Irkutyanin Profile picture
Jul 24, 2021 13 tweets 6 min read Read on X
OberOst was a crazy place. ImageImageImage
Image
I thought this was interesting. The genesis of Lithuanian Forrest Brothers and partisan warfare in the WW1 PoW-refugee situation. The attacks on rural German patrols don’t create dedicated anti-partisan units, but I would wager there were many notes taken during this period. ImageImage
The Germans gave up on annexing Lithuania as a practical diplomatic move. The principle of self determination could create a officially independent Lithuanian state, under a locally created administrative body. Such a state could also prevent a larger Poland. ImageImage
Unfortunately for the Taryba’s legitimacy, while it had forced the Germans to recognize its authority in an independent Lithuanian, the election of “Mindaugas II” to the kingship was not a popular move.

Lol at Erzberger supporting it to spite Ludendorff. Image
ImageImage
The Postwar German outlook was shocking to the Lithuanians. Image
The Lithuanian government had to fight for the loyalty of the minority populations. The Poles had already become hostile, the Belarusians had a independent state too. However they were able to recruit/conscript on the Zionist side of the Zionist-Bundist split. Image
The Lith Army at this stage was still too small to defend against the Red Guard. After the November Revolution in Germany, the 10th and 8th Armies of OberOst were demoralized and unorganized, even the Poles attacked them in Vilnius, though this only handed the city to the Reds. ImageImage
The Germans, however, were not going to give up. They demobilized the most unreliable units, and sent in the Saxon volunteers with the Entente’s blessing. Germany also started sending weapons and money. Image
There is a marked difference between the Lithuanian assessment of the Baltic Freikorps and the Latvians/Estonians. Balkelis has written the most positive non German assessment I’ve read thus far. Admitting the critical military role of the German units at this juncture. Image
There were three Leftist governments in Lithuania from the German Regular Army retreat to the Freikorps and Lithuanian Nationalist counterattack. Two of them were hostile to the third Bolshevik Lithuanian Soviet Republic. The Vilna Soviet & Žemaitija Committee had 2be suppressed ImageImage
The Lithuanian Soviet Republic was announced in Moscow before Lithuania, because it was entirely the creation of the Nationalities Commissar. Stalin didn’t care that the Luxembourgists were opposed to nationstates. National “determination” was internationally legitimizing 2 USSR ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Irkutyanin

Irkutyanin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Irkutyanin1

Jan 28, 2023
This is an excellent book, and I highly recommend it as a precursor to American or Canadian history, or if you are interested in early modern maritime history.

It details the inner workings of the Hakluyt commercial circle and Sebastian Cabot before Virginia. Image
The rise of Antwerp had severely undercut revenues from England’s wool and manufactured cloathing export. Exports had fallen by 85% and the Baltic/Atlantic trades were already too busy. The envisioned Northeast Passage to Cathay was hoped to save the English export economy. ImageImage
Sebastian Cabot, the son of the Venetian explorer John Cabot, was the brainchild of the first 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿exploration Joint Stock Company: “The Company for the Exploration of Unknown Lands” later the Muscovy Company.

After the St Lawrence, voyage, Cabot’s life had been a bitter failure. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 27, 2023
I think, having finished this book, Pekka has failed in many aspects of his sell by leaning too heavily into pan-nativism to tie his narrative together in the 19th century and beyond. The first part of his book, the 17th-18th century, handled this better.
What is believable power for the Iroquois to posses in the 18th century is imperfectly transferred to the Lakota in the 1880s. His other books probably have more room to describe the apex and decline of the pastoralists, but they feel rushed and confused here.
Imo, he’s probably aiming for undergraduate intro to American history with this book, which is a shame, because I think his separate portraits of individual tribes or coalitions are more useful than the meta narrative, which fails except for those with emotional connection to it
Read 4 tweets
Dec 19, 2022
Listening to Pekka Hämäläinen’s books rn. Will post a few excerpts below, so far really good for ethnographic-national history angle to early American (ethnic) history, because it restores geopolitical power to the history of peoples like Iroquois, Creek, Lakota etc.
Despite the title, this is no “Pan-Native” look into a “Indian vs White” moralistic framework. This book is summarizes a lot of important points about Amerindian warfare and struggles for power before, after, and centuries after contact with Europeans.
On the brutality of the Pequot War, and the realpolitik of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, which chose to sponsor the Narragansetts and found ready Allie’s while the colony was still in a very fragile state.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 2, 2022
ImageImage
Mexica nobility acquired their tastes for human flesh as a ritual staple food after the empire had been solidified and ritual sacrifice became formulaic. Earlier this practice would have been less systematic.

Sexual morality was strictly enforced in Mexica society. ImageImage
When the Mexica conquered the Valley of Mexico, and became the dominant power. Emperor Itzcoatl ordered all pictographic histories of previous city states to be destroyed. This ensured a Mexica monopoly on memory within in the Empire. ImageImage
Read 33 tweets
Aug 4, 2022
It’s definitely one of the hardest problems in the history of the English or Americans to get over, since the ethno-confessional aspects of the national divide, taken as a given from the 17th- early 19th centuries, have lost much of their relevance in the wider masses since.
Perhaps just a natural occurrence from the ever wider scope ascribed to “political nationality” and “national history” in the English speaking world, combined with ever intensifying and amorphous dissent against dissent supplanting both papacy as it was and dissent as it was.
So now what can an American or an Englishman make of Hastings or Anglo-Saxon liberty and jurisprudence beyond sentimental but hollow callbacks at best or isolation inside a splinter of a splinter of the Continuing Anglican movement or the “true” Presbyterian Church?
Read 4 tweets
Aug 4, 2022
Enjoyed being on for this, one point I didn’t make but wish I had is that Jefferson and a number of other founders could easily tell you of the significance of Edward the Elder, Æthelstan, and Edmund and had their own ideas of “alt history” where William was defeated at Hastings.
Despite their dislike of the Plantagenets and Toryism, both formed a fundamental viewpoint in what America should be as an inversion of “Normanism” and everything associated with it. Jefferson banned and then rewrote Hume’s History of England before reintroducing it to UVA.
This was the level of importance of England to America on any level of educated discourse of the early Republic, but you’d be hard pressed to find many grads (outside of those focused on this period) who could name an Anglo-Saxon King or a state in the Heptarchy.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(