Listening to sentencing hearing for Paul Hodgkins. He pleaded guilty to one count of obstruction of an official proceeding, a felony DOJ is tacking on to mostly misdemeanor cases (like Hodgkins) for roughly 200 defendants. He has no criminal history, DOJ wants 18 months in jail.
While we wait, I want to share the silly rhetoric in DOJ sentencing memo. "Hodgkins admitted that he corruptly obstructed and impeded an official proceeding, namely the certification of the Electoral College vote count. He did so by unlawfully entering the U.S. Capitol...
alongside hundreds of other rioters with whom he shared in a unified goal: to block Congress from completing the certification. Defendant’s obstructive conduct took place amidst a violent riot that engulfed the entire Capitol. The riot resulted in evacuations,
vote count...
delays, officer injuries, and over $1.4 million in property destruction. Ultimately, the rioters’ conduct literally stopped the official proceeding in its tracks. [LOL] This constituted an even greater interference and intrusion than the examples of serious disruptions listed."
How DOJ convicts someone for domestic terrorism w/o charging them accordingly. "A significant sentence is needed to afford adequate deterrence. The need to deter others is especially strong in cases involving domestic terrorism, which the breach of the Capitol certainly was."
"The need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities--the crimes that Hodgkins and others like him committed on January 6 are unprecedented. These crimes defy statutorily appropriate comparisons to other obstructive related conduct in other cases." UNEQUAL JUSTICE.
Judge Moss: Max sentencing for obstruction is 20 years. Government seeking 18 months. DOJ dropped 4 trespassing, disorderly conduct charges against this dangerous terrorist and has let him roam free since his arrest in February.
Moss: "There are people who participated in the attack on the Capitol" who committed worse crimes than Hodgkins but judge argues he was not a minor player in the "attack."
Moss was appointed by Obama in 2014.
Prosecutor: Intended goal was to subvert the election and stop peaceful transfer of power.
Moss interrupts, points out Hodgkins isn't charged with violent crime.
Prosecutor claims his presence in Senate gallery with his "flag and his goggles" amounted to intimidation.
DOJ: Context of what was unfolding around him. He had warning signs and "chose to press forward."
January 6 "writ large" and "significant role" of deterrence to warn those who want to attack the Capitol again. "Shared goal to thwart the vote count" and "imperiling democracy."
The threat of imperilment to democracy. Hours long hand-to-hand combat, spraying chemical irritants.
EMOTIONAL INJURIES: Staff members left cowering in their offices were terrified. As were law enforcement officers. They will bear emotional scars for many years if not forever.
Extensive damage to Capitol. ($1.5 million.) "He spent 30 minutes inside the building. He stood feet away holding his flag saluting, cheering and ranting and jeering."
🙄
"He was ready for conflict. He proudly posed for selfies. He made himself part of the action."
Prosecutor keeps bringing up his flag as evidence of some sort of nefarious thing? "Waving his flag." WTF.
She's struggling with correct term to describe this "horrific day. This was a grave danger to our democracy. He surely participated in the grave injury to our democracy."
Dear God, I think she might cry. She can't think of a worse example of flouting the law than January 6 and halting the transfer of power from one president to another.
"THIS WAS AN ACT OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM."
Joe Biden's DOJ.
"Back to need for deterrence and frame this as domestic terrorism." Enhancement does not require a charge of domestic terrorism.
They will use a 38-year-old man, fully employed, no criminal record, volunteers his time, working class American as example of "domestic terrorist."
"We really really need to deter conduct associated with domestic terrorism."
18 months will hold him accountable "send a loud and clear message to would-be rioters, if and when they're caught, they'll be held accountable."
Moss is sympathetic to argument for "deterrence."
Hodgkins giving an emotional and heartfelt statement.
Said he went to DC to support a president he loves.
"I FULLY ACCEPT JOSEPH R. BIDEN AS THE RIGHTFULLY ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES."
*Biden smiles*
Conviction will cost me several of my civil rights and pay $2,000 in restitution. He will pay in full this week.
I will lose my job I love. Expected to be promoted to mechanic under apprenticeship he's currently in. Will lose home I rent, need to find home for 2 cats.
Asks for grace of court and God. Now his lawyer speaking.
"We don't sentence people collectively. We sentence people individually." He's disputing DOJ repeated reference to "rioters" in Hodgkins sentencing memo.
He's now choked up. Lawyer will be deployed tomorrow.
Took an oath to fight enemies foreign and domestic.
"Paul Hodgkins is not my enemy."
This is not domestic terrorism and government has not charged anyone with the crime. Protest that turned into a riot. DOJ is "gaslighting the country."
YESSSS SIR.
Lawyer Patrick Leduc detailing acts of domestic terrorism dating back to 1950s. OK City bombing, Boston marathon, etc.
"Words have meaning. I have been shot at by real terrorists. If we're going to label this as domestic terrorism, where do we draw that line?"
Then what about Portland and Minneapolis?
Those are protests that turned into riots.
MOSS: No comparison to January 6. "More than a simple riot." He's blasting back that J6 was not a First Amendment activity. Halls of Congress emptied during "sacred" certification.
Moss avoids antifa, BLM destruction.
Again, Americans charged in Capitol breach face a unique set of laws not applied to others. Moss' comments reflect exactly why. It was so "horrific" that no other comparison applies.
"Paul came to Washington by himself [from Florida] on a bus."
"I am proud to represent him. I am blown away by the kind of man he is."
Lawyer says if court orders just sentence, other 500 defendants will be eager to agree to plea arrangements.
"There will be a large section of American society who will never forgive" Hodgkins for what he did. Explaining how incarceration, felony charge will impact the rest of his life.
Brings up Kavanaugh protests. 227 people arrested. Protest was organized, same intent...
to disrupt official proceeding. They paid $50 fines.
This will be far worse than what Kavanaugh protesters faced. He's worn ankle bracelet for five months. "We will make this working class man homeless and unemployed" for a few minutes in Capitol?
Dear God. Moss wonders if a light sentence will encourage others to "storm the United State Capitol" in the future. These people are so f*cking dramatic.
These Beltway judges, prosecutors offended Americans entered their hallowed space. Period.
They view DC as their fiefdom.
"This man lives in the poorest area of Tampa. He has been working 40 hours a week. On his weekends he gives food to people poorer than him and he's poor."
The news media is going to "blast him out" for what he did. Washington Post will blast his picture.
Moss taking brief break. Some excerpts from Hodgkins' support letters:
"He pursued his goal of becoming an Eagle Scout with equal dedication, displaying necessary leadership qualities in achieving that dream. He has never failed to lend help and support to those in need."
"I have known Paul Hodgkins since 2009 when I hired Paul to wash and wax our 40 foot motorhome. He was diligent. He was very helpful in assisting us with our severely and profoundly medically fragile son by transporting/transferring him in his
hospital crib in our home."
"He has adopted several stray cats and is a loving, responsible pet owner. He has volunteered at homeless shelters and soup kitchens. Whenever anyone in our circle of friends asks for help to move or needs something hauled, Paul is there with his truck ready to help."
"I have known Paul Hodgkins since 2007 (approx. 14yrs) I met him when we worked together at CVS Distribution center in Vero Beach FL. I was somewhat shocked to hear about these charges against him. It is so out of character. I ask that you find it in your heart to... show mercy."
Moss back: I want to stress that I am very focused on sentencing you and not the others there. (DUH)
"You carried a large red flag with Trump 2020 on it. You raised your flag in salute." MY GOD how will we recover.
"Members of Congress were forced to flee. Think about that." 🙄
Moss: "They succeeded in delaying the solemn act" of certifying the president.
"THAT IS CHILLING."
"Democracy requires the cooperation of the governed. Democracy is in trouble. This is a damage that will persist in this country for decades."
"The attack on the Capitol...
punished our happy history. It means we are all fearful about the next attack as we never were."
"Those are enormous harms caused that day."
"People who were traumatized, killed that day." They will carry it the rest of their lives.
"That was an assault on...democracy."
"It left a stain that will remain on this country for years to come." These are grown-ups, little reminder.
Moss fixated, too, on Trump flag. This was a "symbol" he was loyal to a man and not the nation.
"The symbolism is unmistakable. He was staking a claim on the Senate floor declaring his loyalty to a single individual over a nation."
"There is no existing benchmark. This case defies comparison to other obstruction cases."
Moss: Sentences Hodgkins to 8 months in prison. Then 24 months probation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hearing about to get underway in the courtroom of Judge Jeb Boasberg, who continues to escalate his personal grudge against the Trump administration by demanding "due process" proceedings for 130+ illegal Venezuelans deported under the Alien Enemies Act.
Boasberg, despite being bench slapped by SCOTUS and DC circuit in the matter, now wants to know how the DOJ will arrange "virtual" hearings for the illegals, now back in their home country of Venezuela, or return them to the US including making flight arrangements.
ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt: The illegals in Venezuela should be permitted to file a paper report related to their "due process" claims. Those in third party countries should be allowed to demand virtual hearings.
"No matter what we propose, the government opposes it." No duh.
Boasberg wants to know how many AEA subjects have left Venezuela. Gelernt says a "handful."
"The people who made it out of Venezuela want to clear their name," Gelernt says. Boasberg asks if any have presented at port of entry--he is now suggesting that should be the case.
"We know people who would come back." NO THANKS
"I don't see anything the government is offering. There are some who want to come back and seek asylum. If the only option is to come back, that's what they will take," Gelernt says.
Gelernt tips his hand as to next step: get illegals' designation as Alien Enemies Act subject and/or a member of Tren de Aragua (a foreign terrorist organization) lifted so they can seek asylum.
"If they prevail, they would pursue regular immigration proceedings and seek asylum." This is what both Gelernt and Boasberg want as the outcome.
Boasberg asks Gelernt about how the US government could facilitate the return of the illegal Venezuelans. Boasberg: "Would you request a government plane?" LMAO
Boasberg continues his role as de facto ACLU attorney--prompting Gelernt to explain how the AEA itself based on the TdA designation of the illegals is baseless. (This entire question is now before the 5th Circuit Court--oral arguments held last month. Headed to SCOTUS.)
"It's just dumb," Boasberg says of the nature of the president's AEA proclamation using TdA as justification to immediately remove illegal Venezuelans.
"Nothing suprises me in this case," Boasberg snarks, "but it would not suprise me if none are Tda members."
Boasberg is pushing Gelernt to demand of the government more specific evidence of TdA association for those removed. Now discussing the use of tatoos--Gelernt says the illegals "are so far removed" from TdA and that TdA does not use tatoos to identify gang members.
Boasberg asks about political climate in Venezuala and whether the illegals are still afraid/targeted by the government post-Maduro. Gelernt says his clients are still afraid.
So I decided to burn up my PACER account and do random checks on Judge Patrick Schlitz's claims that ICE violated 96 court orders in Minnesota immigration cases this month alone.
"ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence," Schlitz, without evidence, wrote in a court order this week.
Well--his very first citation does not exist. There is no Jan 24, 2026 court order in Hakan v Noem. There is a Dec. 24, 2025 court order (hard to tell exactly what was "violated" in the judge's order) but Schlitz just misrepresented this case in his own court order
It is very important to note that Minnesota judges have uniformly ordered the immediate release of ALL illegals who have filed habeas petitions. I believe the last court was 60+.
In the process, judges impose unreasonable time limits on the DOJ to respond to petitions then release the illegals claiming the administration did not reply in time.
A total racket.
Now let's turn to Francisco E.O. v. Olson and the cited order that Schlitz claims represents ICE's violation of court orders in Jan 2026.
Would be nice to read it--BUT IT IS SEALED.
Schlitz knows that most habeas docs are sealed so it's impossible for the public to judge for themselves the nature of the judge's accusations.
The docket does, however, reflect some back and forth between this judge and Pam Bondi, resulting in the judge on Jan 29 saying--"although the Respondents willfully violated the Court's Orders [again, we have no idea what this magistrate judge claims in the sealed order], the Court appreciates Respondents' counsel's communication and their efforts to promote Respondents' compliance with the Court's directives. The Court therefore declines to impose any sanctions. This matter therefore shall be closed."
OOPS actually--Schlitz in his haste to put together this appendix claiming ICE violated more court orders in Jan 2026 than some federal agencies violate in their entire history (LOL), he double counted the same order.
So out of the 1st 7 cases Schlitz listed--one does not exist and another is counted twice.
> Jack Smith not only pushed for an unreasonable trial date of Jan 2024, he asked the Supreme Court to take the “extraordinary” step of bypassing the DC appellate court in deciding on Judge Chutkan’s immunity order, which denied all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. (SCOTUS said no.)
> When Trump’s defense lawyer objected to the hasty trial date due to the massive amount of discovery discussed here, Judge Chutkan said the president should have been reviewing discovery BEFORE the indictment, referring to Jan 6 committee materials. Chutkan something to the effect of, “you knew you were going to be charged you should have prepared ahead of time.”
In his application for cert before SCOTUS, Smith called his J6 indictment against the president an “extraordinary case.” Having Chutkan rule on the unprecedented question of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution in just 7 weeks; oral arguments set by DC appellate 5 weeks later; and DC appellate court opinion upholding Chutkan issued 4 weeks after that was not quick enough for Smith.
In fact, Justice Roberts criticized Chutkan and the appellate court judges for their rush to judgment in such an historic matter.
Smith, as usual, lied about why he sought a hasty trial schedule.
This is just a taste of what the president and his lawyers had to deal with before Judge Chutkan.
She spent several minutes arguing with attorney John Lauro about the trial date and voluminous discovery. Not only did Chutkan say repeatedly—you knew this indictment was coming—she suggested he was a bad lawyer for not reading not yet produced discovery before the indictment.
This is from the hearing held 4 weeks after Smith announced the J6 indictment:
Chairman Jim Jordan opens Jack Smith hearing with overview of Russiagate, various prosecutions of President Trump, and an account of Smith's unprecedented two criminal indictments against the president.
Notes that Judge Cannon disqualified Smith under the Appointments Clause and how he successfully pushed (thanks to Judge Chutkan) to release a report on the Jan 6 case after the election.
Oh FFS Jamie Raskin opens his statement by acknowledging the attendance of the 4 J6 celeb cops including Mike Fanone and Harry Dunn.
It is truly unfortunate those lying clowns haven't been charged with perjury.
Raskin now swooning over Smith's resume--I am sure he will omit SCOTUS' 8-0 reversal of Smith's case against the McDonnells.
Raskin calls Judge Cannon a "sychophant" for not permitting the release of Smith's report on the documents case. Raskin claims Smith cannot talk about the docs case due to those orders however Smith has already openly talked about the case.
Sen. Rand Paul just published records showing the FBI's two-year surveillance of an American citizen suspected of entering the Capitol on Jan 6. The spying included physical surveillance of her home and movements; she, like thousands of others were placed on a TSA "terror" watch list...
Christine Crowder is a Catholic school teacher and her husband a federal air marshal. Paul released 70 pages of docs related to the FBI's full throated investigation into an innocent American.
Just imagine how many times this happened--and not just to J6ers--under Chris Wray:
Outrageously--DC US Attorney Matt Graves wanted to pursue a criminal prosecution of Crowder DESPITE the FBI finally admitting it did not have enough evidence to bring a case against Crowder.
Why Graves is still off the hook for his handling of J6 prosecution in beyond me:
🧵on his misrepresentations, falsehoods, and straight up lies told by the special counsel to House Judiciary Committee on Dec 17.
Smith had no evidence that any of the so-called "classified documents" he claimed to have found were in boxes temporarily stored in MAL ballroom or bathroom after the president left the White House.
Lie #2:
Smith was extremely aware of the 2024 election calendar--which is why he took what he himself described as the "extraordinary" step in asking the Supreme Court to bypass the DC appellate court--the next normal step-- in considering Judge Chutkan's Dec. 2023 order denying all forms of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution and take up the immunity question immediately. (SCOTUS denied his request, Chutkan's order was upheld by 3-judge panel in Feb. 2024, which was then considered by SCOTUS in April. On July 1, 2024, SCOTUS issued its decision providing for a broad swath of immunity for acts in office, resulting in a major gutting of Smith's J6 indictment.)
Lie #3: That the unarmed protest at the Capitol on Jan 6 was an "attack" incited by the president and the still unsubstantiated allegation that 140 officers were injured by protesters.
Keep in mind: Smith's J6 indictment was four counts: two related to 1512(c)(2)--a corporate fraud statute unlawfully used in J6 cases according to SCOTUS in the Fischer decision--and two other VERY vague conspiracy counts, conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy against "rights."