NEW: lots of attention on ONS Infection Survey today, but some confusion over how it should (and should not) be used to asses whether England’s fall in cases is "real"
Quick thread:
Most attention has gone on ONS “% of people testing positive” metric showing a continued rise
But "testing positive" is a lagging indicator of cases. It estimates how many *have* Covid today, not how many are *catching it* today.
Fortunately, ONS has re-introduced its incidence data (blue line), which is a much better yardstick for cases, though always 2 weeks old 😩.
So how to resolve issue of one lagging indicator, and one that’s 2 wks old?
Look to Scotland, where cases peaked 2 wks before England, so ONS indicators have had time to catch up
Turns out ONS incidence fell at exactly same time as cases 🙂. ONS positivity likewise, just lagged
So we can apply that to England: if we adjust for the 2 wk lag for "testing positive", there’s no longer any contradiction between ONS and dashboard.
Dashboard says cases falling for the last week. ONS says they were still rising 2 wks ago, but can’t speak for the time since.
Finally, if we superimpose all three metrics for England (solid lines) on top of Scotland (dashed lines) and sync the peaks in cases, England looks to be pretty much exactly where Scotland was 2 wks ago:
Dashboard cases falling, ONS indicators on course to peak and then fall.
And indeed if we add in data on Covid hospitalisations in England, we see that both new admissions and total patient numbers appear to be roughly at their peak — exactly what we would expect with cases topping out 7-10 days ago
BUT if we’ve learned anything from last few weeks, it’s that the road at this point is anything but smooth.
Week-on-week declines in English cases have been slowing in recent days, suggesting we’ve slid down off the June/July spike, but may be settling into a more gentle decline
And changing patterns of behaviour (which in turn are influenced by weather) seem to be having a big impact.
The idea that one week’s trend will continue into the following week has never felt less solid.
Conclusions:
• Picture right now looks promising. ONS does not contradict the view that incidence in England is currently falling
• But August could be a bump road due to behaviour and weather
• And September brings school and uni, which will further stir the pot
Oh, and at the risk of stating the obvious, people should really also be following @JamesWard73 and @BristOliver for more granular updates on the situation in England
My wish for the next election is that poll trackers look like the one on the right 👉 not the left
This was yet another election where the polling showed it could easily go either way, but most of the charts just showed two nice clean lines, one leading and one trailing. Bad!
Pollsters and poll aggregators have gone to great lengths to emphasise the amount of uncertainty in the polls in recent weeks...
But have generally still put out charts and polling toplines that encourage people to ignore the uncertainty and focus on who’s one point ahead. Bad!
The thing about human psychology is, once you give people a nice clean number, it doesn’t matter how many times you say "but there’s an error margin of +/- x points, anything is possible".
People are going to anchor on that central number. We shouldn’t enable this behaviour!
We’re going to hear lots of stories about which people, policies and rhetoric are to blame for the Democrats’ defeat.
Some of those stories may even be true!
But an underrated factor is that 2024 was an absolutely horrendous year for incumbents around the world 👇
Harris lost votes, Sunak lost votes, Macron lost votes, Modi (!) lost votes, as did the Japanese, Belgian, Croatian, Bulgarian and Lithuanian governments in elections this year.
Any explanation that fails to take account for this is incomplete.
Many of the NHS’s difficulties can be traced back to the deep cuts in manager numbers.
Fixing this doesn’t just unblock waiting lists, it also gives doctors more time to be doctors, and alleviates the stress and poor morale that come from having to do things that aren’t your job
Here’s another fun NHS low hanging fruit example:
A trial last year found that by running two operating theatres side by side, they cut the time between operations from 40 minutes to 2, and were able to do a week’s worth of surgeries in one day thetimes.com/uk/article/lon…
In what might be one of the most significant trends I have ever charted, the US obesity rate fell last year.
My column this week is about this landmark data point, and what might be behind it ft.com/content/21bd0b…
We already know from clinical trials that Ozempic and other GLP-1 drugs produce sustained reductions in body weight, but with mass public usage taking off — one in eight US adults have used the drugs — the results may now be showing up at population level.
It’s really striking how the Corbynite left has migrated to the Greens.
The result is a curious coalition between the older and more Nimby environmentalist base, and the new hard left/progressive influx.
These are quite different people with quite different politics!
In 2019, one in ten Green voters was from the most progressive/left segment of voters; now that’s one in four.
Big difference in policy preferences, priorities and pressure on the leadership, as we’ve seen in e.g reaction to Denyer’s Biden statement.
The most glaring tension between these two types of Green is on decarbonisation, where the older Nimby base doesn’t want pylons *or even onshore wind farms* but many of the new progressive Green vote do.
Greens are actually less keen on wind farms than Labour and Lib Dem voters!