Nick Mark MD Profile picture
Jul 25, 2021 13 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Pre-print of the #COVIDSTEROID2 RCT comparing dexamethasone 6mg vs 12mg in hospitalized patients on high flow O2 or MV:
- no difference in survival or days free of MV with higher dose dex but…
- interesting “trend towards benefit” w/ higher dose dex
📄medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
1/ ImageImageImageImage
🔑 Question: we know from #RECOVERY that steroids are beneficial in severe COVID, but what’s the ideal dose?

#COVIDSTEROID2 was a large DB multi center RCT to answer this. It randomized patients on high flow O2 or MV to either 6mg or 12mg of dexamethasone for up to 10 days.
2/ ImageImageImageImage
The 1° endpoint was days alive free of lifesupport (MV, ECMO, RRT). 2° endpoints included 28 day mortality.

Based on prior studies, they powered for a 15% relative mortality reduction (ARR ~4.5%) combined w/ a 10% reduction in life support duration.

This is pretty ambitious.
3/ ImageImage
They randomized 1000 people (outcomes were available for 971). The two groups had similar baseline characteristics:
-mostly older (median 65), mostly male (~70%)
-comorbidities were frequent (DM, CHF, CAD, CHF)
~1/2 were on High flow O2, 1/4 on MV, & 1/4 on CPAP at enrollment
4/ Image
The results were interesting.

Compared to 6mg, 12mg of decadron was associated with:
-numerically lower mortality (27.1% vs 32.3%, ARR 5.2%)
-more days free of support (22 vs 20.5)
-lower rates of SAEs (11.3% vs 13.2%)

However NONE of these reached statistical significance
5/ ImageImageImageImage
Slicing the data different ways yields similar findings: the higher dose of dexamethasone is numerically slightly better but doesn’t (quite) achieve statistical significance. ImageImageImage
What can we conclude?

It’s tempting to round “a trend towards benefit” up to “benefit” but this isn’t good science

If we round down a p=0.06 why not, for symmetry, dismiss a p=0.04 as “trending towards insignificant”?

Thresholds may be arbitrary but we shouldn’t just ignore
7/
Perhaps better to put this finding in context in two ways:
1) #RECOVERY demonstrated a huge mortality benefit by ICU standards (NNT 8); it’s hard to power a study to improve on this
2) prior studies (#DEXAARDS) had shown that a higher dose of dex (20mg/day) was safe/effective
8/
The differences b/w studies are germane:
#RECOVERY enrolled all hospitalized people w/ COVID & found a lower dose of 6mg dex was beneficial (but only in people with hypoxemia)
#COVIDSTEROID2 enrolled sicker people (all on O2) and found a “trend towards benefit” at 12 mg dex
9/
#DEXAARDS enrolled people who were even sicker, those on MV who already met criteria for ARDS

This study was pre-COVID but I think we have enough data to say, uncontroversially, that COVID ARDS is ARDS

Thus it’s reasonable to conclude that sicker pts “need” more steroids🤯
10/
Although #COVIDSTEROID2 doesn’t show a clear benefit for higher dose dex, it also demonstrates that 12mg isn’t worse than 6mg. In fact 12mg has numerically fewer serious side effects, including infxn

With diverging KM curves it’ll be interesting to see the 3 & 6 mo follow up
11/ ImageImage
Clinical 🥡:
- this is a *NEGATIVE* study…
- yet there *IS* reason to think that a slightly higher dose dexamethasone (12mg instead of 6mg) may be safe & beneficial in sicker COVID patients (such as those with ARDS on MV)
- looking forward to reading the peer reviewed 📄
12/12
Things NOT to do:
-go above #DEXAARDS dosing; older studies found HARM w/ higher steroid doses in ARDS
-continue for longer than 10 days; NO studies demonstrate benefit for this
-substitute another steroid (unless you need to); no mineralocorticoid effects w/ dex may help
13/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Mark MD

Nick Mark MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickmmark

Jul 16
The media silence on this is deafening.

Did he have a head CT? What did it show?
Did he have stitches? Tetanus shot?

The NYT ran nonstop stories about Biden’s health after the debate but can’t be bothered to report on the health of someone who was literally shot in the head?
To the people in the replies who say it’s impossible because of “HIPPA”
1. I assume you mean HIPAA
2. A normal presidential candidate would allow his doctors to release the info. This is exactly what happened when Reagan survived an assassination attempt.
washingtonpost.com/obituaries/202…
My advice to journalists is to lookup tangential gunshot wounds (TGSW).

Ask questions like:
- what imaging has he had?
- what cognitive assessments?
- has he seen a neurosurgeon or neurologist?
- he’s previously had symptoms like slurred speech, abnormal gait - are these worse?
Read 4 tweets
Jun 30
You've probably heard "don't give lactated ringers because it raises lactate"

This statement is ~98% false, but there's one crucial practice-changing fact that you need to know.

A 🧵 all about lactic acid and lactated ringers!
1/
Image
Image
First off, we should ackowledge the obvious: Lactated ringers does in fact contain lactate... 28 mEq/L in fact

BUT there's one little detail to remember:
Lactate ≠ Lactic acid

When we measure "lactate" we care about the ACID (H+) which lowers pH & causes organ dysfunction
2/ Image
But the correlation between pH & lactate is really bad!

Look at this analysis of lactate vs pH in 171 ICU patients.

There is a *weak* correlation in people with arterial lactate > 5, but even w/ lactate =10, pH ranged from 7.5 to 7.05. Quite a spread!

3/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 13
If you intubate you need to read the #PREOXI trial!
-n=1301 people requiring intubation in ED/ ICU were randomized to preoxygenation with oxygen mask vs non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
-NIV HALVED the risk of hypoxemia: 9 vs 18%
-NIV reduced mortality: 0.2% vs 1.1%

#CCR24
🧵
1/

Image
Image
Image
Hypoxemia (SpO2 <85%) occurs in 10-20% of ED & ICU intubations.

1-2% of intubations performed in ED/ICU result in cardiac arrest!

This is an exceptionally dangerous procedure and preoxygenation is essential to keep patients safe.

But what’s the *BEST* way to preoxygenate?
2/
Most people use a non-rebreather oxygen mask, but because of its loose fit it often delivers much less than 100% FiO2.

NIV (“BiPAP”) delivers a higher FiO2 because of its tight fit. It also delivers PEEP & achieves a higher mean airway pressure which is theoretically helpful!
3/
Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Jun 12
Results from #PROTECTION presented #CCR24 & published @NEJM.
- DB RCT of amino acid infusion vs placebo in n=3511 people undergoing cardiac surgery w/ bypass.
- Reduced incidence of AKI (26.9% vs 31.7% NNT=20) & need for RRT (1.4% vs 1.9% NNT=200)

Potential game changer!

🧵
1/
Image
Image
I work in a busy CVICU & I often see AKI following cardiac surgery.

Despite risk stratification & hemodynamic optimization, AKI remains one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery with bypass.

Even a modest reduction in AKI/CRRT would be great for my patients.
2/ From Nature reviews nephrology  https://www.nature.com/articles/nrneph.2017.119
During cardiac surgery w/ bypass, renal blood flow (RBF) is reduced dramatically. This causes injury, especially in susceptible individuals.

But what if we could use physiology to protect the kidneys?

Renal blood vessels dilate after a high protein meal increasing RBF & GFR!
3/ https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(18)33243-4/fulltext
Read 11 tweets
May 3
A slightly tricky blood gas case:

77 yo with respiratory distress, RR 30, SpO2 80% on non-rebreather at 15 lpm

CXR & TTE are unrevealing

pH 7.58 / PaCO2 24 / PaO2 >500 / HCO3 22

MetHb 0% CarboxyHb 0%

The ABG looks like this: Image
The answer is sulfhemoglobinemia.

Sulfhemoglobinemia is a *permanently* modified hemoglobin associated with exposure to TMP/SMX, dapsone, phenazopyridine, & other amino & nitro compounds.

It has an altered oxy-hemoglobin dissociation curve.

2/

Image
Image
Image
Sulfhemoglobinemia is easily confused with methemoglobinemia. Both have very dark colored blood & present with cyanosis. Diagnosis typically requires a specialized lab.

Spoiler: you may have heard that SulfHb is green. It isn’t really. You’re thinking of Vulcans’ blood.

3/
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Apr 28
This story is absolutely shocking.

Philip Morris International (PMI) spent millions to influence medical education by buying a series of “CMEs” at Medscape!

How else has big tobacco tried to normalize vaping & influence the medical community?

🧵
1/
theexamination.org/articles/medsc…
Recently it was revealed that Philip Morris International (PMI) had SPONSORED CME materials about smokeless tobacco products on Medscape.

I had the opportunity to review these “CME” materials & they are pretty shocking!
2/

Image
Image
Image
One truly incredible thing about this “CME” was that it has NO DISCLOSURE SLIDE!

The fact that people teaching about vaping don’t disclose their financial ties to the tobacco industry is absolutely bonkers!

Why isn’t there a sunshine act for this?
3/
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(