For those of you interested in what edu-geeks of times past argued about, here's a selection of journal articles* from the 70s:
1/10
2/10
3/10
4/10
5/10
6/10
7/10
8/10
9/10
10/10
It's both unnerving and comforting that we are still unpacking these things in the 2020s. Some problems will likely never be resolved to our satisfaction.
*All from 'Educational Leadership', clearly a kick-ass journal. Go check it out: ascd.org/publications/e… (🔓)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A mega-geeky thread I've been sitting on for 5 years:
↓
Imagine we wanted to create a system for evaluating doctors' effectiveness.
Suppose we designed a rubric outlining all the actions effective doctors typically perform:
→ Prescribe painkillers
→ Refer to specialists
→ Order blood tests
→ Conduct physical exams
→ etc.
Now imagine this system judged doctors solely on how well they fulfilled this rubric, regardless of whether these actions actually improved patient health.