Lusaka. Lubumbashi. These two cities are only 550 KM apart from each other. Kindred spirits. Resource boomtowns, both more organized than the rest of their countries, both brimming with tons of development. This is a Southern African/Copperbeltish derby.
Which is the better city
/2 Lusaka is home to 2.7+ million people and is one of the fastest growing cities in Africa. Neglected while a part of a colonial federation with Zimbabwe + Malawi, the city has boomed since independence. Its an overstatement perhaps, but many adore the city's hospitality.
3/ Lubumbashi hosts 2.5+ million people and is the Congo you don't see on TV. Relatively prosperous, peaceful, and modernizing, with a continentally famed football team to boot in TP Mazembe(5X CAF champions). The city is host to a thriving resource economy.
4/ Lusaka from the 1960s through 1980s for many Southern Africans meant freedom. On the border of numerous white ruled states, Kaunda's Lusaka opened the door to activists, freedom fighters, and rebels. The Lusaka manifesto issued there was decades ahead of its time.
5/ Lubumbashi was initially set up by Belgian settlers in the early 20th century, who established vast copper mines there that would make Congo the talk f the world's resource community. Lubumbashi would in time emerge to represent the hub of Katanga in Congo.
6/ Lusaka at this point is not only the economic engine of Zambia but also in many ways its cosmopolitan heart. Due to the broader One Zambia, One Nation agenda, there has overtimes emerged specific citywide slang/form of speaking that is truly a Lusakan creation.
7/ Lubumbashi Pics
8/ Lusaka Pics
9/ Lubumbashi Streetscape
Sleepy roads, nicely organized, the traditional Congolese beats on this video lulled me into a pleasant nap.
10/ Lusaka Streetscape
African Boomtown! Energy on the streets, pleasant highrises emerging, traffic congestion at numerous points. Growing pains of a city emerging.
11/ Vote Lusaka if you want a taste of Nairobi thirty years ago, and a city growing quickly out of a former sleepiness towards becoming one of the continent's major hubs.
Vote Lubumbashi if you want a taste of the grandeur of Congolese culture with stability and modernization.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is my ranking of Asian countries in terms of their global influence and historical contribution.
We start with SSS,
China and India are planetary civilizations unto themselves, that influenced not only their homelands, but all of SE Asia, Central Asia, and the entire world.
Saudi Arabia birthed Islam, it is the lone country in SS as a result. Islam has shaken our world since it was born in the Arabian desert,
Modern Saudi Arabia is also in the midst of a modern renaissance.
In S, we have two giants in Japan and Russia that shook Asia tremendously in the 19th and 20th century.
They fail to reach SSS and SS mainly because their influence was not as dominant pre 19th century.
Outdated perceptions that the mainstream won't get until like 2040,
- Asia is to the current world what Europe was to it in 1900, the center of global progress.
- France is now the world's best footballing country, not Brazil.
- All Anglo healthcare systems are terrible.
- Singapore and Dubai are the new actual Switzerland, Switzerland is over.
- Ethnic groups who spend all the time debating gender wars will lag behind other ethnic groups who don't.
- American presidential elections largely are just kayfabe.
- Afrobeats is likely past its creative peak, it'll continue having hits but it's entering its overbloated commercial era, kinda like where Rap was around 2001/2002.
- No one under 30 in Africa seriously regards either Nigeria or South Africa as continental powers/giants.