This is desperately, desperately needed.

Most people are shocked to hear that the judiciary is legally allowed to openly discriminate on the basis of sex and race in employment. They are.
The judiciary has avoided being held to the same standards as...literally everyone else in the country...on the grounds that they are a co-equal branch of government and should not be told how to manage themselves by another branch.
The idea that this raises is the idea that the federal government can tell a judge! who to hire! absolutely not!

We're talking about things like janitors at courthouses not having employment protections.
We're talking about the fact that the Federal Public Defenders are employees of the judiciary and so you can have women who are harassed out of federal public defense by shitty men and bosses who nakedly retaliate when informed of that harassment.
There is just literally no recourse for thousands of federal employees. None. Just because they work for the judiciary.
That needs to change.
And as a note: when I said the "judiciary" above, I mean the federal judiciary. *State* judiciaries are in fact bound by EEOC.
So I think that claims that judges are special and necessary and need this? Don't really make sense.
(The quoted tweet wasn't really a hypothetical, btw.)

Here's a case (appeal pending) which basically says "hi you're trying to sue the judiciary for harassment and retaliation, and you can't do that! good bye!"

casetext.com/case/roe-v-uni…
Shorter version: "Individuals in the judiciary harassed you, not the judiciary's policies, okay good bye!"

Super fun times!

That's why we need this.  Here, Roe's complaint is devoid of any allegation that wome

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Courtney Milan 🦖

Courtney Milan 🦖 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @courtneymilan

25 Jul
Let’s talk about sexual assault, SafeSport, and due process, because I see lots of people talking about due process and not one of those people are identifying the actual, serious due process threat that is at stake here.
I am indebted to @IjeomaOluo’s amazing essay on due process with regards to sexual harassment for helping to form my thoughts on this.

medium.com/the-establishm…
SafeSport was formed in the aftermath of the Nassar allegations so that victims of sexual assault in Olympic sport would have some kind of known, standardized process when dealing with entities that have government imprimatur in choosing Olympic athletes to represent our country.
Read 19 tweets
25 Jul
So multiple women in fencing reported this guy to SafeSport, SS couldn’t finish their investigation on time, and when every woman on the Olympic fencing team asked the Olympic Committee to do something about it, they gave the women a link to a meditation app.
I love mental health resources but what is this shit?
Meanwhile you get tossed for using weed.
Read 5 tweets
24 Jul
“I’m not really a fan of gender essentialism, next question” is a complete answer to most of the more pointed homophobic questions in fs.
I don’t like Nate’s answer at all, and this isn’t an excuse, but we also need to ask why the fuck they were asking him that stupid-ass question in the first place. Imagine telling someone who was a multiple time world champion that people think you should play hockey?
We should absolutely normalize making people embarrassed for asking shitty questions.
Read 6 tweets
23 Jul
Re:LRT We weren’t even the ones on the ground, but a lot of us involved with @RomancingRunoff basically put our lives on hold for close to a month and worked more than full time just to get money to the people on the ground because we knew it was important.
It *is* offensive to think that the enormous tax that voting takes on people’s lives is something that can be paid again and again and again.
Just think of the enormous cost of the 2022 elections to Georgia voters along.

All the people who had to spend eight, twelve hours in line to vote.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jul
My wild-ass prediction: Wyoming is going blue in 10-15 years.
This is not actually that wild. It’s just that all the pressure that fueled the front range population boom which has probably turned Colorado permanently blue apply to Wyoming.
It sounds wild because the percentages are so skewed. But the numbers are tiny. Trump won Wyoming by 120,000 people. That’s not a lot.
Read 5 tweets
22 Jul
Hey reply here with your favorite program by Yuzuru Hanyu. I’m going to experiment with downvoting, so I will temporarily downvote some.

(Will revoke in an hour or so, so no permanent mark on you me record.)
*your. grrr autocorrect, can I downvote my own typo
I looked at this thread from the Runoff account and downvoting appears to have zero (0) effect on display order of tweets. I think it’s just a vent button?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(