Profile picture
Jul 15, 2021 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
How crop failures in the Soviet Union helped clean up the Great Lakes

In the early 1970s, Russia and the Ukraine had a series of bad harvests, putting the entire USSR at risk of famine. In 1972 the US government agreed to subsidize $300 million in sales of grain.
Soviet cargo ships sailed up the St. Lawrence waterway and into Lake Michigan, where they docked at Port of Indiana, a major transshipment point for Midwestern grain. This trade continued through the 70s and into the 80s.
At the time, the Great Lakes suffered from large algal blooms, owing to the nitrogen in agricultural runoff from the surrounding farmlands.
The Soviet ships, coming from the Black Sea, deposited Zebra mussels into the lakes from their ballast tanks. These small mussels are an invasive species that eat algae. Over time, they cleaned up the entire lake system.
The bottom of the lakes are covered in Zebra mussels to this day. This has had other side effects, but the lakes are a lot clearer than they used to be.
This thread came off a bit more blithe than I intended re zebra mussels—I was really just interested in the connection between distant events—but after reading the sputtering QTs…..no regrets!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Byzantine Emporia

Byzantine Emporia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @byzantinemporia

Aug 18, 2024
Ottoman borders in the 15th century looked a lot like Byzantium during its ascent: for similar geographic reasons they faced an ongoing state of war along their eastern frontier. But once they turned their full attention to the problem, they solved it much more dramatically.🧵
Image
Anatolia was the Ottomans’ base of power, where they welded together the Turkic beyliks that formed in the wake of Byzantine retreat. This was a gradual process, and by the 15th c. several retained varying degrees of independence.

Image
One of these was the Karamanids in southern Anatolia, who often tried to expand this during periods of Ottoman weakness or disunity. One of these attempts came in 1444, when the so-called Crusade of Varna was attacking their Balkan possessions. Image
Read 21 tweets
Jul 8, 2024
Quotes are from a superb pair of essays by @Scholars_Stage, Luttwak's book on Byzantium gives a similar misreading of their strategic culture (but cast in a positive light). In truth, the Byzantines were very eager to fight, diplomacy and bribes were only used as stop-gaps when occupied on another front, and the caution advised by their military manuals was tactical and operational—not strategic.
@Scholars_Stage On the first point, it was a matter of simple geography. They campaigned aggressively whenever threatened, but their two primary theaters were separated by an enormous distance.
The caution urged on frontier commanders by the manuals (e.g. On Skirmishing) has to be interpreted in light of the larger strategic picture. Prematurely forcing a battle risked leaving all of Anatolia exposed before the imperial army could mobilize.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 4, 2024
When the Seljuks arrived in the Middle East, they played a very similar role to the Franks in Dark Age Europe: protectors of an enfeebled religious authority and the enforcers of orthodoxy.🧵 Image
The Franks who expanded into Gaul in the 6th century were unique among the barbarian kingdoms of Western Europe. Their king Clovis converted to Nicene Christianity, aligning himself with the surviving elite of the post-Roman West. Image
This stood in contrast to the Visigoths of Spain, Burgundians of southeast Gaul, Ostrogoths of Italy, and Vandals of North Africa, all of whom practiced Arianism and remained aloof of their subject populations. Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 10, 2024
It took a decade for a 17th-century financial crisis to travel from Spain to China.

The Spanish Crown suffered a pair of fiscal disasters in 1627-28 which eventually forced it to cut silver exports to the Far East, hammering a Ming China already teetering on the precipice. Image
The flood of New World silver into Asian markets in the 1500s crushed the value of metal currency, but also supercharged trade as new markets were opened for exports. The effect was the same from Syria to China.
By the second half of the century, the Far East was receiving about a third of the Spanish Crown’s silver (already 80% of the world’s supply).

Adding to this, new mines in Japan began producing large quantities in the middle of the century. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 3, 2024
The Spartans drilled.

This is a ridiculous reading of the sources mentioned, and it neglects a few other important ones.

Thread.
To start with, one thing he gets right is that the classical Greeks deprecated the value of individual skill at arms—if anything, that would detract from their willingness to hold the line. Here’s a wonderful passage from the Spartan poet Tyrtaeus, who is mentioned: Image
Maintaining formation—παρ᾿ ἀλλήλοισι μένοντες—is seen as the chief martial virtue. So how did they learn to do it?

Let’s look at the quote from Laches. Nicias suggests that young men should prepare for war by training at arms.Image
Read 21 tweets
Oct 19, 2023
Easy to underestimate how thorough the breakdown of a centralized system can be. To put it in modern perspective, here's what it takes just to get the right 𝘸𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩 for the lasers in lithography machines used to etch the most advanced microchips (from "Chip War")...


Image
Image
Image
That's a staggering amount of material, intellectual, and economic infrastructure required just to sustain one part of a very complicated process. Sustaining that infrastructure depends in turn on maintaining the process. If any one of several highly-centralized nodes is disrupted for any length of time, it becomes disproportionately more expensive and difficult to get it back online.
Systems are resilient and can recover from freak catastrophes. But anything that is likely to majorly disrupt one node is bound to introduce many other complications. Just as a hypothetical: a war over Taiwan that takes out TSMC, which manufactures 90% of advanced chips...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(