As the evidence supporting ivermectin as COVID treatment collapses, you might expect *less* certainty from the drug’s evangelists.
Instead they’ve doubled down on ivermectin.
It’s worth reading this passage from Festinger’s Theory of Cognitive Dissonance to understand: 1/
For context, Festinger & colleagues joined a cult (“The Seekers”) who believed the world would end on December 21, 1954 & that true believers would be rescued by a UFO
The researchers wondered how the Seekers would react to “disconfirmation” when this didn’t happen.
2/
As the date approached, the researchers watched many “Seekers” take irrevocable steps because of their belief: they quit their jobs, severed ties to loved ones, & disposed of possessions.
What would happen when their beliefs were discredited? 3/
When 12/21/54 came and went without the promised apocalypse, they observed that rather than abandoning their discredited beliefs, the “Seekers” adhered to them even *more strongly* & began to proselytize *more fervently*.
4/
Examining the Seekers & other examples, Festinger & colleagues theorized that in order to resolve the dissonance between belief & reality, believers sometimes become more fervent in their belief (discounting reality).
They observed 5 conditions that make this more likely: 5/
Now consider the experience of ivermectin believers:
- many of the initial studies supporting IVM have been discredited as fraudulent (Surgisphere, Elegazzar, Cadegiani)
- several large RCTs have found no benefit to IVM (EPIC, TOGETHER, IVERCORCOVID) 6/ nature.com/articles/d4158…
- a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19”
- multiple state & federal agencies (FDA, CDC, NIH, etc) have warned people explicitly NOT to take ivermectin
- the rampant use of veterinary ivermectin has led to a surge in poisonings. (Last week >70% of calls to poison control center in MS were about ivermectin) 8/
- And finally, the rapid development of safe, highly effective, & widely available vaccines has eliminated the raison d'être of IVM as a “bridge to vaccines”
In light of all this evidence “disconfirming” IVM, why do its proponents cling to it all the more fervently?
9/
If we look at Festinger’s 5 conditions, we can see that all are met: 1. The core believers (FLCCC, BIRD, etc) are deeply & publicly committed to this belief. One has testified before Congress that IVM is a “wonder drug” & “miracle cure.” Others have built a brand on IVM.
10/
2. Believers in IVM have invested all of their reputation in the belief. Most have lost the respect of colleagues. At least one has stopped practicing medicine to focus exclusively on promoting IVM as a cure.
For many it would be hard, or impossible, to undo these effects. 11/
3&4. At least a dozen large high quality RCTs of IVM are ongoing. Each is explicitly testing whether IVM can prevent or treat COVID.
Each can potentially falsify the belief that IVM prevents/cures COVID (and several already have). 12/
5. Although some people, confronted by the overwhelmingly negative evidence, have stopped believing in IVM, most have stayed committed to the core belief and the group.
Having invested so much time & reputation, many find it is hard to just walk away. 13/
The core IVM believers have taken on increasingly anti-vaxx conspiracy theorist beliefs:
- Not only do they discount the mounting negative studies of IVM but they allege a massive global cabal of governments, big tech, & pharma to encourage vaccination and “suppress the cure”
14/
What will happen?
Faced with “disconfirmation” & increasing cognitive dissonance most cults eventually collapse.
After the world didn’t end on 12/21/54, the “Seekers” rescheduled the apocalypse to Christmas Eve. When 12/25 came & went, most members returned to their lives. 15/
In honor of #MayThe4thBeWithYou let's consider the most difficult airways in the Star Wars universe:
1. Darth Vader
Species: human
Vader presents several challenges: Vent dependent at baseline, airway burns from Mustafar, limited neck mobility.
Discuss GOC before saving him
2. Fodesinbeed Annodue
Species: Trog
All airways require teamwork, but intubating Fodesinbeed Annodue's two heads really will require two operators.
Consider double simultaneous awake fiberoptic intubation
Be sure to consent both heads.
You will never find a more wretched hive of scum & challenging airways than Mos Eisley (except maybe at Jabba's)
3.Greedo
Species: Rodian
Micrognathia, posterior airway, no nasal intubation, green skin so no pulse ox
Approach: VL + bronchoscope. Intubate quickly (shoot first)
Every year, there is a predictable spike in fatal car accidents, medical errors, & heart attacks.
It’s estimated that there are thousands of excess deaths, a 1% increase in energy consumption, & billions of dollars in lost GDP.
The cause? Daylight savings transitions.
🧵
1/
Earth's axis of rotation and orbital axis are not precisely aligned. The 23.5 degree difference - 'axis tilt' - gives us our seasons and a noticeable difference in day length over the course of the year.
2/
For millennia this seasonal variation was an accepted fact of life.
In 1895, George Hudson, a New Zealand entomologist, was annoyed that less afternoon light meant less time for bug collecting.
He realized that clocks could be adjusted seasonally to align with daylight.
Unlike other Trump moves, this is arguably GOOD news for researchers!
If the NIH budget is unchanged (a big if), this allocates more money to researchers; if you go from an indirect of 75% to 15% it means you can fund 3 grants instead of 2.
Between 1947 and 1965, indirect rates ranged from 8% to 25% of total direct costs. In 1965, Congress removed most caps. Since then indirects have steadily risen.
2/
A lot of indirects go to thing like depreciation of facilities not paying salaries of support staff.
This accounting can be a little misleading.
If donors build a new $400m building, the institution can depreciate it & “lose” $20m/year over 20 years. Indirects pay this.
3/
🚨Apparently all NIH Study Sections have been suspended indefinitely.
For those who don’t know, this means there won’t be any review of grants submitted to NIH
Depending on how long this goes on for, this could lead to an interruption in billions in research funding.
With a budget of ~$47.4B, the NIH is by far the biggest supporter of biomedical research worldwide.
Grants are reviewed periodically by committees of experts outside of the NIH.
When these study sections are cancelled, it prevents grants from being reviewed & funded.
Hopefully this interruption will be brief (days)
A longer interruption in study sections (months) will inevitably cause an interruption in grant funding. This means labs shutdown, researchers furloughed/fired, & clinical trials suspended. This will harm progress & patients!
#HurricaneHelene damaged the factory responsible for manufacturing over 60% of all IV fluids used in the US, leading to a major national shortage.
As clinicians what can we do to about the #IVFluidShortage and how can we prevent this crisis from happening again?
A thread 🧵 1/
There are many things we can do as clinicians to improve ICU care & reduce IVF use.
1️⃣Don't order Maintenance IV Fluid!
Almost no patient actually needs continuous IV fluids.
Most either need resuscitation (e.g. boluses) or can take fluid other ways (PO, feeding tube, TPN).
2/
Frequently if someone is NPO overnight for a procedure, MIVF are ordered.
This is wrong for two reasons.
We are all NPO while asleep & don't need salt water infusions!
We should be letting people drink clears up to TWO HOURS before surgery, per ASA.