I would simply let the residents of my state buy the ice cream or not according to their preference
Real Jews are lactose intolerant is my position on this.
Just imagine Bernie up there in Vermont for decades secretly chugging Lactaid off-camera and pretending to love dairy farmers. Tragic stuff.
Like Bernie, I eat extra-sharp cheddar because the longer you age the cheese the less lactase it contains.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Matthew Yglesias

Matthew Yglesias Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mattyglesias

23 Jul
Ah, time for another round of "gunshots or fireworks?" my favorite late July game.
I can only hope the tide of violence hitting the Fancy Restaurant District will inspire some more urgency from the city government than what we've been seeing as people get killed in poor neighborhoods.

Read 5 tweets
21 Jul
Today's post: I don't think Ibram Kendi's effort to drop the elements of bigotry, animus, and discrimination from the concept of "racism" and redefine it as anything that "produces or sustains racial inequity" works.

As Kelefeh Sanneh wrote in his 2019 review of "How To Be An Anti-Racist" this turns the question of racism into an issue of complicated policy analysis in a way that's very at odds with normal usage and with the emotional valence of racism.

Now there is such a thing as a formally race-neutral policy that masks an intent to discriminate. Much of early zoning and related redlining phenomena are like that.

But the charge against "ban the box" activists isn't that they're racist, it's that they're mistaken.
Read 6 tweets
20 Jul
Two points from readers who’ve written in responding to today’s piece.

One — companies who’ve imposed either hard vaccine mandates or else soft ones (“you have to wear a mask unless you’re vaccinated”) report very high compliance rates.

Two — a lot of people in Q&A sessions believe the FDA permanently yanked approval for the J&J shot (the correction is always less prominent than the original story) and this plus the “experimental” status of the authorizations shows the shots are risky.
A point I’d add about mandates is that the companies doing them also seem to be supporting workers with time off, and alleviating concerns that missing work due to side effects will lead to repercussions on the job.
Read 4 tweets
20 Jul
As America wonders how to boost the vaccination campaign, it seems like the first thing we should try is giving the vaccine full offical approval.

Full approval boost confidence in the vaccine to at least some people, but critically it unleashed two more things:

— Gives public sector institutions confidence they can mandate it.
— Lets pharmaceutical companies run ad campaigns for it.

Vaccination rates are pretty low in even some very blue places where there's little reason to fear political backlash.

Mandates even just in those places could significantly boost vaccination.

Read 4 tweets
20 Jul
I would suggest Baker, Messacr, & Stabile (2021) as probably the most relevant empirical study finding no labor supply impact for unmarried mothers.

Schirle (2015) finds a reduction in labor supply for *married* mothers.
I think we could actually have a better-grounded debate if we focused on the question "is a reduction in the labor supply of married mothers a price worth paying to reduce child poverty?"

That correctly cleaves the two divides we see on this topic.
On the right, trads think it's fine as long as you can assemble acceptable payfors (that's the Romney project) but the dominant supply-side faction doesn't care about child poverty and *does* care about the lost labor supply of married women.
Read 5 tweets
19 Jul
I actually don’t say it was *just* the 1990s economy; I mention the strong 1990s economy as a factor after a lengthy discussion of AFDC’s poor program design and the superior design of the expanded CTC.
Scott provides a very sound refutation to an argument I didn’t make, which I think you should see as decent evidence that he lacks good counters to the actual argument.
Here’s a question: Why does anyone work a full-time job at all when they could work part-time instead and still have money?

Well, they work more hours than that because they pay you more money.

For the exact same reason people who get CTC will still want paid work.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!