Alan Feuer Profile picture
Jul 19, 2021 58 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Good morning. I'm starting Thread #27 on posts about new arrests at the Capitol riot and updates on continuing cases.
Previous threads can be found archived below.
Today's main event will likely be the sentencing of Paul Hodgkins, the first J6 defendant who's admitted to disrupting the certification of the Electoral College vote.
Hodgkins faces between 15-21 months in prison. He has asked for no jail. The govt wants 18 months. Image
Hodgkins' sentencing is significant b/c it marks the first time a judge will suggest how to penalize the act of interrupting the democratic process in the absence of violence or vandalism.
Until now, only people charged w/misdemeanors have been sentenced.
In pre-hearing filings, Hodgkins' lawyer depicted his case as a kind of cautionary tale, saying the months after J6 are like the post-Civil War period when Lincoln sought to heal the nation.
Prosecutors admitted he wasn't violent but insisted he was "a rioter, not a protester."
Hodgkins' hearing starts at 10 am.
Judge Randolph Moss is bringing the court to order in the sentencing of Paul Hodgkins.
Paul Leduc, Hodgkins' lawyer, says Hodgkins will make a statement to the court.
Prosecutor says some factors in Hodgkins' case are troubling:
*his goal was to subvert the democratic process
*his presence at the Capitol was intimidating even though he wasn't violent or destructive
Prosecutor adds that Hodgkins is also responsible for "emotional injuries" at the Capitol. Staff cowering in their offices were terrified, she says. "Some will bear emotional scars forever."
He's also on the hook for a portion of the damage to the Capitol, she notes.
"He was a part of that mob," she says, making it all the way down to the well of the Senate and standing with others who were cheering and ranting.
He came prepared for confrontation, she adds, with goggles, gloves, rope.
The prosecutor distinguishes Hodgkins from those who merely strolled through the Capitol on Jan. 6.
"What his conduct is not," she says, "it is not a 15 minute walk with a crowd through the Capitol building."
Hodgkins was among about 30 people who went so far as to breach the Senate floor, the prosecutor notes, which is why the government is seeking a "mid-level" sentence even though he wasn't violent or destructive.
The prosecutor--I believe it's Mona Sedky--says she wracked her brain for weeks to come up with a pithy catchphrase for what Hodgkins did. She ended up quoting the DC circuit saying, "At its care this was a grave danger to our democracy."
Sedky says the government is framing Hodgkins' act as domestic terrorism saying there's a need to deter what she called a possible "second act."
The government isn't, however, seeking a penalty enhancement for a terrorism crime.
We'll now hear from Paul Leduc, Hodgkins' lawyer.
Correction: *Patrick* Leduc.
Leduc wants Hodgkins to speak first...
Hodgkins starts by saying he's privileged and humbled to be in court. It's his first time doing something like this, he says.
Without a shadow of a doubt, he says, he's "remorseful" for his actions on Jan. 6. and his actions may have "made others feel emboldened."
He says storming the Senate was "a foolish decision" and won't blame any "politician, journalist or otherwise"
for what he did, adding that Biden IS the president.
Still, he says he was merely caught up in the emotion of the day and never planned on breaking into the building.
Hodgkins says he tried to get his fellow rioters to leave the Senate and apologized to cops on the way out.
"I'm sorry for the trouble," he says he told one officer.
Hodgkins says that if he'd have known things would have escalated as they did on J6--or if was going to face the penalty he did--he wouldn't have set foot in the Capitol.
"In short," he says, "I allowed myself to put my passions before my principles."
Hodgkins asks for no jail time, saying if he is locked up he'll lose his job. He'll also most likely lose his home which he rents, he says, and he'll need to find a new home for his two cats.
Hodgkins' lawyer, Patrick Leduc, a colonel in the Army reserves, is pushing back hard on the govt's framing of the Hodgkins case as domestic terrorism.
He's listing other acts of domestic terrorism: a bombing by the Weather Underground in the Capitol in 1971, etc...
Leduc is saying if Jan 6 can be framed as domestic terror so should the violent protests stemming from the murder of George Floyd.
Judge Moss cuts in to say he's not going to consider the actions of others in sentencing Hodgkins.
Judge Moss also says there's no way to construe J6 as a First Amendment protest when people roamed the hallways looking for Nancy Pelosi and "the sacred duties" of Congress were stopped as legislators fled in terror.
Leduc backs down saying he was "inartful" and agrees.
Shrewd move by lawyer Leduc:
He says that if Judge Moss gives a no jail-time sentence other J6 defendants will rush to resolve their cases...
Leduc dips his toe into a comparison, saying 227 people were arrested for disrupting Congress during Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing and mostly got fines.
He knows there's a difference between that and Jan 6 but asks how much worse Hodgkins' behavior was...
Leduc, winding up to his conclusion, is now slamming cancel culture for robbing us, as a people, for granting others the grace we want ourselves.
Leduc rests on Lincoln's Second Inaugural: "With malice toward none; with charity toward all."
Within seconds of Leduc's big finale, Judge Moss steps in and asks: Will a no-jail sentence really heal the country or will it encourage conditions where others will repeat a Jan 6-like attack?
Moss sees Leduc's Second Inaugural and raises him a Gettysburg Address, quoting Lincoln saying that we can't play down J6 so "that a government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Judge Moss is stepping down for 5 or 10 minutes. He'll issue sentence when he returns.
Judge Moss is re-taking the bench.
Judge Moss starts by stressing that he's focused on sentencing Paul Hodgkins, not everyone else who was at the Capitol.
"Although Mr. Hodgkins was only one member of an active mob," Judge Moss says, he participated in an event that endangered not only the Capitol but "democracy itself," causing legislators to flee.
"That," Judge Moss adds, "is an extraordinary event."
It's chilling for many reasons, Judge Moss adds.
"When a mob is prepared to attack the Capitol...democracy is in trouble," he says.
The attack on the Capitol, Judge Moss says, "makes us question whether our democracy is less secure than we did just seven months ago."
Moss agrees to a point that Hodgkins was less culpable than some others at the Capitol. He wasn't a leader of the attack and wasn't violent or destructive. And wasn't one of the first people to breach the building.
Moss says he's less convinced that Hodgkins merely "lost his bearings" for a day. He went to DC on a bus form Florida. He brought goggles and gloves as if he were "prepared for conflict."
Hodgkins had to have seen the mayhem on Jan. 6 and didn't "end up there by accident."
Moss notes Hodgkins had a Trump flag with him in the Capitol.

"He was staking a claim on the floor on the US Senate," Moss said, "not with an American but a flag of a single individual over a nation."
"People have to know that assaulting the US Capitol and impeding the US congress...will have severe consequences," Judge Moss says.
BREAKING: Paul Hodgkins, the first Capitol rioter who admitted trying to stop the certification of the vote, was sentenced to 8 months in prison.
Judge Randolph Moss cited a need for "severe consequences" for Jan. 6 but said Hodgkins pled early and was a first-time offender.
NEW: Caleb Berry, another Oath Keeper, will be pleading guilty today in connection with the 1/6 riot.
Berry is the fourth member of the right-wing militia to enter a plea. The three others have cooperated w/the government. We'll learn this afternoon if Berry is cooperating too ImageImage
Prosecutors say Berry stashed weapons w/the Oath Keepers' quick reaction force in a Virginia hotel and took part in the military style "stack" that breached the Capitol. ImageImage
NEW: Prosecutors have charged an off-duty DEA agent, Mark Sami Ibrahim, with being in restricted areas of the Capitol on Jan. 6 without authority. Image
Around 1 pm on Jan. 6, court papers say--about an hour before the riot started--Ibrahim posed for photos outside the Capitol wearing his sidearm and badge. ImageImage
Ibrahim posted some of his photos to a WhatsApp channel used by other law enforcement agents. At around 2:30 pm, one of them asked him if was carrying his duty weapon and badge.
"I need to know this mark," the other law enforcement agent wrote. Image
When DOJ's Inspector General's office interviewed Ibrahim in March, he said he'd gone to the Capitol to help a friend in the FBI document the event.

But the friend later told investigators that Ibrahim had "crafted this story in an effort to 'cover his ass.'” Image
JUST IN: New video released in the case of Jan. 6 rioter Robert Morss gives a flavor of the nearly medieval siege of the Lower West Terrace of the Capitol.
In another new Morss case video, rioters struggle with cops outside the Capitol.
Morss is seeking to be released on bond. A judge is likely to rule on release this afternoon.
More Jan. 6 video has been released.
This clip shows former Special Forces operator Jeffrey McKellop striking an MPD captain in the face with a flagpole then heaving the pole at him like a spear.
BREAKING: Federal prosecutors have flipped a fourth member of the Oath Keepers militia.

Caleb Berry is pleading guilty now to J6 charges in a cooperation agreement w/the government.

He joins other Oath Keepers--Jon Schaffer, Mark Grods & Graydon Young--in working w/prosecutors.
In a new Capitol riot case, prosecutors have accused Michael Brock, of Mississippi, of assaulting multiple police officers on Jan. 6 with what they describe as "four-foot-long rod." ImageImage
A little late in seeing this but Proud Boy leader Ethan Nordean is re-upping his request for bond.
He's arguing the govt was slow in getting information to his lawyers including a Capitol security video showing cops standing aside and letting him into the building. Image
Nordean's lawyers say that in order win his release they'll wire his house with cameras if need be. They also put this photo of an electronic detection dog in their memo. Apparently, he--or one like him--would be on the job too. Image
Caveat dater:
Capitol rioter Andrew Taake met someone on Bumble shortly after Jan. 6 and sent his match several photos, including one of himself after being pepper sprayed.
Long story short, charges followed. ImageImage
The charges against Taake are serious.
Prosecutors say he used a metal whip and pepper spray to attack law enforcement officers. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alan Feuer

Alan Feuer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alanfeuer

Mar 18
Interesting: Judge Cannon has told the defense and govt to file proposed jury instructions defining the terms of the Espionage Act disputed at last week's motions hearing and narrowing the Presidential Records Act claim by April 2.
That suggests...

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
at least in theory that she is intending to take Trump's classified documents case to trial.
It would seem (?) like a waste of time to ask the parties to define for the jury the disputed elements of the Espionage Act--i.e. the law's requirement that the govt prove Trump had "unauthorized possession" of docs related to "national defense"--if she wasn't picturing a trial.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 20
JUST IN: Alexander Smirnov told the feds during an interview after is arrest that "officials associated with Russian intelligence" were involved in passing a story about Hunter Biden. Image
Smirnov also reported to the feds having contacts w/some pretty shady Russians including one connected to what seems like an assassination crew and an intel guy. Image
This detention memo for Alexander Smirnov is pretty wild
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Read 7 tweets
Jul 18, 2023
Now: The first Trump documents hearing in front of Judge Cannon in Florida has ended w/o a decision on the trial schedule. Cannon seemed skeptical of the govt’s request to go to trial in December but also seemed disinclined to let the trial stray until after the 2024 election.
Cannon pressed Trump’s lawyer if they wanted to delay the trial after voting and they affirmed they did. They said if a trial date must be set it should be for mid-Nov 2024.
Cannon said she would file a written order promptly.
Beneath the scheduling issues was a fascinating philosophical discussion of the nature of Trump as defendant. It revolved around the question of should Trump be treated like any other defendant or did his role as candidate need to be taken into account .
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12, 2023
Now: DOJ responds, glancingly, to the uproar over the Jacob Chansley footage, clarifying that the images of him w/the police took place *after* he illegally entered the Senate gallery--the behavior that triggered his obstruction of Congress charge.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
By glancingly, I mean prosecutors responded to the complaints of another defendant, Dominic Pezzola of the Proud Boys, about the footage, and clarified their position on the new video.
"In sum," prosecutors wrote, "Chansley was not some passive, chaperoned observer of events for the roughly hour that he was unlawfully inside the Capitol."
Read 5 tweets
Mar 12, 2023
We've just received more information about the tantalizing FBI data snafu that temporarily paused the Proud Boys sedition trial late week for an evidentiary
A quick thread.
Background: The dispute concerns a log of internal FBI chats from one of the case agents, Nicole Miller. The log was given to the defense for impeachment of her testimony. Miller minimized or hid responses from other agents since, govt says, they were outside scope of cross-ex.
But the defense found the minimizations & opened them up. The newly opened messages had some tantalizing things from another agent who was writing to Miller. There were also some places where Miller's responses to that agent appeared to be missing.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 9, 2023
Update: Prosecutors have told the judge in the Proud Boys sedition case that the Jencks issue may have been a result of a "spill" of classified information.
No one seems to know exactly what that means at this point.
Jocelyn Ballentine, the prosecutor who oversees the J6 conspiracy cases, tells Judge Kelly that the spreadsheet of internal FBI comms at issue here contained classified messages from "one other agent who does clandestine work" but who did not take part in the Proud Boys case.
The Proud Boys trial data issue is threatening to spin off into true chaos.
Norm Pattis, lawyer for Joe Biggs, is calling for the appointment of a special master to examine the spreadsheet of internal FBI comms to check for any classified messages.
(Gonna say that's unlikely...)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(