Hello San Francisco. I'm attending UCSF's July New Hospital Community Meeting, related to the design of the upcoming UCSF Parnassus campus remodel. Stuart Eckblad, their VP of Major Capital Construction Projects, says the community should be happy w/ updates to mass and size.
Stuart Eckblad is turning the meeting over to Jason Frantzen with Herzog & de Meuron to discuss design and massing.
Design guidelines
This hospital is truly millennial, because it has a "brand vision"—"a place that creates a strong connection to the people around it" and "promotes health and well-being for everyone"
The vision includes a vision for "omnipresent nature" and "residential scale," which I'm not sure go together????
I missed a slide called "Reducing the Perceived Scale." The next slide shows the original vision. Frantzen says people were worried about this.
Frantzen is talking about taking the overall volume and breaking it into smaller elements. It looks like they're not talking about making it shorter, but removing horizontal space from the middle of the hospital.
Conceputal model
New preliminary rendering for UCSF Parnassus
Frantzen says the hospital will now "step" in line with the homes across the street.
Now talking about floorplans
Standard floor plan...
...extruded to six floors.
"Stepping on the façade... to reduce the impact of the building"
Now about connecting the hospital to nature/Mt Sutro
Frantzen says they've decided to not cut into Mt Sutro. The hospital will now be entirely west of Medical Center Way to minimize the impact on Mt. Sutro
Now some conceptual drawings about extending the Mt. Sutro forest into the hospital
Now there's a video of a guy showing a scale model of the site at the design office in Switzerland, looking from the northwest
I have all sorts of questions about how architects make scale models
* giant hand won't be part of the finished courtyard
Fred Whitney, UCSF VP of Real Estate, is talking about infrastructure, including oxygen tanks. It's not possible to fit all infrastructure in the building due to its size.
Whitney is handing the presentation to Jason Frantzen to talk about where to locate the bulk oxygen tanks, adjacent to the hospital. Initially they assumed a utility site on the corner of Medical Center Way and Parnassus Ave. They found it would have a visual impact on the street
They decided to locate the tanks close to where they are today on Medical Center Way, to "reduce visual impact on the community and on the street"
Frantzen is talking about screening the oxygen tanks so they blend in. Second picture shows area of impact.
Richard Kennedy is now discussing landscaping.
Kennedy says birdsong can contribute to a sense of wellness for patients and visitors. He says the design team trying to find ways to create presence of nature in the hospital, especially on the building terrace on level six.
Rendering of a planned public garden in the hospital
Public rooftop on level six
Prospective rendering of the garden looking out over the City
Soil buildup will be needed for shrubs and plants to grow
Kennedy says that public dining will be a key attraction of the site [hospital food?]
Dining, in the future
Frantzen is turning the meeting over to Lily Wong, Associate Director of Community Relations at UCSF, to moderate the community discussion
There's a question about how the sixth level will be accessible to the public. Jason Frantzen says elevators will be available in the lobby.
Second caller says it's a beautiful building, but says there's discontinuity among the aesthetics of the different buildings on site. Will there be work to create aesthetic consistency?
Alicia Murasaki, Assistant Vice Chancellor of Campus Planning, says that's not in the scope of this project, but UCSF is working on it incrementally
Lily Wong says says several written comments have requested views of the project from the ground level in the surrounding neighborhoods.
The next caller lives near the site and says that the agree about the hospital not being consistent. They say it has a base, coronode, and wedding cake top. "The wedding cake doesn't really relate to anything."
Dennis Antenore is here. He says he's confused about the oxygen tanks being located east of Medical Center Way. He's asking about the availability of water for all this landscaping. "We're in a drought. It's long term—it's going to be very long term." So that's a concern.
Dennis Antenore, IIRC, is part of the coalition suing UCSF under the California Environmental Quality Act, along with Calvin Welch
Richard Kennedy says the plants to be installed will be native to California. He says the plants will be low-maintenance with as low water usage as they can make it to be.
Jason Frantzen with the design firm is answering Dennis Antenore's question about the location of the oxygen tanks
Next caller says the hospital looks lovely, but they wonder if the pullback from Medical Center Way has increased the height of the building. That would be higher than what's in the EIR. Also, they say that in the development of SF General Hospital, there were underground depts.
[I think they're asking if there would be underground departments or underground tunnels?]
Frantzen says they worked to bring the height within 294 feet in the original planning documents. The final heights are being defined now and will be provided in future documents.
Next caller is Ildiko Polony, executive director of Mt. Sutro Stewards. She's asking how big the oxygen tanks will be and if there will be a full plant survey. She says Mt. Sutro Stewards would be happy to consult on a plant list, including some rare native SF plant species.
Fred Whitney says they're looking at up to several thousand square feet of space. Anything they remove will be replaced in kind elsewhere to maintain the 61 acres.
Next caller is asking about the "overall energy supplies" for the campus/new building. What sustainable energy will be used, now that the City no longer installs gas installations? They're also concerned about water usage.
They're also asking if the outdoor garden will be truly public, because during the pandemic, outdoor spaces have been used as free public space by restaurants.
Fred Whitney says they'll have sustainability improvements with a focus on air quality, water usage, and overall community well-being. They're pursuing LEED Gold certification.
Stuart Eckblad says they intend to comply with City gas rules, but don't yet have a thorough answer.
That's all I have time for. Thanks for reading!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a community meeting for 633 Arguello, a housing project being proposed using the newly minted Constraints Reduction Act. The meeting is also being held at 633 Arguello. Toby Morris, the architect, is presenting in a hybrid format.
The project sponsor is an owner-builder-developer who wants to demolish a duplex to build a fourplex. Morris says the mayor is trying to expedite housing in some areas. Mayor wants to encourage development to remove Planning Commission hearings for "this very kind of project"
Further, the project takes advantage of Supervisor Mandelman's fourplex bill in an RM-2 zoning district. The project will be a side lot line to side lot line 40 ft building w/ flats.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a meeting of the SF Board of Appeals. I am here for an absolutely wild case in which it looks like the City is quite definitely violating the Housing Accountability Act: 1228 Funston St.
A very brief summary: The case involves a permit to legalize an unauthorized unit, add an ADU + horizontal addition, and change the façade. SF Planning initiated a Discretionary Review of this permit application. The Planning Commission then imposed conditions on the permit...
...but it gets a lot more complicated than that. RoDBIGO Santos is involved. This case has stretched on for years. Multiple permits have been filed. Multiple discretionary reviews (DR) are involved.
I have found HCD's corrective action letter to San Francisco. Some quick thoughts.
The first page of the letter says SF has failed to implement required actions 1.2, 1.4, and 1.10 from Housing Policy and Practice Review. SF has also failed to implement housing element action 8.4.5 by July 31. Relevant text attached here.
On action 8.4.5, HCD seems to be taking the date in the action at face value. I had interpreted the deadline to be January 31, 2024, due to a drafting error. But the housing element adopted by SF includes a separate timeline column not included in the modified general plan text.
Hello San Francisco. I'm attending a Board of Appeals hearing for an appeal of the Planning Department's proposed amendment to the Planning Code that would stop the 2700 Sloat housing project—a.k.a. the Sunset Tower.
Teague says this project started as a HOME-SF project [local density bonus program] originally, and it's not anymore.
Teague confirms that the issue is related to the interpretation of Planning Code sections 102 and 270.
Commissioner Trasviña wants to confirm that the public will have more opportunities to appeal a relevant project in the future.
President Swig says there could be "any number of forks in the road" for the direction of this project and paths to appeal it.
Hello San Francisco, I'm at the Park Branch Library attending a pre-application meeting for a housing project at…hold, what's this address? 1846 Grove St? Is that…?
Yes, it's the same project that was cut in half from four units to two by Supervisor Preston at a Board of Supervisors appeal hearing!
Troy, the architect, is introducing the project. He and his partners bought the lot in 2017. In 2018 they proposed five homes, but after meeting with neighbors they made it four.
Good afternoon, San Francisco. I am attending a hearing at the Board of Supervisors on the 2022 housing element update. Supervisor Mar says, "I expect this to be a long hearing." He called for the hearing along with Supervisor Melgar and Supervisor Stefani.
Mar says it's critical that we pass a compliant housing element to keep millionds of $$$ in affordable housing and local control. "The gauntlet the state has thrown our way is immense, but I'm confident we'll rise to the ocassion."
Mar says that the failures of Prop D and Prop E mean that "we cannot get this consensus by fighting each other."