Casey Michel Profile picture
Jul 24, 2021 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Teddy Roosevelt: First president to host a Black man at the White House, yet someone who thought the 15th Amendment was a “mistake” and that 90% of Jim Crow was justified, with Black Americans “altogether inferior to the whites.”
Still strange the US’s crushing of Filipino independence efforts doesn’t have more resonance in 21st century America—everything from widespread use of water-boarding, to efforts to cover up torture reports by Roosevelt’s administration.
William Howard Taft, then overseeing the US’s imperial project in the Philippines, describing Filipinos in terms completely at odds with his jovial public reputation:
One underrated element of TR’s foreign policy: avoiding war over Venezuela with Germany, which had been planning out a possible invasion of the US(!!):
Teddy Roosevelt’s Sec of State on Russia: “Dealing with a government with whom mendacity is a science is an extremely difficult matter.” cc @seansrussiablog
One clear theme in Teddy Roosevelt’s willingness to interfere in Latin American affairs (Panama, Roosevelt Corollary): protection/expansion of “civilization,” and the responsibility of “civilized nations.”
Here’s Teddy Roosevelt laying the groundwork for progressive taxation “on all fortunes,” either as income/wealth tax or estate tax (cc @gabriel_zucman):
US-Japanese relations nearly collapsed (into potential war?) during Roosevelt’s tenure on account of racist, segregationist policy on the US West Coast aimed at Japanese Americans:
Teddy Roosevelt said the 15th Amendment was “very unjust and bad policy,” and that Black Americans were “two hundred thousand years behind”

Teddy Roosevelt during his second term “wrote that he saw no reason why ‘95% of [Black Americans]’ in the South should be allowed to vote.”

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Casey Michel

Casey Michel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cjcmichel

Oct 27, 2023
What do you know about Russia's colonization of Alaska? What do you know of what Russian colonizers did to Alaska Natives?

And why is it still so ignored by so many Americans?

My essay in @POLITICOMag on this ongoing blank spot, and Russian colonialism: politico.com/news/magazine/…
Spending decades ignoring Russian brutality against Alaska Natives is bad enough.

But overlooking the topic meant Americans missed an opportunity to understand more about Russian colonialism—and the outright imperialism still driving Russia.
politico.com/news/magazine/…
Image
Enslavement. Massacres. Hostage-taking and sexual violence—and clear signs of genocide. All in the name of stripping Alaska Natives of their wealth.

Russia’s conquest of Alaska was as colonial as it comes. And it was no better, or worse, than other European colonialism.

Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 2, 2023
I'd forgotten that Jim Mattis was a military advisor to the UAE *before* he was appointed Defense Secretary—and never publicly disclosed that relationship.

Wild that that wasn't a bigger scandal.

cnn.com/2017/08/02/pol…
'The most prominent American cheerleader of the Emirati armed forces is former defense secretary Jim Mattis... [Mattis] again extolled Sheikh Mohamed and downplayed concerns about human rights in the UAE' washingtonpost.com/investigations…
The UAE's operations in DC is one of the—maybe *the*—most successful foreign influence and infiltration operation of the past decade.

An adviser as defense secretary, and another Trump insider as an agent. Millions saturating think tanks and universities. An army of lobbyists.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 24, 2023
We're starting to see the contours of how the Russian elite is going to pin this (ongoing, eventual) loss in Ukraine on Putin. (See: ft.com/content/800025…)

It is, to pick a term, bullshit. They were all fully on board with Russia's initial invasion, and moves to carve Ukraine.
The only reason gullible Westerners may buy this line—"It was Putin, it wasn't us!"—is because there's still a failure to recognize this invasion began not a year ago, but in 2014.

Russia's invasion began when troops rolled into southern Ukraine, and first stole Ukrainian land.
And guess what? The Kremlin's invasion was **insanely popular in Russia**. Putin's new social contract laid its cornerstone on this invasion (the "Crimean Consensus").

Beginning to carve up Ukraine was arguably the single most popular thing Putin ever did.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 22, 2023
A year into this war, Western policymakers are finally realizing one thing: for Ukraine—and Europe—to be at peace, Kyiv must regain control of Crimea.

My latest for @POLITICOMag on how things have shifted, and why Crimea is now in play.

politico.com/news/magazine/…
There are three major reasons Western views have shifted on Ukraine retaking Crimea:

1) Military necessity. So long as Russia retains Crimea, it will be a forward operating base for Russian troops to rest and resupply—a dagger aimed directly at the rest of Ukraine.
2) Economic reconstruction. So long as Russia retains Crimea, it can effectively suffocate a rebuilding Ukrainian economy—all while destabilizing Black Sea maritime security.

As @general_ben told me, “Crimea is decisive for this war.”
Read 7 tweets
Feb 20, 2023
This sure reads like Navalny has, for the first time, come out and said Crimea must be returned to Ukraine.
For more context on how Navalny’s views on Crimea have evolved: newrepublic.com/article/167944…
Between Navalny calling to respect Ukraine’s 1991 borders (Crimea!) and Khodorkovsky gesturing at potential independence for the North Caucasus, been one of the most interesting few days for Russian opposition in… some time.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 17, 2023
All of these concerns about Putin being replaced by someone “more hawkish” are faintly ridiculous.
If Putin goes because of this war, it will come after rolling military defeats, accelerating economic stagnation, spiraling internal divisions, etc.

Any successor will be immediately inundated in domestic crises. Do people really think they’ll, what, invade NATO? Launch a nuke?
Western officials need to stop buying into Putin’s “apres moi, le deluge” framing.

And they need to stop worrying about—and stop calibrating—what effect arming Ukraine will have on Russia internally. Just do whatever it takes to evict Russia from every inch of Ukraine.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(