The accounts depicted in the previous tweet are part of a network of (at least) 1393 accounts, most of which were created in large batches in June/July 2021. All have GAN-generated faces as their profile pics (all female) and female display names.
Unmodified GAN-generated face pics (so far) have the telltale trait that the primary facial features (particularly the eyes) are rendered in the same location on each image. This property becomes quite visible when the images are blended together.
Despite the fact that one can generate new GAN-generated face pics to one's heart's content, 22 of the images used by this network show up on multiple accounts (@RamonaMoore1 and @PhyllisCave4, for example).
This network does two things: tweet and retweet. Retweets comprise the bulk of its output (95605 of 96809 tweets, 99.4%), and are mostly of music-related content. The network's original tweets are music promotion directed at new followers.
Thus far, this network has (allegedly) posted all of its tweets via the Twitter Web App, with the exception of a single tweet that was somehow sent via the Twitter Web Client (the old version of the Twitter website).
Normally, the timestamps of tweets sent via the Twitter Web App are roughly evenly distributed across all 60 seconds. This is not so with the tweets posted by this network, which were disproportionately sent between 45 and 49 seconds into the minute in which they were tweeted.
One more pattern: the network alternates between high volume 12 hour periods of only retweeting and low volume 12 hour periods of only posting original tweets. The combination of these anomalies suggest the accounts are automated, despite tweeting via the Twitter Web App.
We saw a network very similar to this back in May 2021. (All the accounts in the previous network are now suspended.)
Update: a few people replied to this thread indicating that they had received DMs from accounts in this network. For science, we had @DrunkAlexJones follow a few of the accounts, and indeed received a bunch of very similar-looking DMs promoting music.
The people in these Facebook posts have been carving intricate wooden sculptures and baking massive loaves of bread shaped like bunnies, but nobody appreciates their work. That's not surprising, since both the "people" and their "work" are AI-generated images.
cc: @ZellaQuixote
In the last several days, Facebook's algorithm has served me posts of this sort from 18 different accounts that recycle many of the same AI-generated images. Six of these accounts have been renamed at least once.
The AI-generated images posted by these accounts include the aforementioned sculptures, sad birthdays, soldiers holding up cardboard signs with spelling errors, and farm scenes.
The common element: some sort of emotional appeal to real humans viewing the content.
As Bluesky approaches 30 million users, people who run spam-for-hire operations are taking note. Here's a look at a network of fake Bluesky accounts associated with a spam operation that provides fake followers for multiple platforms.
cc: @ZellaQuixote
This fake follower network consists of 8070 Bluesky accounts created between Nov 30 and Dec 30, 2024. None has posted, although some have reposted here and there. Almost all of their biographies are in Portuguese, with the exception of a few whose biographies only contain emoji.
The accounts in this fake follower network use a variety of repeated or otherwise formulaic biographies, some of which are repeated dozens or hundred of times. Some of the biographies begin with unnecessary leading commas, and a few consist entirely of punctuation.
It's presently unclear why, but over the past year someone has created a network of fake Facebook accounts pretending to be employees of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Many of the accounts in this network have GAN-generated faces.
cc: @ZellaQuixote
This network consists of (at least) 80 Facebook accounts, 48 of which use StyleGAN-generated faces as profile images. The remaining 32 all use the same image, a real photograph of a random person sitting in an office.
As is the case with all unmodified StyleGAN-generated faces, the main facial features (especially the eyes) are in the same position on all 48 AI-generated faces used by the network. This anomaly becomes obvious when the faces are blended together.
None of these chefs exist, as they're all AI-generated images. This hasn't stopped them from racking up lots of engagement on Facebook by posting AI-generated images of food (and occasional thoughts and prayers), however.
cc: @ZellaQuixote
These "chefs" are part of a network of 18 Facebook pages with names like "Cook Fastly" and "Emily Recipes" that continually post AI-generated images of food. While many of these pages claim to be US-based, they are have admins in Morocco per Facebook's Page Transparency feature.
Between them, these 18 Facebook "chef" pages have posted AI-generated images of food at least 36,000 times in the last five months. Not all of the images are unique; many have been posted repeatedly, sometimes by more than one of the alleged chefs.
Can simple text generation bots keep sophisticated LLM chatbots like ChatGPT engaged indefinitely? The answer is yes, which has some potentially interesting implications for distinguishing between conversational chatbots and humans.
For this experiment, four simple chatbots were created:
• a bot that asks the same question over and over
• a bot that replies with random fragments of a work of fiction
• a bot that asks randomly generated questions
• a bot that repeatedly asks "what do you mean by <X>?"
The output of these chatbots was used as input to an LLM chatbot based on the 8B version of the Llama 3.1 model. Three of the four bots were successful at engaging the LLM chatbot in a 1000-message exchange; the only one that failed was the repetitive question bot.
The spammers behind the "Barndominium Gallery" Facebook page have branched out into AI-generated video and started a YouTube channel with the catchy name "AY CUSTOM HOME". The results are just about as craptastic as you'd expect.
In this synthetically generated aerial video of a (nonexistent) barndominium under construction, the geometry of the roof changes, a blue building appears, and a tree vanishes, all in the course of just three seconds.
This AI-generated barndominium features a long AI-generated porch with some chairs on it. Exactly how many chairs there are depends on what angle you look at it from, however, as the chair on the left splits into three chairs as the camera pans.