Sam Cranny-Evans Profile picture
Jul 16, 2021 24 tweets 7 min read Read on X
A thread on shaped charges, building upon yesterday's theme of ATGMs, which you can find here: Shaped charges are essentially a type of hollow charge explosive, designed to magnify the explosive's effects on a target. Image
A hollow charge is an explosive with a hollow cavity facing the target - this section can be a cone, hemisphere, or a number of other shapes. The cavity causes gaseous products formed during detonation of the explosive to focus, concentrating the blast's energy.
This is known variously as the Munroe Effect (US/UK) and the Neuman Principle (Ger). Munroe showed that the cavity would increase penetration into steel by printing 'USN 1884' into a charge and detonating it against steel. Image
Whilst Munroe was not the first to discover this - there are technically examples dating back to the age of black powder - he is widely regarded as the first to understand its benefits. He worked at the USN's Naval Torpedo Station. So far so good.
Development of hollow charges mostly continued theoretically between then and the Second World War. By then, shaped charges had entered the scene, and Germany, the US, UK, and Japan invested heavily in them and conducted lots of research. Image
So, what is a shaped charge? A shaped charge is essentially a hollow charge, but the cavity is lined with some form of solid material, which can be metal, glass, or even wood. The lining of the cavity increases penetration.
Ok, but how? Well, as the explosive is detonated a circular wave of energy propagates (spreads) from the detonator at a very high speed, which can be up to 8 km/s. As the wave of energy reaches the material liner, the liner begins to accelerate rapidly and collapses. Image
The collapse of the cone-shaped liner leads to a portion of the liner (around 20%) flowing in the form of a jet. The jet accelerates at very high speeds, which can be up to 10 km/s at its tip, and forms a slug at the rear, which is around 1/10 the speed of the tip of the jet.
There are a number of variables in liner design, including geometry; trumpet/tulip/cone-shaped liners, liner thickness and charge ratio, charge confinement, liner material, and manufacturing quality. All of these aspects affect the formation of a jet, alongside many other things. Image
Variations in thickness and the strength of the liner can lead to unstable jets that deviate from centreline as they travel towards the target. This can dissipate the jet over a larger area, reducing penetration. Similar irregularities occur if the detonation is asymmetric. Image
The efficacy of the jet is also partly dependent upon the projectile achieving an optimal standoff from the target. Penetration is reduced if it detonates too close to the vehicle, and will reduce if it is too far away.
A caveat, to reduce RPG-7 pen from 300 mm (ish) to 40 mm requires 1m of standoff. So, introducing standoff to increase survivability against even a basic shaped charge isn't really practical - imagine what might be required for a Kornet or Spike? Image
Target defeat; the problem with shaped charges is that the jet is relatively small. Crude rules indicate a jet diameter of around 1/20th of the cone diameter - this means a penetrator diameter of around 10 mm in the case of the largest warheads.
The length to diameter ratio, combined with speed of the projectile is monstrous however. They technically penetrate armour using kinetic energy and push the armour material out of the way - they do not melt or burn through armour. But, you knew that right? Image
The important thing is what happens behind the armour. As always, this is dependent upon a number of factors, key among them appear to be the size of the warhead, and the type - as opposed to thickness - of the vehicle armour.
It may, for example, make contact with ammunition, fuel, or oil within the vehicle leading to an ammunition fire or ‘cookoff’. This can be catastrophic for some vehicles such as the Soviet T-72. Others such as Merkava/Challenger 2 have specialised ammo containers to mitigate this Image
And many have adopted electric gun control and very careful fuel storage designs to help reduce the risk of a cookoff. This helps improve survivability in the event of shaped charge penetration - again, see the thread linked in the first tweet for more on this.
As the jet penetrates the vehicle it is likely to create a shower of spall. Spalling can be small fragments of armour and equipment, travelling at very high speeds and typically in a cone shape from the point of penetration. The quantity and size of spall depend on warhead.
Some vehicles carry spall liners, a form of armour such as Kevlar that is designed to catch the spall and limit the width of the cone. The jet may also hit members of the crew, in which case it would likely kill them, or equipment in the vehicle leading to fragmentation effects. Image
Other effects introduced into the vehicle may include increased pressure as well as of thermal and gaseous events. leading to injuries such as ear damage, all the way to organ failure. The temperature can increase by 148ºC and blinding white light is emitted in some circumstances
It is important to note, and re-emphasise, that many of these effects may not be generated by small-calibre projectiles such as the grenade fired by the RPG-7and would be dependent upon the use of large calibre shaped charges carrying considerable explosive mass place. Image
The nature of the liner can also have an effect, the AT-4 shoulder fired anti-tank weapon for instance carried an aluminium alloy liner, which was claimed to be capable of lighting diesel in the middle of a Swedish winter.
Overall, a very interesting technology that can prove very effective against armour. However, as yesterday's thread shows, effective use is essential for good results, and the design and manufacture of the warhead is incredibly important for a successful target defeat.
Thanks for reading, retweeting, and following if that's your thing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sam Cranny-Evans

Sam Cranny-Evans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Sam_Cranny

Jan 8
Hello! Good morning. If your timeline is like mine, you might be seeing the Telegram post from the image below today.

Why? Well, in short, the poster claims to have seen intercepted Russian FPV footage that shows the drone using AI for terminal guidance. Image
He states that the operator flies the drone to the area and selects the target with AI assistance. It then flies into the target. This isn't the first use of AI in this application, there is good evidence that Lancet can do it too. The new Iz-53 variant is more autonomous. Image
The original poster (OP), later said he had watched two more videos.

The Russians have been talking about this for a while. The Gadfly reportedly carried this capability in August 23: #AI vk.com/wall-35660695_…
Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 19, 2023
Hello! How are you? I'm good, thanks for asking. It's nearly Christmas and if you're winding down like me, you might enjoy a little technical thread on the T-90M.

Images are from @RecoMonkey, those guys do good work! The source? My book (JAFV21), and some desk research. Image
T-90M is the most technically capable tank in Russian service. It started life in 1999 as a way to improve on the T-90. It had entered trials by 2017 (rapid) and in 2018 there was talk of orders and deliveries. Vedomosti reported 160 T-90Ms under contract in 2020.
10 rebuilds, 50 T-90A conversions, and the rest presumably new builds. First deliveries followed later that year to the Taman Guards Div, part of the 1st Guards Tank Army. This image shows that fateful day. Image
Read 22 tweets
Nov 3, 2023
Hello again, it’s Friday, how has your week been? Would you like to know more about the Trophy active protection system (APS)? Awesome, have a glance at the following. It's used by the IDF and others to protect armoured vehicles from anti-tank weapons like RPGs and ATGMs. Image
If you’re not keen on reading, the BLUF is that Trophy is a good system and well-proven, but it is not and never was perfect. Any losses we see are also half the picture and should not lead to knee jerk reactions or analysis on Trophy’s suitability.
Development:
The IDF started looking at Trophy in 1987, it was a team effort led by the Israeli MoD, its Directorate of Research and Development, Rafael, and Elta. They weren’t the first, the Soviets had developed the Drozd APS in the late 70s, and even sent some to Afghanistan. Image
Read 25 tweets
Nov 2, 2023
Hello! How are you? Hope you’re doing ok.
I’ve built a thread to look at Namer, a heavy armoured personnel carrier (APC) that is in service with the IDF. You might have heard of it recently as 11 IDF personnel were reportedly killed in one when an ATGM hit their vehicle. Image
I have some thoughts on this at the end. If you don’t want to read that far; these things can happen to even the best-protected vehicles, a lot depends on the munition that hit it, and what was inside the vehicle.
Development: Maj Gen Tal, who oversaw development of the Merkava, decided that a heavy APC was needed in the 1980s, he had observed during Israel’s wars that infantry needed more protection than tanks. Interesting, right? Image
Read 21 tweets
Dec 1, 2022
These are some images of Ukrainian BTR-4s from back in March. I came across them doing some research on wheeled mobility and thought I would use them to illustrate some elements of terramechanics.
In 2000 Ogorkiewicz wrote about the Vehicle Cone Limiting Index, a measure developed in the UK at the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) to determine the go/no-go strength of a soil for wheeled AFVs of certain weights.
The VCLI is used with the cone index of the soil type in question to indicate whether a vehicle can pass it. Different soils have different CIs, wet soils like clay are weaker than hard soils low in moisture and will allow heavier vehicles to pass.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 28, 2022
Lots of good stuff coming from the @RUSI_org Land Warfare Conference today a few things following:

Oleksandr Danylyuk: The west and Russia made some assessments that were poor.

Russia's military demonstrations throughout 21 were designed to get Ukraine to accept Russia's view
The Russians thought this had worked and the West believed Russia would succeed in a matter of days.

Despite Western aid, it was Ukrainian heavy weapons that created the initial Russian reverses.

Failure to decapitate Ukr's political and mil control meant its goals failed.
Even after sanctions, Russia is in a much better position than Ukraine. But Ukr's successes have created misconceptions about Ru's capabilities and delayed heavy weapon deliveries.

Ukr had 200 Smerch and Uragan on 24th Feb, inability to replenish ammo has degraded their power.
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(