David Roberts Profile picture
Aug 22, 2021 21 tweets 4 min read Read on X
OK, I will probably regret this, but I'm going to do a thread on Afghanistan, because something about the current discourse is baffling me. I'll lay out the situation as I see it & then hopefully someone smart can answer my question.
We've been in Afghanistan for 20 years. At first it was to diminish terrorist capacity, but that pretty quickly faded & the new mission was state-building: building a gov't & a military that could prevent the Taliban from taking back over.
Through all those 20 years, all the surges & drone strikes & wasted money & lost lives, we have failed utterly in that mission. The gov't was weak & lacked support outside Kabul. The military was a shitshow (often responsible for its own atrocities).
We've known for a while that the state-building is futile (Biden told Obama when he was VP), but in US politics, sticking w/ a disastrous military intervention is less politically risky than ending one, so no one actually did it until Biden.
More or less everyone knew that, when the US finally left, the Taliban would take back over. Worth repeating: everyone knew this. No one knew or proposed any way of avoiding it, other than staying there forever. Some hawks would be fine w/ that, but the US people weren't.
Now, Biden -- along with *everyone else*, including US intelligence agencies -- believed that, while the gov't & military were weak, they would, at least, fight off the Taliban for a few weeks or months. Everyone thought that Taliban takeover would take a while.
It is obviously clear now that the Taliban was more prepared, and the gov't & military even weaker, than anticipated. The takeover happened much faster than anyone (again: anyone) predicted. It made for some ugly imagery, though things have proceeded fairly well since.
So, here are some possible criticisms of Biden:
1. He should have prevented the Taliban takeover. But the only way he could have done that is by staying forever. Unless you support that, you're acknowledging that the harms of Taliban takeover were inevitable.
2. He should have evacuated Americans & allies before announcing the withdrawal. But as Biden has said, doing so would have been waving a giant red flag -- an unmistakeable signal to everyone that the gov't & military were going to collapse. He didn't want to signal that. Now ...
... in retrospect, given how rapid the takeover was, it probably wouldn't have made much difference. But again, no one knew it would be so fast. The admin wanted to give the gov't & military a sporting chance. That made sense given the info they had at the time.
3. Biden should have slowed down the Taliban takeover, to give more time for orderly withdrawal of Americans & allies. But the only way to do that would have been yet another "surge" of troops. As Biden asked, would you want your kid to be the last one to die in a futile war?
4. Given how rapid the Taliban takeover turned out to be, Biden should have evacuated more ... competently. But what does this mean? There have been comparatively few lost lives. People are getting out now. How, *specifically*, should Biden have evacuated differently?
The characteristic feature of Afghanistan discourse among pundits & VSPs is that virtually no one grapples with these questions honestly. You've got pundits who haven't said shit about a disastrous waste of money & lives for 20 years suddenly caring.
You've got Republicans who wouldn't piss on a refugee if they were on fire going on TV to weep crocodile tears about the Afghanis left behind. You've got people waving their hands around "competence" while refusing to say what could have been done differently.
You've got people still putting "Biden's catastrophe" in their headlines when, after one chaotic/ugly day, we've had five days of relatively orderly withdrawal, with very few casualties. You've got the Republican architects of this whole epic fuckup on TV backseat driving (😡)!
Here's what happened: we got hit on 9/11, it activated all our worst impulses, we lunged into an endless war with no chance of success, we predictably failed, and now an elite class with a lifetime of American-exceptionalism delusions just can't fucking deal with it.
It is tragic what's happening in Afghanistan. It's tragic what's *going* to happen, especially to women & girls, especially to Afghanis who put their lives on the line to help us. It's absolutely awful. But after 20 years, we have to accept: there's not much we can do about it.
Turns out we're not the world's Superman, just a blundering, violent oaf, stepping on rakes. It's a bitter pill to swallow, especially for a relatively insular US population that has had nationalist mythology blown up its ass for as long as it's been alive.
But it is dysfunctional & dishonest to take all that negative feeling, all that humiliation & impotence & rage, & channel it into ... bashing Joe Biden, the president who finally had the gonads to end this thing. Ending it was always going to be ugly. The choice ...
... was an ugly ending or staying there forever. Just once, I'd like to see this country grow the fuck up & take responsibility for its mistakes & acknowledge the limits of its power, to see itself from the outside rather than from within a haze of self-serving mythologies.
As it is, looking around at the way US elites have responded to this, I have no faith that we won't do something equally stupid in response to another attack. We refuse to learn.

Anyway, that's my Afghanistan take. Had to get it off my chest. You may yell at me now. </fin>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

Sep 25
I don't think anyone -- *especially* not anyone on the right -- has truly reckoned with how hollow, cowardly, & pathetic the Republican Party turned out to be, as violently exposed by Trump. theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
The thing that was called the Republican Party for most of my political adulthood -- the very serious, suit-wearing, chin-stroking types that appeared on Sunday shows -- was ephemera. An illusion. GOP was always a collection of lickspittle proto-fascists waiting for a strongman.
It's not just Republicans like David Frum who participated in this illusion & owe us an accounting. The mainstream media worked as hard, if not harder(!), to prop up the illusion. Even as dirty hippies on the outside shouted & shouted about the reality.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25
It is effectively impossible to communicate how bad this is to ordinary Americans because no one has done the steady work, across the years, of communicating the importance of the large, stable US bureaucracy. You can't just parachute in at the last minute waving red flags.
I've run into this thought again & again over the last 10 years, as MAGA reactionaries try to dismantle the US system: we really should have spent more time conveying the value of that system, not just every four years, but as part of an ongoing communications effort.
We (educated liberals engaged w/ politics) take it for granted that people understand the value of rule of law, competent expertise in nonpartisan gov't bureaucracies, separation of powers, etc. etc. They don't. That stuff needs to be celebrated as loudly as RWers demonize it.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 15
This is such a key insight into reactionary psychology. Their atavistic fears & instincts are primary, the unmoved mover, the foundation. Evidence -- what this world actually tells us through observation -- can & sometimes is used to support the instincts, but it's not necessary.
You can see echos of this all over the place. They want to pass repressive voter restrictions. Why? There's no evidence of any substantial voter fraud!

Yeah, but they *feel like there is*, and that's enough, so they must be satisfied.
The election was not stolen, but the J6 rioters *felt like it was*, so that justifies what they did.

Remember "facts don't care about your feelings"? That was all defensive projection too.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 13
Hey, want to hear a funny story? (It's not that funny.)

Yesterday was my birthday. Guess what I got?

An emergency appendectomy! 🎂🎉🥳

I'm sitting, bored, in a hospital bed, so I'll tell the tale.
About 20 minutes before Mrs. Volts & I landed in Paris on Wed., I started getting stomach pains ... cold sweats ... kind of felt like I needed to diarrhea & puke at the same time ... not great. I thought it was food poisoning.
Folks, lemme tell you, the ensuing few hours were some of the most harrowing I've ever had traveling. Sit through the excruciatingly long de-boarding, then customs, border, security, race to other side of airport for connecting flight ... all while basically doubled over.
Read 17 tweets
Sep 10
I don't really disagree with this Chait piece -- if repudiating some Biden stances will help Harris, she should do it -- but I do find this passage maddening:

nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Image
This is so revealing. A certain kind of center-left pundit has decided that critiques of political media are something silly leftists do. So they're left with no explanation at all about why a president who ended our forever war & rescued a tanking economy is unpopular.
I find it quite frustrating that Biden is unpopular despite what is, by almost any empirical measure, an incredibly successful term ... but I do not find it confounding or bewildering. It's an inevitable outcome of a diseased, dysfunctional information environment!
Read 10 tweets
Sep 1
One is never sure, On Here, whether a respondent is actually addressing one or whether they are just recruiting one as a stand-in for some bogey man they want to bash, but on the off chance it's the former here, let me clarify what I meant.
I want the public to be better informed about Harris -- who she is, her approach to governing, her plans, etc. That's good for democracy. It would also (happily in my judgment) be good for her electorally, but that's not the main point. The public should get more/better info.
The problem, as I & others have documented at tedious length, for decades nows, is that the professional class whose purported job it is to educate the public about candidates -- the official political press -- kind of sucks at it.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(