THREAD: The scene of attack by members of Azov movement on the car of ex-president Poroshenko in 2019. The man in the green Reconquista T-shirt is Rodion Batulin who worked with the supposedly assassinated Vitaly Shishov at the Belarusian House in Kiev.
Next to him is Nikita “Odissey” Makeev, a Russia neo-nazi and a senior PR person at National Corps, Azov movement’s political wing. The reason for attack was Poroshenko’s failure to grant Ukrainian citizenship to Azov fighters.
But Poroshenko did grant Ukrainian citizenship to their boss, Belarusian/Russian neo-nazi Sergey Korotkikh. During his Belarusian years, Korotkikh was part of the local cell of Russian National Unity whose senior members were implicated in the murders of Lukashenko’s opponents.
Reconquista on Batulin’s T-shirt stands for two things. Firstly, it is Azov movement’s ideology of reclaiming Europe for the white race. Secondly, it is an MMA fighting club in Kiev associated with Korotkikh.
A national of Latvia, Batulin is an MMA fighter. He won Latvian MMA championship in 2013.
A day after Vitaly Shishov was found hanged in Kiev, Batulin was banned from entering Ukraine for three years on the orders of SBU. Officials don’t comment on the reasons, citing secrecy.
In 2014, Batulin took part in a fight organised by Russian/German neo-nazi MMA promoter Denis “White Rex” Nikitin. The latter is also closely linked to Reconquista club in Kiev.
In Latvia, Batulin belonged to CK Profesionālis fighting club in Rīga. Another Latvian MMA fighter who ended up in Azov, Yury “Slavyanin” Vishnevetsky (Juris Višnevetskis), also belonged to that club.
Vishnevetsky was killed by Ukrainian security agents in July 2016 after a group of Azov fighters, including two Russian nationals, tried to rob Oshchadbank’s armoured vehicle. The foiled robbery resulted in a dangerous standoff between Azov regiment and Ukrainian security forces.
Vitaly Shishov’s death made a few people recall the 2015 murder of another associate of Korotkikh, the chief of Azov regiment’s legal department, Yaroslav Babych. He was found hanged in his flat with signs of torture. His widow blames Korotkikh for his murder.
Korotkikh’s own reaction to Shishov’s death was interesting. He first shared a post suggesting that it was not Lukashenko, but the “collective West” that was responsible for the presumed assassination. Azov’s conflict with the Belarusian antifa was cited as the reason.
A few hours later, Korotkikh was claiming that it was definitely Lukashenko and definitely not the Russian FSB who is responsible for the murder. FSB was named as the likely culprit by Bellingcat’s researcher Hristo Grozev.
Korotkikh’s biography features presumed links to both the FSB and the Belarusian KGB. In Ukraine, he operated under the patronage of the recently dismissed interior minister Arsen Avakov. End of thread.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Lots of interesting military and political nuance in UP’s interview with 3rd Assault Brigade commander and Azov Movement leader Andriy Biletsky. pravda.com.ua/rus/articles/2…
He says no amount of Western-made planes, tanks or guns will put Ukraine on par with Russia. His recipe is to invest in highly professional units, by which he of course means multiple iterations of Azov. These, he believes, can wage a successful asymmetrical war against Russia.
This is consistent with Azov’s ideology which puts at the forefront the caste of military aristocracy or - as they call it - natiocracy. The term was coined in the 1930s by OUN’s ideologist Mykola Stsyborsky who envisaged Ukraine as a “totalitarian, authoritarian” state.
Kremlin’s definition of victory/defeat in Ukraine is a mystery, so it is interesting when Rybar circulates a post clearly categorising possible outcomes. Caveat: This comes from the “angry patriots” faction, not the Kremlin. I’ll translate some of it below.
Post war trade-off is focused on:
- Ukraine’s future setup: Russia won
- NATO’s setup and European security: Russia won with a knock-out
- line of delimitation: a draw
- 1991 borders: Russia lost
- Russia’s future setup: Russia lost with a knock-out
Not able to read Putin’s mind (and mistaken when trying in the past), but IMHO the Kremlin will perceive a truce based on the current delimitation line (or anything more advantageous than Minsk) as a victory. But they will also insist on neutrality and demilitarisation.
Some trolling on the account of the Moscow drone attack by Ukraine’s most famous war crowdfunding figure Serhiy Prytula and his close ally Serhiy Sternenko, a far right personality. Prytula’s foundation specialises in acquiring drones for the Ukrainian army.
Prytula: Russians, this game can be played by two.
Sternenko: Good night, Moscow.
The pair is producing numerous sketches like this together, mainly with the aim of crowdfunding drones.
This video was released in the morning of the attack although the good night wish makes one wonder if it was recorded the night before.
An important piece by Ilya Zhegulev explaining, in broad brushes, why and how Putin made his decisions on Crimea, Donbas and Feb 2022 invasion. Based partly on Ukrainian, partly on anonymous Kremlin sources. Not the final truth, but crucial details. verstka.media/8964-2
A quick recap. The occupation of Crimea was a spontaneous, knee-jerk decision adopted by Putin on his own and against the opinion of his security aides. It was triggered by Kernes’ betrayal of Yanukovych in Kharkiv.
Donbas war was the result of private entrepreneurship by people like Malofeyev and Glazyev. Putin was not initially interested, but eventually got sucked in by getting Surkov involved.
In an interview with Interfax, Ukrainian land forces commander Col-Gen Syrsky paints a picture of Wagner’s tactics that’s quite different from the “zombie waves” propaganda narrative.
After devastating tank and artillery strikes, he says, roughy 10-men-strong assault groups proceed to capture the target, using apps which mark Ukrainian positions and backed up drones which direct artillery fire.
Not sure how this could lead to 1K per day losses sometimes claimed by the Ukrainian side.
Russian military propagandist Aleksandr Sladkov (not a dodgy milblogger, but fully-fledged government TV correspondent) has interviewed Wagner Group’s top neo-nazi Aleksey Milchakov. Not reposting the interview because it contains open justification of ethnocide and war crimes.
Sladkov openly asks Milchakov if he is a nazi. In response, the latter describes himself as Russian nationalist and claims he has nothing against the Jews and Dagestani. He dismisses neo-nazism as a subculture that was relevant in the past, but no longer.
His black sun (stylized swastika) patch appears in closing shots.
Asked about his Azov (ex)-pals (who often sport the same symbol), he says that they have betrayed their clan. Meaning Russian nazis who joined Azov.