I find myself wondering this morning how many people actually get my work - here we are, 20 years in to me continually writing, teaching, communicating, building - and I can't tell if a lot of people get it and are mostly quiet or if very few people actually got it.
Which is it?
It probably helps if I define it: here is my best short summary.
1) The human race is currently running the world like a death camp for poor humans, and particularly for the other species we farm or drive into extinction.
2) Fixing this situation is possible, but requires will.
That's the core thesis. Then,
3) It is possible, by mass collaboration using any available mechanism (open source, markets, new religious movements etc.) to live without this continuous catastrophic violence.
4) Most of the violence is well hidden from us by the machinery of the supply chain: capitalism is a direct continuation of colonialism.
is my book specifically on embedded violence in supply chains. See also a broader critiquethefutureofstuff.store
5) Systematic mapping of our dependency graphs leads to a clear and precise understanding of not only who we are harming, but how we are vulnerable to harm because of our long logistical tails.
provides logistical mapping tools (in "Dealing in Security")resiliencemaps.org
6) Existing political structures perform extremely poorly because they can't handle technically complex long duration multi-actor conflicts - government as we know it was designed for winning land wars in Europe pre-WW2 and can't handle nukes and climate vinay.howtolivewiki.com/blog/bigdeal/t…
7) It is possible to dramatically increase our psychological resilience through meditation with a specific emphasis on handling difficult emotions like fear and helplessness. Trained people turn away from the difficult situations less, and cope more.
@Gelada 9) can also be used to map our critical infrastructure, so that our homes are nearly entirely self-sufficient for energy and for water purification, and potentially we could do a lot of our small manufacturing hyperlocally too.
@Gelada 10) My company, @Mattereum is a system for handling accurate information about physical goods: we pay the bills through anticounterfieting work, but have also deployed systems for bundling CO2 offsets with gold bar NFTs to cover their production costs.
@Gelada @mattereum 11) Finally, on a broader philosophical note, I am convinced that we need new human rights far beyond the rights we currently have. I believe the best place to define and implement those rights is by dramatically expanding the human rights of children.
These two podcasts together do a fairly good job of tearing the mask off the western lifestyle - capitalist, socialist, or other - and showing people the real cost of living this way.
12) Extremely deep embedded psychological defense mechanisms prevent us seeing the simple truth that industrial overproduction (and shortage of time) are poisoning our planet and our lives.
People say "polycrisis" to describe this systemic breakdown.
1) D&D's "murderhobo" problem has always been there: it's baked into the game's DNA and indeed much of the source material.
2) But _everybody on earth_ is human by D&D standards. Nobody has _ever_ said "Germans are dark elves" or whatever. It's never been a vehicle for racism.
The real problem here is trying to fix the "murderehobo" set up with "woke."
The D&D set up is that these critters are absolutely inhuman monsters who will wipe out the human race: it's a zero-sum them-or-us situation. Real humans have only been that way in genocides & frontiers
So I *think* I'm relatively politically sophisticated –– worked with/for a couple of very senior defense bureaucrats, lifelong cypherpunk, watched 90s crypto and 2000s crypto get nuked by the Feds etc.
I have some thoughts on this, but they're a wee bit subtle. It'll need detail
FOSS software went through a similar political hell period: "Free as in beer" ripped off the development methodology of "Free as in Freedom" and stripped the value out of the Free Software ecosystem replacing it with Open Source.
Yes, "Free" and "Open" were at war.
"Crypto" now
So this lays out some of the Free Software vs. Open Source debate.
Note: "human rights" based reasoning from the Free side, and "pragmatism" from the Open side. In practice neither side won: Google ate both of them, nobody got paid, the system is fragile. web.archive.org/web/2004021319…
I’ve been thinking hard about “Mammon” as a concept. As you know I don’t much believe in Moloch: I believe that humans have 600,000+ years of overthrowing Moloch lock-in when it arises.
Mammon is a different animal: “the love of money is the root of all evil?"
There’s more
Mammon conceptually is, I think, **the knowledge that money is the only thing keeping you alive**.
Not the love of money. The fear of dying, and only money stands between you and death.
To get there you need to be unable to depend on nature, family, or society to keep you alive
Mammon is the systematic destruction of ties to/from nature, family and society.
You can’t settle by a river and fish and try to catch some deer, in a little log hut. Your downsized parents don’t have a spare room.