Peps Profile picture
Aug 4, 2021 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
For those of you interested in what edu-geeks of times past argued about, here's a selection of journal articles* from the 70s:

1/10 Image
2/10 Image
3/10 Image
4/10 Image
5/10 Image
6/10 Image
7/10 Image
8/10 Image
9/10 Image
10/10 Image
It's both unnerving and comforting that we are still unpacking these things in the 2020s. Some problems will likely never be resolved to our satisfaction.

*All from 'Educational Leadership', clearly a kick-ass journal. Go check it out: ascd.org/publications/e… (🔓)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peps

Peps Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PepsMccrea

Nov 20
(I tried to post this thread a couple of weeks ago but I didn't get to finish it smh)

For the last 8 years, over at @Steplab_co, we've been working on a project to codify HIGHLY EFFECTIVE TEACHING.

A long-ish summary of what we've learned:

Image
@Steplab_co One of the essential ingredients of effective professional development is the provision of concrete & granular teaching 'strategies'.

These can be used as examples of 'what good looks like', which teachers can translate for their context, and practise in a productive way.
@Steplab_co However, it's also critical to help teachers see how such granular strategies fit into their broader teaching repertoire.

*Context* is as important as *content*.

Eg: How Cold Call fits into the wider goal of maximising pupil thinking, alongside Wait Time and other strategies. Image
Read 25 tweets
Nov 17
CONTINGENCY BLINDNESS

(aka why graded lesson observations don't work)

A mega-geeky thread I've been sitting on for 5 years:

Image
Imagine we wanted to create a system for evaluating doctors' effectiveness.

Suppose we designed a rubric outlining all the actions effective doctors typically perform:

→ Prescribe painkillers
→ Refer to specialists
→ Order blood tests
→ Conduct physical exams
→ etc.
Now imagine this system judged doctors solely on how well they fulfilled this rubric, regardless of whether these actions actually improved patient health.
Read 14 tweets
Nov 13
Q. How does time spent in direction instruction vs peer interaction vs practice/assessment impact learning? And does the answer differ by subject?

Burgess et al analysed the performance and data from 250+ teachers to answer these Qs.

Here's what they found:

Image
We know that teacher choices affect student learning and lives.

But we know less about exactly *how* the 'macro' moves of the classroom predict learning.
Burgess et al examined observational and GSSE attainment data for 250 maths & English teachers across 32 schools. They bucketed teaching into:

• Direct instruction
• Student peer interaction
• Personalised instruction
• Practice and assessment

And hunted for correlations.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 10
When multiple teachers within a school all use the same routines, special things happen.

A short thread on collective acceleration:

Image
First up, routines have the potential to be powerful tools for student learning, feelings of belonging, and responsive teaching.

However, their power is only unleashed once they become automated.
The problem is that it can take anywhere between 20 to 60 repetitions to achieve automation...

which could be weeks or months, depending on (A) how often we see our classes and (B) how frequently the routine gets run within each lesson.
Read 16 tweets
Nov 6
For the last 8 years, over at @Steplab_co, we've been working on a project to codify HIGHLY EFFECTIVE TEACHING.

A long and geeky thread on what we've learned:

Image
@Steplab_co One of the essential ingredients of effective professional development is the provision of concrete & granular teaching 'strategies'.

These can be used as examples of 'what good looks like', which teachers can translate for their context, and practise in a productive way.
@Steplab_co However, it's also critical to help teachers see how such granular strategies fit into their broader teaching repertoire.

*Context* is as important as *content*.

Eg: How Cold Call fits into the wider goal of maximising pupil thinking, alongside Wait Time and other strategies. Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 3
Routines are valuable, but only once they have become automated.

Until then, we must treat them as an investment:

Image
Routines are sequences of action which are prompted by a cue, all of which happens with minimal thought.

They have the potential to enhance student learning, confidence, and belonging.

And free up teacher cognitive capacity to monitor learning and be more responsive.
When we establish a new routine, we will be less skilled and our students will be less familiar.

This entails greater effort all round, and we can be tempted to give up.

However, this effort is not being wasted. It is merely being stored 🔋
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(