1. Dymka, a cat suffering from frostbite that required amputation of all four of her legs, is walking again thanks to 3D printed titanium legs: bit.ly/3j0H97S. She’s one of many cats and dogs who were either born with a disability or suffered accidents.
2. There’s Vincent and Oscar in the UK and Perseus in Greece. Vito in Italy. And Naki’o in the United States. And then there are the thousands helped by wheelchairs. Technology is not just improving our lives, it is making life better for animals.
3. Yet not everyone is celebrating. In the book “Bad Dog,” Harlan Weaver, a professor of gender studies at Kansas State University, objects to these stories, claiming they “reveal salacious and almost pornographic exceptionalizations of disabled bodies.”
4. He denies that the disability these animals face can be “solved with a little technology and ingenuity,” despite all evidence to the contrary.
5. He further claims that doing so “erases” the experiences of disabled people because “these interventions involve reshaping bodies to fit into hostile worlds, rather than pushing those worlds themselves to reshape and, at the least, do less violence to nonnormative bodies.”
6. Of course, Weaver also defends backyard breeding and killing animals in pounds, as well as argues that Michael Vick and other dogfighters should not be prosecuted because they are “victims” of “white cis heteropatiarchy” that enables “toxic masculinities.”
7. Weaver argues that placing dogs who survived dogfighting in caring, family homes is racist because the dogs “were effectively segregated from Blackness.”
8. He argues that middle class homes are “rather terrible” and promote “settler-colonial and racist dynamics of land allocation.”
9. And he argues that we need to allow the harpooning of whales and clubbing of seals because of “native cosmologies.”
10. As such, I find it breathtaking that anyone would take his claims seriously. But people do and “Bad Dog” is part of a growing number of books and journal articles by professors calling for sacrificing animals on the altar of critical race theory: bit.ly/3B5G5Gy.
11. In the last few months, I have devoted a lot of my time writing about the emergence of critical race theory in the animal protection movement and the threat it poses to animals. Please join me on Substack: nathanwinograd.substack.com.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Victory! In a lawsuit by rescuers against the Los Angeles County pound, the Court of Appeal unanimously ruled that California shelters cannot kill animals rescue groups are willing to save by claiming those animals have “behavioral problems” based on temperament tests.
2. Specifically, the court ruled that “the County lacks discretion to withhold and euthanize a dog based upon its determination that the animal has a behavioral problem or is not adoptable or treatable.”
3. This is the pound that killed Bowie, a shy 15-week-old puppy, claiming he had “behavioral problems.” The rescuer who offered to save him was devastated. She called it a “gut punch.” But the ruling applies statewide to all California shelters.
1. AB 595, Bowie’s Law, would require California shelters to notify rescuers before killing an animal. But it faces powerful opposition from regressive pounds and their enablers. Please email Appropriations Committee members and urge a YES vote on AB 595:
1. Bowie's Law would require shelters to notify rescue groups before killing animals: bit.ly/40UeQvf.
The following groups betrayed shelter animals by opposing it:
- Amador County Animal Control
- ASPCA
- Animal Rescue Foundation
- Animal Samaritans SPCA
(cont'd...)
2. - Animal Shelter Assistance Program
- Antioch Animal Services
- Bakersfield SPCA
- Barstow Humane Society
- Berkeley - East Bay Humane Society
- Best Friends Animal Society
- Butte Humane Society
- Calaveras County Animal Services
(cont'd...)
3. - California Animal Welfare Association
- California State Association of Counties
- California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
- Carmel Police Department Animal Control
- Central California SPCA
- Chula Vista Animal Services
Bowie's Law overwhelmingly passed its Assembly Committee vote today. There is still a long way to go, but the road just got a little less steep.
Thank you, Rep. @billessayli, for your leadership and today's testimony in favor. You are the wind at the animals' back.
Animals have no voice of their own and need us to speak for them. So thank you Rep. @Patterdude as well, both for co-sponsoring the bill from day one and for your heartfelt testimony.
Thank you also Vice-Chair @HeathFloraCA, for your vote and support in favor of dogs, cats & rabbits in shelters (AB595). You said it best: it is impossible to understand how telling the public and rescuers that an animal needs help is a bad thing. It isn't. And they deserve it.
1. Hearing from constituents should always be welcome. It is called democracy. And AB 595 by @billessayli will save lives: nonprofit organizations often rescue from multiple shelters, are run by people with other jobs, and are foster-care based.
2. AB 595 would give them notice of animals needing rescue at multiple shelters without having to travel to each one while giving them time to arrange foster care and accept custody of animals before they are killed.
3. This will allow them to rescue more animals, leading to fewer animals like Bowie being killed despite rescue groups ready, willing, and able to save them.
1 of 5. Los Angeles County’s shelter director admits killing Bowie was “improper” and that staff “did not proactively contact a rescue group to adopt him and provide behavioral rehabilitation” though it would have saved his life: bit.ly/3JbczFF.
2 of 5. Unfortunately, the director did not commit to doing so going forward. Instead, she admitted that many of these animals would continue to “not be networked for adoption”: bit.ly/3JbczFF.
3 of 5. Sadly, we cannot bring Bowie back. But we will remember his killing as many things, tragic and heartbreaking chief among them. Nothing can alter that. But we can lessen the futility of his death if we learn from it. And pass a law to prevent it from happening again.