VedaTells✨ Profile picture
Jul 19, 2021 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
✨Indra and Ahilya ✨

I'm going to cover the Vedic perspective+ I will cover historical aspect also. Image
This story comes in Valmiki Ramayana,Devi Bhagvatam ,BrahmVaivarta that "Indra made physical relations with Devi ahilya(wife of महर्षि गौतम) . Hence Indra is called जार(lover, destroyer) of अहिल्या. ImageImageImage
Indra is called the जार of ahalya in these sections of Vedas:-
अहल्यायै जारेति। अहल्याया ह मैत्रेय्या जार आस {ShādVimsa Brahmana 1.1}
अहल्यायै जारेति {Shatpath 3.3.4.18}
Kumaril Bhatt in his commentary of mimansa sutra 1.3.7 has written:-
अहर्लीयते यस्यां सा( Ahilya is the "night") and Indra means the sun, it comes from the root इदिँ परमैश्वर्ये{DP 1.65}
इन्द्र is the जार of अहिल्या means Sun destroys the night. Image
Shatpath brahmāna 4.5.9.4 calls सूर्य 🌞 as Indra. Image
In Nirukta{3.16, 3.3.4) सूर्य is clearly called the जार of रात्रि. You might be wandering what is the meaning of गौतम then? "उत्तमा गावो रश्मयो यस्य स:" That which has Excellent rays is Gautam. Here "चंद्रमा 🌝 moon is Gautama".
{See the image right रश्मि means गो} ImageImage
So the meaning that has to be taken as "Son(Indra) is the Jaar(destroyer) of the Ahilya (night) { The wife on Chandra}.

Now come to the historical aspect. Ahilya is the manas Daughter of Brahma ji,Indra a Deva. Both do not fall under the rules of human beings. Image
Whatever Indra did he did it for the well being of the Devas. See the image below from the बालकांड of Ramayana.

The Gautama had destroyed the Forest Dandakaranya the Devas were afraid. Just to make him angry(and to take the Curse). Anger+Curse destroys the Tapa. Indra did such Image
Devi Ahilya knew he was Indra. She did it even after knowing he was Indra.{Balkanda 1.48.19-20}
She is calling him as सुरश्रेष्ठ means she knew He was Indra. The verse 19 is more clear. Image
Indra did many works by making him as Victim.
{i} Completed the work of the Devas {ended the tapa of Gautama}
(ii) Settled the Kamnas of Devi Ahilya after which she got cursed and at the end she met Bhagvan Rama. Image
Remember Devas are not free from कर्मफल. Indra does the karmas for लोकसंग्रह, In this incident he got cursed by maharshi Gautama. In other incident He got cursed for killing वृत्र. Image
Swananad Gajanana has described it in other way through व्युत्पत्ति.
अहिल्या as earth, गौतम as गोविज्ञान of कृषि, Indra as king.
Read the doc here
docs.google.com/document/d/1_X…
The thread about Brahma and Ma Saraswati
*Chandogya Upanishad , subtitle has slight misspelling
@rattibha unroll 😉

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with VedaTells✨

VedaTells✨ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vedatells

May 1, 2023
Homosexuality is clearly mentioned as a Paap Karma in Smritis

"यो विप्रः पुंसि संसर्ग' स्वदारेषु रतिं मुखे ।
यमलोकमुपागम्य तत्र वासः सदा भवेत् । (मार्कण्डेय०)

"यो विप्रः पुरुषं गच्छेत्" पञ्चबाणातुरः खलः।
..तस्य वीर्यं क्षयं याति मृतो नरकमश्नुते।। (देवल०)

पुंसि च (विष्णु०)
Complete verses
यो विप्रः पुंसि संसर्ग स्वदारेषु रतिं मुखे ।
कुर्याद् यदिह पापात्मा तद्रेतः क्लीबतामगात् ।।
यमलोकमुपागम्य तत्र वासः सदा भवेत् ।
तस्यैव निष्कृतिर्नास्ति पुनःसंस्करणं विना ।। (मार्कण्डेयस्मृति)
यो विप्रः पुरुषं गच्छेत् पञ्चबाणातुरः खलः।
स्वदारेषु मुखे वापि यभेत् पापपरायणः।।
तस्य वीर्यं क्षयं याति मृतो नरकमश्नुते। (देवलस्मृति १७३३)
Read 5 tweets
Aug 25, 2022
In Rgveda Shakala samhita the total number of letters is 4,32,000. Rishis have calculated every word of Veda so the knowledge can be passed without a single letter getting lost. Image
Similar is the case with the tradition of interpretation. You can notice it in DarshanaShastras too. In Vedanta the debate about what is the meaning of अथ in the sutra अथातो ब्रह्मजिज्ञासा has taken many books to explain.
Interpretation of vedas require much effort.
Durgacharya has written {meaning in image

ईदृशेषु शब्दार्थन्यायसङ्कटेषु मन्त्रार्थघटनेषु दुरवबोधेषु मतिमतां मतयो न प्रतिहन्यन्ते, वयं त्वेतावदत्रावबुद्ध्यामह {Nirukta 7.31}

Here the meaning of the term "वैश्वानर" is being discussed Image
Read 5 tweets
Jul 10, 2022
"Women didn't used to cover their breasts before British Rule" All this is Victorian Morality
Traditions, customs and dresses may vary within communities and region. But you can't say that "women didn't used to cover the upper part of body". There are different types of clothes mentioned to serve the purpose.
All of us agree that Kalidasa is Pre Mughal, Pre-British and maybe pre to any type pf cultural invasion.

In his book ritusamhar we find two instances

(1)तन्वंशुकैः कुङ्कुमरागगौरैरलंक्रियन्ते स्तनमण्डलानि (RituSamhara 6.5)

(2) स्तनेषु तन्वंशुकमुन्नतस्तना (RituSamhara 1.7)
Read 17 tweets
Mar 11, 2022
For a second imagine all these stories to be true(in the way he has represented).

anecdotes cannot be against Vedas. By saying that the "meaning of Vedas should be taken from Itihasa and Puranas" we mean that history and Puranas are only for Vedas. Not against it. ImageImage
If the method is derived from the Anecdote going against Veda or Smriti. So Due to the stability of the fame of Ravana,till date who abducted someone's wife such method can be derived :-
"कीर्तिकामः परदारानपहरेत् (the person who desires fame has to abduct the wife)"
But it's not derived because it's against Veda and Smritis. Therefore, one should imagine that the anecdotes holds no authority to determine what is dharma and adharma by themselves...
Read 6 tweets
Dec 14, 2021
Although there are many commentaries on BhagvadGita especially in the tradition of advaita vedanta. I'm going to name a few of them.

The first one as we know is the bhashya of Sri Shankracharya.
(2) The commentary of AnuBhuti Swarupa Acharya. He is the writer of "Saraswat Vyakaranam".

(3) The Tika of AnandaGiri. This tika gives the clear meaning very beautifully.

(4) "BhashyarkaPrakash" Tika of Bellamkonda Ramraya Kavi.
(5) Shankaranandi Tika of Swami Shankaranand

(6) Gudartha Dipika of Madhusudana Saraswati

(7)Bhashyotkaraha Dipika of DhanpatiSuri.
Read 6 tweets
Sep 22, 2021
😂 Real Ramayan, Lol who takes these people seriously

In the very first page see how ill logic "Rama was a human not an avatara" this is the propaganda they are promoting and Hindus will be fine with this.

Also in this "pure ramayana "Hanumanji used monoplane ✈️ to reach lanka
If you want I can send you pdf of this $hit , don't waste your money buying it.

Here are some very easy answerable questions from their ramayana which goes against their siddhanta
drive.google.com/file/d/176Ao8N…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(