As the evidence supporting ivermectin as COVID treatment collapses, you might expect *less* certainty from the drug’s evangelists.
Instead they’ve doubled down on ivermectin.
It’s worth reading this passage from Festinger’s Theory of Cognitive Dissonance to understand: 1/
For context, Festinger & colleagues joined a cult (“The Seekers”) who believed the world would end on December 21, 1954 & that true believers would be rescued by a UFO
The researchers wondered how the Seekers would react to “disconfirmation” when this didn’t happen.
2/
As the date approached, the researchers watched many “Seekers” take irrevocable steps because of their belief: they quit their jobs, severed ties to loved ones, & disposed of possessions.
What would happen when their beliefs were discredited? 3/
When 12/21/54 came and went without the promised apocalypse, they observed that rather than abandoning their discredited beliefs, the “Seekers” adhered to them even *more strongly* & began to proselytize *more fervently*.
4/
Examining the Seekers & other examples, Festinger & colleagues theorized that in order to resolve the dissonance between belief & reality, believers sometimes become more fervent in their belief (discounting reality).
They observed 5 conditions that make this more likely: 5/
Now consider the experience of ivermectin believers:
- many of the initial studies supporting IVM have been discredited as fraudulent (Surgisphere, Elegazzar, Cadegiani)
- several large RCTs have found no benefit to IVM (EPIC, TOGETHER, IVERCORCOVID) 6/ nature.com/articles/d4158…
- a reputable meta-analysis by Cochrane (the gold standard) concluded “the reliable evidence available does not support the use of ivermectin for treatment or prevention of COVID‐19”
- multiple state & federal agencies (FDA, CDC, NIH, etc) have warned people explicitly NOT to take ivermectin
- the rampant use of veterinary ivermectin has led to a surge in poisonings. (Last week >70% of calls to poison control center in MS were about ivermectin) 8/
- And finally, the rapid development of safe, highly effective, & widely available vaccines has eliminated the raison d'être of IVM as a “bridge to vaccines”
In light of all this evidence “disconfirming” IVM, why do its proponents cling to it all the more fervently?
9/
If we look at Festinger’s 5 conditions, we can see that all are met: 1. The core believers (FLCCC, BIRD, etc) are deeply & publicly committed to this belief. One has testified before Congress that IVM is a “wonder drug” & “miracle cure.” Others have built a brand on IVM.
10/
2. Believers in IVM have invested all of their reputation in the belief. Most have lost the respect of colleagues. At least one has stopped practicing medicine to focus exclusively on promoting IVM as a cure.
For many it would be hard, or impossible, to undo these effects. 11/
3&4. At least a dozen large high quality RCTs of IVM are ongoing. Each is explicitly testing whether IVM can prevent or treat COVID.
Each can potentially falsify the belief that IVM prevents/cures COVID (and several already have). 12/
5. Although some people, confronted by the overwhelmingly negative evidence, have stopped believing in IVM, most have stayed committed to the core belief and the group.
Having invested so much time & reputation, many find it is hard to just walk away. 13/
The core IVM believers have taken on increasingly anti-vaxx conspiracy theorist beliefs:
- Not only do they discount the mounting negative studies of IVM but they allege a massive global cabal of governments, big tech, & pharma to encourage vaccination and “suppress the cure”
14/
What will happen?
Faced with “disconfirmation” & increasing cognitive dissonance most cults eventually collapse.
After the world didn’t end on 12/21/54, the “Seekers” rescheduled the apocalypse to Christmas Eve. When 12/25 came & went, most members returned to their lives. 15/
#HurricaneHelene damaged the factory responsible for manufacturing over 60% of all IV fluids used in the US, leading to a major national shortage.
As clinicians what can we do to about the #IVFluidShortage and how can we prevent this crisis from happening again?
A thread 🧵 1/
There are many things we can do as clinicians to improve ICU care & reduce IVF use.
1️⃣Don't order Maintenance IV Fluid!
Almost no patient actually needs continuous IV fluids.
Most either need resuscitation (e.g. boluses) or can take fluid other ways (PO, feeding tube, TPN).
2/
Frequently if someone is NPO overnight for a procedure, MIVF are ordered.
This is wrong for two reasons.
We are all NPO while asleep & don't need salt water infusions!
We should be letting people drink clears up to TWO HOURS before surgery, per ASA.
New favorite physiology paper: Central Venous Pressure in Space.
So much space & cardio physiology to unpack here including:
- effects of posture, 3g shuttle launch, & microgravity on CVP
- change in the relationship between filling pressure (CVP) & LV size
- Guyton curves! 1/
To measure CVP in space they needed two things:
📼 an instrument/recorder that could accurately measure pressure despite g-force, vibration, & changes in pressure. They built & tested one!
🧑🚀👩🚀👨🚀 an astronaut willing to fly into space with a central line! 3 volunteered! 2/
The night before launch they placed a 4Fr central line in the median cubital vein & advanced under fluoro.
🚀The astronauts wore the data recorder under their flight suit during launch.
🌍The collected data from launch up to 48 hrs in orbit. 3/
Did he have a head CT? What did it show?
Did he have stitches? Tetanus shot?
The NYT ran nonstop stories about Biden’s health after the debate but can’t be bothered to report on the health of someone who was literally shot in the head?
To the people in the replies who say it’s impossible because of “HIPPA” 1. I assume you mean HIPAA 2. A normal presidential candidate would allow his doctors to release the info. This is exactly what happened when Reagan survived an assassination attempt. washingtonpost.com/obituaries/202…
My advice to journalists is to lookup tangential gunshot wounds (TGSW).
Ask questions like:
- what imaging has he had?
- what cognitive assessments?
- has he seen a neurosurgeon or neurologist?
- he’s previously had symptoms like slurred speech, abnormal gait - are these worse?
If you intubate you need to read the #PREOXI trial!
-n=1301 people requiring intubation in ED/ ICU were randomized to preoxygenation with oxygen mask vs non-invasive ventilation (NIV)
-NIV HALVED the risk of hypoxemia: 9 vs 18%
-NIV reduced mortality: 0.2% vs 1.1%
#CCR24
🧵 1/
Hypoxemia (SpO2 <85%) occurs in 10-20% of ED & ICU intubations.
1-2% of intubations performed in ED/ICU result in cardiac arrest!
This is an exceptionally dangerous procedure and preoxygenation is essential to keep patients safe.
But what’s the *BEST* way to preoxygenate? 2/
Most people use a non-rebreather oxygen mask, but because of its loose fit it often delivers much less than 100% FiO2.
NIV (“BiPAP”) delivers a higher FiO2 because of its tight fit. It also delivers PEEP & achieves a higher mean airway pressure which is theoretically helpful! 3/
Results from #PROTECTION presented #CCR24 & published @NEJM.
- DB RCT of amino acid infusion vs placebo in n=3511 people undergoing cardiac surgery w/ bypass.
- Reduced incidence of AKI (26.9% vs 31.7% NNT=20) & need for RRT (1.4% vs 1.9% NNT=200)
Potential game changer!
🧵 1/
I work in a busy CVICU & I often see AKI following cardiac surgery.
Despite risk stratification & hemodynamic optimization, AKI remains one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery with bypass.
Even a modest reduction in AKI/CRRT would be great for my patients. 2/
During cardiac surgery w/ bypass, renal blood flow (RBF) is reduced dramatically. This causes injury, especially in susceptible individuals.
But what if we could use physiology to protect the kidneys?
Renal blood vessels dilate after a high protein meal increasing RBF & GFR! 3/