Thread with excerpts from “The Archaeology of South Asia: From the Indus to Asoka” by Robin Coningham and Ruth Young
Cultures of prehistoric Indian subcontinent by time & place 6000 BC to 0 AD
Sources of Ganges, Brahmaputra, & Indus Rivers are in Himalayas & Tibetan Plateau.
India gets two monsoons - the southwest monsoon from June through September, & the northeast monsoon from October through December. 8000-6000 BC there was a change in monsoons that led to warmer & wetter India, sparking development of animal domestication & sedentary lifestyles.
Nilgiri Highlands in Tamil Nadu were wetter and warmer in last Ice Age. Region has gotten dryer since 8000 BC.
Indo-Gangetic Plain was a savannah with scattered forests. Farming developed in the Plain between 7000-6500 BC. Also possible abortive neolithic around 11,000 BC in Horton Plains of Central Sri Lanka.
Authors description of what makes a society a Neolithic society: farming, use of domesticated animals, sedentary lifestyles, pottery, & relatively advanced stone tools with no metal.
Earliest finds of cotton in world were found in Mehrgarh archaeological site
Use of red ochre in earliest Mehrgarh burials is interesting example of cultural convergence. Proto-Indo-Europeans in Ukraine, Iron Age Berbers in Libya, Toharian people from Kroraina, & Mayans in Yucatán all used red ochre for burials, & clearly were not in contact.
Loebanr III & Kalako-deray sites in Swat Valley (~1700 BC) had jade beads & harvesters, artifacts characteristic of the Yangshao culture of Yellow River basin in China.
Neolithic civilization in Ganges River basin in eastern India, Nepal, Burma, & Bengal that derived from previous mesolithic hunter-gatherers. The civilization isn’t well dated, only good radiocarbon date from a site from the civilization is 2000 BC. They had stone axes & rice.
Domestic sheep near Kothari River in Rajasthan in 5th millennium BC. 3rd millennium BC Gujarat & Rajasthan had farming & herding - disputed if it was due to settlers from Indus River Valley Civilization or local hunter-gatherers who adopted that lifestyle from the west.
Karnataka by 2300-2200 BC had domesticated several local plants for farming. Then numerous sites there were abandoned in that period, many cattle stockades were burned in enormous fires, & new pastoral practices appeared in Karnataka with new settlements.
Possible Neolithic farming society in Sri Lanka collapsed or reverted to hunting & gathering after climate change ruined agriculture after 5500 BC. Agriculture was reintroduced & metalworking was introduced after settlers from the subcontinent arrived after 900 BC.
Gradual rather than sudden development of urban societies in Indian Subcontinent 6000 - 2000 BC. Some pottery shards show graffiti from proto-writing which was very different from the Indus Valley Civilization script.
Baluchistan 4300-3500 BC had growing settlements made of mud bricks, & featured granaries & stores. Lapis lazuli, steatite, turquoise, carnelian, & seashells were all worked with pottery in specialized workshops. Glass was made at same time as Egypt & Mesopotamia.
Baluchistan 3500-3000 shows signs of earliest irrigation channels in subcontinent, though debated. 3000-2600 population seems to have grown & social complexity increased. Monumental platforms (pyramids?) were built, & trade as far as Afghanistan & western India was conducted.
Late 4th millennium BC Kandahar was linked by trade to Elam. Proto-Elamite writing on tablets has been found in Kandahar.
3200-2600 BC Kot Dijian tradition emerged as unified pottery type across Indus River Valley & into Haryana & Rajasthan. They built walls around their settlements that were 6 m thick & 5 m tall. They had carts, bull figurines, & large brick platforms. Bricks were uniform in size.
2800-2600 BC several Indus River Valley Civilization settlements were burned, & almost all were abandoned. Invaders from Baluchistan mixed with their predecessors & kept much of their material culture. After invasion, almost all settlements were built in virgin lands, not ruins.
Harappa had about 30,000 residents. Mohenjo-Daro had 30,000-40,000.
Indus River Valley Civilization’s “Era of Integration” 2600-1900 BC featured rise of large urban areas & cultural homogenization. IVC at the time was 20x size of Egypt & 10x size of Mesopotamia. Over 1000 known settlements from Era of Integration are known.
Indus Valley Civilization built even their small settlements with drains.
Nomadic pastoral groups roamed the marginal parts of the IVC, but were economically integrated, probably bringing raw materials to the permanent settlements, then leaving with manufactured goods.
Baluchistan coast under under influence of Indus Valley Civilization, but rest of Baluchistan remained culturally distinctive as the Kulli Culture 2500-2000 BC.
Sumerians called Bahrain “Dilmun”. It was a center of trade in 3rd millennium BC for Mesopotamia, Iran, Oman, & the Indus Valley. 150k tumuli tombs were built there. Sumerians viewed it as very wealthy.
Little evidence for sea trade in 4th millennium BC in Arabian Sea & Persian Gulf. 3rd millennium did have sea trade though. Indus Valley Civilization artifacts & writing found in Oman, Bahrain, Khuzestan & UAE. IVC weights for trade measurements indicate extensive contacts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In line with archaeology, western & central Iberia were populated by hunter-gatherers distinctive from those on Mediterranean coast by their higher Magdalenian ancestry. Those hunter-gatherers had a resurgence over the EEFs as elsewhere during neolithic.
Steppe ancestry in IEs was diluted by the time that they reached SW Iberia at end of third millennium, in line with other studies. However, there are signs of an Eastern Mediterranean migration to Iberia in Bronze Age or earlier:
There was substantial migration to urban areas in Portugal during the Roman period from Eastern Mediterranean and North Africa. If these samples are representative, about half of the urban population was foreign-derived. Date of the site isn't provided, but was after 100 BC.
Safavids were, like Ottomans, born in obscurity in chaos of mid-13th century Mongol invasions - although as Sufi order rather than as tribal migration. Contrary to later propaganda, Sheikh Safi was not a sayyid or from a Shia background, but he became prominent in a Shia milieu.
Safavid Order had a waqf (charitable endowment) for its benefit by 1305 in Ardabil. Its network of followers expanded in Anatolia, Khorasan, & Mazandaran under aegis of Ilkhanate & some of its successors, but was forced to arm some of its supporters in at least Ardabil.
Timur, the greatest mystic of his era, liked the Safavid Order & granted it additional lands to financially sustain its missionary efforts. However, the Order was squeezed by his sons, who desires to centralize power in the realm.
Thread with excerpts from "Hezbollah: A Short History" by Augustus Richard Norton
Shia birthrates in mid-20th century Lebanon were higher than those of Sunnis & Christians.
from 1950s to 1970s Lebanese Shia typically supported secular parties led by Christians - whether rightist or leftist. Growth of armed Palestinian formations in Lebanon in 1970s drove formation of both coalitional & oppositional Shia organizations.
Thread with excerpts from "Revolutionary Iran: A History of the Islamic Republic" by Michael Axworthy
one reason to find the Iranian Revolution interesting is that it proceeded to follow a non-Western path of development, much like India & China, rather than following the Western path.
Iranian Shia Islam is a more organized & disciplined force than Sunni Islam in most of the rest of the world as the result of an enduring clerical hierarchy (the Sunni Caliphate was dissolved in 1924).