2/ The latest @AmerCompass Atlas takes a spin through the data on what private equity is up to. It's very good at offering the highest salaries and attracting the top business talent (who could otherwise be doing something more productive). americancompass.org/a-guide-to-pri…
3/ Private equity is not so good, unfortunately, at investing. 20 years ago, when it could acquire small companies at big discounts, it made money buying low and selling high. But once the discounts vanished, so did the returns. Big PE firms now make most of their money in fees.
4/ Here are the findings from some recent academic studies of private equity's performance:
❌ "no significant outperformance"
❌ "about the same as public equity indices"
❌ "essentially matched returns"
❌ "no edge over public equity"
❌ "negative alpha across the board"
5/ One of the best papers on private equity comes from @CliffordAsness's AQR Capital Management, which is funny because AQR hasn't been good at delivering results for its own investors. But it's good at pointing out the failings of others. Key chart: aqr.com/Insights/Resea…
6/ Perhaps most damningly, private equity returns look random. A firm with a successful fund ("top quartile," meaning it is in the top 25% of performers) is actually least likely to have its next fund also in the top quartile, according to @MorganStanley. morganstanley.com/im/publication…
7/ Your best chance of investing in a good private equity fund may be to find a firm whose last fund performed poorly. But mostly it seems to be just guessing. Of course, you'll pay the fees regardless. This is called Coin-Flip Capitalism. americancompass.org/essays/coin-fl…
8/ "So what? Who cares?" I hear you say. Well, poorly-managed and sometimes corrupt public pension funds continue to pile money into private equity, which is bad for you as a taxpayer. And the accumulating "dry powder" (uninvested cash) is forcing ever riskier investments.
9/ Remember, most of the private equity firm's profit doesn't come from making good investments, it comes from making any investment. The management fee, then the transaction fee, then the monitoring and consulting fees... The only way to fail is to give the money back.
10/ As @BainandCompany shows, private equity firms are thus paying unprecedented prices for companies, and trying to make up for it by loading them with unprecedented debt. This won't end well for anyone. bain.com/insights/topic…
11/ How's this for a warning sign: Private equity funds sell most of their companies to... other private equity funds. Increasingly, firms are raising money in new funds to buy companies from their old funds. institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1r14l…
12/ Companies acquired by private equity have been ten times more likely to go bankrupt. Expect that to get worse. And bankrupt or not, higher debt levels leave firms less able to weather storms, more likely to cut jobs in downturns, etc.
13/ Now seems a good time to mention, "not all private equity." Some PE firms create value and build great businesses. Obviously, private capital investment is important.
That's why the policy response has to be to set market rules, not condemn the market or shut it down.
14/14 Confronting Coin-Flip Capitalism provides a comprehensive rundown of the ways that our dysfunctional financial system is misallocating capital, talent, and risk; the reasons this demands a policy response; and options for pro-market policymakers. americancompass.org/essays/confron…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ The most important thing to recognize is the basic failure of reading comprehension. Is it rude to say they don't even understand the debate they're engaged in? Maybe. But I think it's nicer than concluding that they're lying.
3/ I wrote: "Trump’s proposal ... has drawn resounding mockery from economists, and, in turn, from the mainstream media."
Pino describes this as: "Cass misdirects the reader by suggesting the mainstream media and economists are in cahoots."
Very insightful @greg_ip @wsj look today at the economic battle within the GOP between old "pro-business libertarian wing" and "a growing contingent of conservatives skeptical of big business, ambivalent about tax cuts and vocally supportive of tariffs."
Three observations:
1. Ideas matter! @AmerCompass, a team of seven with a budget below $2M, can serve as a "counterweight" to the entire legacy establishment because we make actual arguments that happen to be right. 100x spent on ad hominems and brute ideological enforcement still loses ground.
@AmerCompass 2. The primary affiliation of every person quoted in the "pro-business libertarian wing" begins "former."
"Rubio and Vance might not be representative of GOP lawmakers, who are mostly free marketers, said Patrick Toomey..." who is no longer in the Senate.
1/ My long-but-worthwhile-read @nytimes is about the American political class's self-righteous detachment from the economic and social conditions of its nation.
This is the root cause of present instability and poses the most serious long-term threat to the Republic. 🧵
2/ My story starts with my own experience as domestic policy director on Mitt Romney's 2012 presidential campaign. Questions began trickling in from New Hampshire -- what's our plan on opioids? I am ashamed to say I did not know what they were. But I was no outlier...
3/ The infamous "bitter clinger" and “47 percent” comments by Obama and Romney captured the atmosphere in the ruling class well: delivered at private fund-raisers in San Francisco in 2008 and Boca Raton in 2012, evincing disdain for the voters who lived in between.
1/ Some important announcements at @AmerCompass, as we celebrate the absurd success our scrappy team has had reshaping the nation’s major policy debates and charting the course for conservative economics. You ain’t seen nothing yet… 🧵
2/ I’m moving into the role of chief economist. Much more research and writing ahead. Of note, a weekly must-read on economics, politics, and public policy: Understanding America. It launched today. Read and subscribe here: americancompass.org/welcome-to-und…
3/ @abigailrsal, with us since the beginning as comms director, is taking over as exec director. People are often amazed that our team of six with a budget of less than $2M looks from afar to be at least the equal of @AEI and @Heritage. That’s Abby. We are in good hands.
1/ The long-predicted fiscal crisis is here, now. Interest payments exceeding defense spending. Deficits above $2 trillion, suppressing growth and hollowing out our economy.
As we show @AmerCompass, there's only one answer here. Call it the 19-20 solution... 🧵
2/ What is the 19-20 solution? It's pretty easy to understand. The only way to bring our budget back to balance is to get taxes and spending back to between 19 and 20% of GDP. Read between the lines, you discover there's actually incredibly broad agreement on this:
3/ Biden's White House budget, with his wish list of tax increases, gets revenue up to 20% of GDP. Trump budget director @russvought, in his @amrenewctr budget with his very good wish list of spending cuts, gets spending down to 19% of GDP (before assuming higher GDP growth).
1/ The latest @AmerCompass podcast covers immigration.
@MarkSKrikorian cuts through the inane spin and arcane legalese to offer the clearest explanation I've heard of how the Biden admin created the border crisis and what it will take to fix it.
Here's what I learned:🧵
2/ The key starting point is to change your mental picture of "illegal immigration." The term "border crisis" conjures people sneaking across unguarded expanses of wilderness. That seems like it could be hard to stop! But mostly that's not what is happening.
3/ The data you see isn't usually people sneaking into the country. After all, if we didn't catch them, how would we count them? The data is for everybody we do catch, mostly because they are eagerly turning themselves in.