Until pretty recently it was hard to find a political message about addressing climate change in the US that went beyond consumer choice (or worse, overpopulation). Now it's much easier to come across messages, even campaigns that call for regulation, planning, policy change...
That shift reflects years of organizing and education. With covid, the pandemic hit much faster than the left's ability to organize around it, and that first step of internal education is still far from complete.
I was naive bc I assumed that commited leftists would look at the pandemic response through lens of class power, structural racism, intertwined fates. But maybe most people need to be specifically organized around each new issue
Including our so-called leaders who are not so much leading as responding to decades of struggle by regular people

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Justin Feldman

Justin Feldman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jfeldman_epi

15 Sep
Okay this thing isn't going away so let's talk about why 1 in 5000 is actually meaningless and, despite vaccines' relatively powerful protection against hospitalization, breakthrough infections aren't "rare" when community spread is high.

Short thread
The figure comes from the NYT newsletter (reported as the individual *daily* risk of infection among the vaccinated). It was cited by Biden in his new covid response plan (somehow reported as a *weekly* infection risk) and has been otherwise making the rounds.
Where does the number come from? NYT guy David Leonhart apparently looked at data from a few arbitrary jurisdictions that track breakthrough infections (UT, VA, King County WA) and decided the numbers were trustworthy and could be applied nationally.
Read 16 tweets
21 Aug
Is it just me or did CDC go from "breakthrough infections are rare" to "we need boosters to prevent breakthrough infections" in like a week? And I'm not sure if the first talking point was rescinded.
And please take a moment to consider before you get mad at this
"What was previously uncertain is now revealed to be extra risky and we didn't prepare for it" is called not following the precautionary principle and that is a political stance
Read 6 tweets
6 Aug
Black and Indigenous people are being hit hardest by delta, with 2.4 and 1.8x the hospitalization rate of whites in the US, respectively.

These figures actually understate the inequalities because populations of color are younger than the white population.
Screenshot from CDC's COVIDnet gis.cdc.gov/grasp/covidnet…
COVID-net only covers 10 states, and some states that are being hit particularly hard right now like Florida are excluded
Read 5 tweets
22 Jun
1/ I'm gonna use this to lay out a messy, preliminary version of an argument here. The question I'm trying to answer:

Why did US public health experts generally not push for the kinds of broad shutdowns that our counterparts advocated in many other countries?
2/ The answer is manifold, but I want to focus on one particular aspect here.
3/ Shutdowns are big, blunt instruments of the sort US scientists are socialized to eschew in favor of lightweight, targeted, local intervention. We're told to be pragmatic, that only micro-interventions will actually get adopted bc they’re palatable to politicians and the public
Read 21 tweets
5 Apr
The unstated US pandemic strategy:
- Strongly disfavor policies that interfere with business
- Favor individual behavior change
- Tolerate an unlimited number of deaths
- Intervene more strongly to avoid exceeding ICU capacity (sometimes)
- Rely nearly exclusively on vaccination
Most social distancing in the US has been voluntary. In Jan 2021, you could've eaten indoors in 46 states.

Social distancing has been about individuals choosing to avoid risk to themselves and others. This is far less effective than govt policy and not everyone has a choice
Despite the lax government response, we see a weird type of 'inventing a guy to get mad about' response, wherein people (mainly elites) are upset about social distancing and still want to blame government for doing *too much*.
Read 5 tweets
19 Mar
On Jan 21, Biden signed an executive order stating OSHA would issue an emergency covid regulation by March 15 "if such standards are determined to be necessary". Guess that's not happening.
Apparently they've opted instead to focus inspections on the highest-risk covid sites. But that leaves the vast majority of workplaces unprotected. And without a regulation, it's easier to fight citations under the less specific "general duty clause" osha.gov/enforcement/di…
Can a worker who refuses unsafe conditions then collect unemployment? Biden promised this, but details are still unclear (please let me know if you know something I don't) archive.is/M9RUT
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!