David Chapman Profile picture
Aug 9, 2021 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🏴‍☠️ Post-rational nihilism (Kegan stage 4.5): the only academic study I know of.

Strongly recommended for postrats, and for rationalists who wonder what that’s all about.
∮ Rationalists’ stubbornness in the face of evidence that rationalism doesn’t work is based in a well-founded fear that letting go of it could cause catastrophic personal disintegration.

That is short-term wise, but retards more sophisticated integration by parts longer-term…
I have speculated about whether the stage 4 (systematic) to 5 (meta-systematic) transition has awful, what makes it more or less awful for different people, and what we could do to help: metarationality.com/stem-fluidity-…
😇 Swan & Benack’s see trouble deriving from using rationalism as a narcissistic self-definition, which makes one “special.” That can compensate for lack of a more realistic basis for self-worth, and as long as stage 4 remains stable, one can function well enough…
∮ If rationality is a tool you use, and your competence with it is only one of several sources of self-esteem, recognizing its limits is disappointing but tolerable.

If rationalism—or any systematic ideology—is your identity, the realization is crushing. meaningness.com/eternalist-sys…
“Narcissism in the Epistemological Pit” follows the progress of a brilliant college student for whom stage 4 begins fraying in his junior year. He realizes the search for the One True System will fail…

link.springer.com/article/10.102…
A common next step is to try to build a grand meta-system that is itself systematic. This is impossible; and a misunderstanding—probably necessary at first—of what meta-systematicity consists of. You can get sucked deep into pomo at this point…
When meta-system building fails, you can fall into the pit of nihilism. All the symptoms here: rage, depression, anxiety, twisted intellectualization, grandiosity with self-loathing, contempt for the “herds of idiots” who can’t understand or face the truth meaningness.com/emotional-dyna…
Unfortunately “Sean’s” story ends in a suicide attempt and psychiatric hospitalization. All too common in 4.5 nihilism.
There is light at the end of the tunnel! At minimum, once the collapse of ideological certainty you feared and defended against actually happens, there’s the sense of relief that you don’t have hold it off any longer.

You can relax. Epistemology can’t get any more horrifying!
How can one help? Swan & Benack suggest taking the epistemological crisis seriously *as such* and not pathologizing it as mere “intellectualization” (despite postrational nihilistic justifications being typically twisted and nonsensical).

This is a necessary step toward stage 5!
“Is cognitive growth itself a valid therapeutic goal in working with this group?”

If Kegan was right re linkages between transitions in different domains, promoting development of meta-rational epistemology may support parallel development in relationships, selfness, & emotions.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Chapman

David Chapman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Meaningness

Aug 18, 2023
"People tell you everything you need to know about them in the first minute after you meet them"

On graduating, my sometime-collaborator Phil Agre went to interview for a faculty job at Yale, where Roger Schank was the senior AI guy. Phil came back somewhat shaken... (1/n)Image
Schank was a very weird dude. Phil was also a very weird dude.

In fact, everyone of significance in AI at that time was stupid, crazy, or evil.

Everyone of significance in AI now is also stupid, crazy, or evil. This is important; try not to forget it over the next few years.
Schank opened the interview with "why are you so hostile?"

Phil was not sure how to answer that, sputtered a bit, and asked why Schank would ask.

The conversation piled on layers of meta at a dizzying rate.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 2, 2023
Huh! Just figured something out (I think). It was bugging me that the silly “pandita hat” worn by Buddhist academics (pandita=pundit) reminded me of something…
It’s the “Phrygian cap” worn throughout the Iranian world in ancient times…
Is it historically plausible that the pandita hat is a variant of the Phrygian cap? Yes it is! The Sakas, an Iranian people, controlled Gandhara and Taxila, which were the centers of Buddhist academia when Buddhist academia was just getting started (circa 100 BC).
Read 6 tweets
Jun 15, 2023
An academic rant: startling cluelessness where I'd expected intelligent error...

I'm trying to understand how pomo replaced the classical undergraduate humanities curriculum, and how how people thought about it at the time, in preparation for writing about the consequences.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
@StephenPiment BTW I'm reading Douthat's Privilege, about his time at Harvard, which is relevant and fun. I recommend it! twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Replies have been helpful, thank you!

My interest here is somewhat unusual. I understand pomo, and the opposition to it. What I don't know is why decision makers didn't understand replacing the undergrad humanities curriculum would be a disaster.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 29, 2023
⌚️ I did not anticipate a future in which you lie to your watch about meeting your hydration goal for the day so it doesn't give you a hard time the next morning.
⌚️ When I was a kid, watches were all radioactive. The hands were coated in radium so you could see the time in the dark by the radioactive glow. Miniaturizing either a battery or an incandescent bulb into a watch was completely technologically impossible.
⌚️ The world with radioactive watches seems even more alien than the world with watches you have to lie to. It might as well be Ancient Rome, although I lived in it.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 25, 2023
Incisive thinking about AI interaction, drawing on Brian Smith's work and reminiscent of the ethnomethodological stance, from @jessi_cata
Incisive thinking about transness, also from @jessi_cata. "Trans" is a iron maiden category constructed by cis authorities which, for many people trying to fit into it, is grossly false to facts and harmful, painful, sometimes fatal. unstableontology.com/2023/02/07/am-…
On May 7th, @_awbery_ and I will participate in an Evolving Ground community discussion of gender, including trans/enby, from a Vajrayana Buddhist perspective. This is something we've planned for ~15 years but never quite gotten to before!
Read 4 tweets
Mar 13, 2023
An extraordinary essay on ethics by @jkcarlsmith, highly recommended for those willing to work through its difficulty.

What happens when you realize moral philosophy doesn't and can't work, but saying "whatever, then, I guess" is also utterly inadequate? joecarlsmith.com/2023/02/17/see…
"Seeing more whole" is difficult both textually and conceptually. I had to read it three times. It's probably also necessary to have read a precursor essay, which is less exciting but lays out distinctions the later one relies on: joecarlsmith.com/2023/02/16/why…
What follows are some reactions to "Seeing more whole." These should not be taken as a reliable summary; I may misunderstand it, and the ways I think about ethics have different sources and vocabulary, although perhaps convergent implications. I will talk in my terms, not his.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(