Judith Danovitch's researches how preschool & elementary school kids evaluate & think about information. In this article, she evaluates claims of "mask harms" and the impiactions, for cognitive development, of not seeing mouths, smiles & frowns.🧵 nytimes.com/2021/08/18/opi…
Daovitch admits that, though there is little data on masks per se, there is evidence from head coverings. “Children in cultures where caregivers & educators wear head coverings that obscure their mouths & noses develop skills just as children in other cultures do.”
What’s more, she adds, blind people still learn to speak, read and socialize.
Danovitch points out that “looking at eyes is at least as important as looking at mouths" given that by age 2, typical kids spend 2x as much time on eyes than on mouths.
In fact, Danovitch points out, children who infer thoughts and emotions based on eyes alone, exhibit greater emotional intelligence.
All this should really make us wonder why the anti-maskers aren’t at least as concerned, if not more concerned, with sunglasses and hairstyles that hide the eyes, than they are with masks. But I digress.
Masks, Danovitch says, also are opportunities to develop skills that rely on “ prosody, gesture & context” as well as “ tone of voice or a teacher’s body language”.
In addition, in keeping a mask on and in place, kids can develop the kind of self-control that helps at “achieving their long-term goals, solving problems and handling stressful situations.”
Danovitch adds that masks are practice at caring for the community and lessons in transmission that give children opportunities to feel good about “sacrifices on behalf of others in need”.
Surprising no one whose been paying attention, how children feel about masks is largely a reflection of how their parents feel about masks.
Which makes one wonder what the "mask harm" parents are saying to their kids and why masks can’t be like other hardships kids inevitably face where we often teach them to turn adversity to advantage.
At the very least Danovitch provides a helpful roadmap for parents interested in redirecting potential mask complaints to other skills to encourage: like those of emotional intelligence and personal growth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@ShiraDoronMD et al argue against universal masking in healthcare based on 2 claims: 1) transmission risk from HCWs w/out symptoms is low 2) vaccination is sufficienly protective against hospital-acquired infection.
These claims are both knowably, provably wrong.
@AnnalsofIM
🧵
To establish their first claim, that the risk of transmission from HCWs without symptoms is low, the authors cite two sources: a) Killingley and b) Tayyar.
But a) Killingley does NOT show presymptomatic transmission risk is small. What Killingley actually shows is that, what the authors pass off as "minimal presymptomatic shedding," is consistent with **44% of transmission occuring presymptomatically**.
In honor of @TracyBethHoeg’s new anti-mask propaganda/preprint, I compiled her Tweets on mask studies into a textbook I’m calling, “Confounders: A Matter of Convenience.” It’s an expose of Hoeg’s bad faith hypocrisy. 🧵
Here’s the title page with a table of contents.
CHAPTER I:
HOW TO PROTEST PRO-MASK STUDIES
It's easy! Just complain the conclusion doesn’t hold because the data is confounded! 1. Eg. The Boston Mask Study
The moral panic over school closures has left us with problems more intractable than they were pre-pandemic because now, to solve those problems, we first have to dispel lies. That school is a preventative to suicide is a reprehensible distortion, but it is not the only one. 🧵
There is the hysteria over how closures hurt minorities the most which obscures that, for minorities, school is the source of a problem: the school-to-prison pipeline. nytimes.com/2020/10/28/opi…
There is the hysteria that closures are causing obesity which obscures the problem of fatty, nutritionally bankrupt cafeteria food. nypost.com/2019/11/16/the…
Following a lead in @mehdirhasan's receipt-riddled expose, I looked into FL's deadly summers but in terms of excess deaths (Hasan uses C0VID deaths) in the 10 US states with the highest percentage of seniors. Tl;dr: DeSantis won't be using these stats on the campaign trail. 🧵
The long list of concerns downplayers coopted for the sake of opening schools and then quickly abandoned: learning loss that didn't carry over to C0VID related cognitive declines, newsinfo.inquirer.net/1639956/omicro…
Shenoy et al urge abandoning universal masking on the grounds masks have little benefit & some harm. Yesterday I showed they're wrong about benefits. Today I show they're wrong about harms. Their strongest evidence favors masks. The rest has little relation to their ambitions. 🧵
In making the case that masks harm, the authors use three sources.
In Cormier et al patients & providers rate their masked & unmasked encounters in terms of communication difficulties. Using scales from 1-5 (patients) or from 1-6 (providers) participants are asked about eg. listening effort, ability to connect, understand & recall.